Sunday, June 14, 2020

Second Sunday after Pentecost - Proper 6A, June 14, 2020

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Robert Leo Sevensky, OHC

Genesis 18:1-15, (21:1-7)
Romans 5:1-8
Matthew 9:35-10:8(9-23)

The Lord said to Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, and say, ‘Shall I indeed bear a child, now that I am old?’ Is anything too wonderful for the Lord? At the set time I will return to you, in due season, and Sarah shall have a son.” But Sarah denied, saying, “I did not laugh”; for she was afraid. He said, “Oh yes, you did laugh.”


Many of you will be familiar with The Name of the Rose either as the novel by Umberto Eco (1980) or the movie based on the novel and starring Sean Connery and Christian Slater (1986).  The movie is, in my opinion, nearly as good as the book, and in some ways better since you get to avoid a whole lot of medieval Latin, though the critics disagree. The novel takes place in an imposing Benedictine abbey in early 14th century Italy where an alarming number of mysterious deaths are occurring.  A Franciscan friar, William of Baskerville (played by Sean Connery), is sent to investigate, and one emergent theme in the story concerns laughter.  Friar William and the Venerable Jorge, a blind and dour senior monk, engage in several impassioned debates over the role and legitimacy of laughter, all ultimately having to do with a secret text from Aristotle’s Poetics.  I won’t spoil the mystery for those of you who have not read the book or seen the movie.  But the debate is fascinating and not at all surprising for its time.    

I think it safe to say that Jorge is no fan of laughter.  He contends that laughter is a subversive power that promotes doubt, undermines authority, and upends the truth, distorting the image of God in us and making human beings look and act like monkeys.  His strongest argument: The Bible nowhere says that Jesus laughed.  And of course, he is right about that.

But Friar William, who is a kind of scientific Enlightenment precursor, is having none of it. He argues that the Bible omits many things about Jesus, but that doesn’t mean that he didn’t do them or approve of them.  God, William says, “…demands that we apply our reason to many obscure things about which Scripture has left us free to decide.”[1]  Moreover, if laughter is part of our created humanity, then our fully human Lord must surely have laughed.  Further, the good friar argues, humor and laughter play a pivotal role in undermining the false authority of what he calls absurd propositions that offend reason.  And perhaps most important, laughter is among the most effective ways to point out that an opinion holds no water or that an emperor has no clothes. 

If we look to the Bible, we find precious few references to laughter. And the references that we do have do not generally esteem it highly.  For example, as we pray the psalms day in and day out, we see that many references to laughter view it primarily in terms of ridicule or scorn, as in Psalm 2: “He whose throne is in heaven is laughing; the Lord has them in derision” or Psalm 59:  “But you, O Lord, you laugh at them; you laugh all the ungodly to scorn.”  Though we do read in Psalm 126, a psalm celebrating the return from exile: “Then was our mouth filled with laughter, and our tongue with shouts of joy.”

And of course the Rule of St. Benedict speaks rather harshly about laughter and its inappropriateness in a monastic setting, though I hasten to add that almost every modern commentator stresses that the Latin used in the Rule refers to ribald, loud or boisterous laughter or outright obscenity and not the laughter that comes from joy or surprise or delight. Even our own Fr. Hughson who has the reputation of being, shall we say, severe, quotes approvingly the following ditty in noting the gales of laughter that come from the monastic common room during community recreation:
“A little nonsense now and then
Is relished by the wisest men.” [2]
I’m sure the Venerable Jorge would disagree vehemently.

So what shall we make of laughter? And why exactly did Sarah laugh?  First, let’s be clear about one thing. Sarah wasn’t the only one who laughed. In the previous chapter of Genesis, when Abraham first hears of God’s plan for Sarah and him, it says:
Then Abraham fell on his face and laughed, and said to himself, “Can a child be born to a man who is a hundred years old? Can Sarah, who is ninety years old, bear a child?”  (17:17)
Then Abraham immediately asks God to get real and make Ismael, his surrogate son, his covenant descendant and heir. But no, God insists: “It’s you and Sarah I’m talking about.”

We know that laughter serves many purposes. It can be a way of deriding or dismissing our adversaries, as we see in the psalms and in real life.  Most of us know what it is to be laughed at derisively and probably have engaged in our share of it.  Sometimes childhood and adolescence seem to be nothing more than a stream of either laughing at others or being laughed at oneself. And then there is nervous laughter, a mechanism designed to cover our own embarrassment or fear or discomfort.  Laughter can be polite and even required in certain social situations.  But there is also laughter that issues from joy and delight, a spontaneous bubbling forth of emotions that express and bring pleasure to us and those around us.  Laughter can be a way to build community and relationships. And it can also be contagious in the very best sense, bringing strangers together and deepening friendships.  

Laughter helps us release stress. And even at the most solemn or weighty of times—during religious rituals, at the deathbed, or in the face of less than favorable circumstances—a certain type of gallows humor can help us to cope and even open up avenues of escape via other as yet unseen routes.  And perhaps most critical, laughter can help us see the bigger picture, putting people and events and ourselves in a more adequate and truer perspective. 

And yes, laughter can heal and help reduce pain and lift our spirits, even if only temporarily.  The breathing involved in a good belly laugh releases endorphins that affect our moods and our biochemistry. And the sharing of laughter can help us feel less isolated in our pain. I have a little pill box that is engraved with the words, “Laughter is the best medicine.”  Well maybe it’s not the best medicine, but it is surely medicinal. However, I digress.

Why did Sarah laugh? And Abraham? And why do we often laugh like them, figuratively, if not actually, rolling on the ground?  I believe they laughed because they were presented with what seemed to them an impossibility: a husband a century old and a wife of ninety and the ridiculous promise of a son.  “You’ve got to be kidding,” I can hear them saying. “Is this some kind of a joke?” And indeed, it is. The very incongruity and unexpectedness of the entire proposition and its surprising, indeed outrageous, absurdity elicits laughter, just as does any good joke.  But of course, with God this isn’t a joke, or at least not simply a joke.  It is a promise made from love which surpasses all human expectation or hope.  And when that promise is fulfilled and Sarah bears Abraham’s son, the child is named Isaac, which means He Laughs.  The story continues in Genesis, chapter 21:
The Lord dealt with Sarah as he had said, and the Lord did for Sarah as he had promised. Sarah conceived and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the time of which God had spoken to him.  Abraham gave the name Isaac to his son whom Sarah bore him…. Now Sarah said, “God has brought laughter for me; everyone who hears will laugh with me.”
Sarah’s hidden laughter at the door of the tent has now become public and shared. Now everyone will laugh with her and no longer at her in her childlessness.  Her joy becomes a vindication as well as a gift to the whole community and the whole world. 

In these difficult times, laughter can sometimes be scarce. In the nursing home or at an ICU bed or during a protest march, the sound is more often lament or concern or demand. But we need laughter now as well, even in these days, especially in these days. We desperately need to see the bigger picture. We need to be able to say that the emperor has no clothes.  We need to relax our tense grip, so that we can find a way forward.  Laughter facilitates that.  

God’s promise to us is Shalom, which though usually translated as Peace includes much more: health, wholeness, justice, mutuality, interdependence, right relationship. Such a promise can and does seem impossible. And we laugh, or perhaps sneer or snort or shrug our shoulders or roll our eyes. But God’s promises are nonnegotiable, and they will find their fulfillment. We need to be prepared to be both surprised and challenged. 

As one pastor prayed:
…Creator and Lord: Often when we are presented with opportunities beyond our own imagination, we laugh and disbelieve.  Sarah’s laughter is no different form our own now. When you present us with some amazing new possibility, be it love, faith, trust, or any of your many and manifold blessings, often we disbelieve.  We disbelieve because we cannot imagine success outside our own expectations. Help us Lord to see not what we can be, but to see what you would have us do, and help us to trust you, so that your will for us is successful.[3]
We need to be bold enough to imagine success outside the boundaries of our own expectations: 
  • Through our lives and our ministries, however limited they may now seem.  
  • In our communities and our relationships, however wide or narrow, shallow or deep. 
  • In our worship and work and rest.
  • And as the Great Litany so eloquently puts it: “In all time of our tribulation; in all time of our prosperity; in the hour of death, and in the day of judgment.”
Can we join with Abraham and Sarah in giving birth to one who laughs?  Can we trust that like Sarah, we will know a laughter that comes from promises fulfilled, hopes realized, transformations that will astound us?  Are we ready for a laughter that will become a gift to the whole world, such that everyone who hears will laugh with us?  

May the God, who takes delight in all created things, bless us all our laughing days.   Amen.

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Corpus Christi - June 11, 2020

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Maximillian Esmus, n/OHC
Corpus Christi - June 11, 2020


What are you hungry for? 

I remember my mom asking me that. It would be evening, an hour or so after supper, and I would wander into the living room saying “Mom, I’m hungry.” 

And she’d say, “Okay, let’s go to the kitchen and find you a snack. What are you hungry for?” We’d open one cupboard, then another, the fridge, then the freezer. “Do you want a banana?” No. “How about some crackers?” No. “A glass of milk?” No. 

I’d stand there staring at all this food feeling hungry, but nothing on offer seemed like just the right thing. Finally, Mom would say, “Max, get one of your sisters and go play. You’re not hungry for a snack, you’re just bored.” 

I hated when she said that! Because she was always right. I felt something missing, and I always assumed it was food. Actually, I was hungry for entertainment, for companionship, or maybe just for some attention from my mother. 

What are you truly hungry for? For what do you thirst?

Corpus Christi [The Body of Christ] is the feast on which we celebrate the Sacrament of Holy Communion, the Eucharist. I find myself in a curious place regarding Eucharist these last few months. After normal life shut down due to the pandemic, people of faith suffered the sudden loss of Sunday communion. While experiments and debates have gone on around practices such as virtual communion and drive-through communion, communion in its ordinary corporate form has ceased for the vast majority of Christians since mid-March.

We monks have an immeasurable gift in the fact that our corporate daily worship goes on basically intact, though we miss our guests terribly. I confess that I am at serious risk of taking it for granted day by day, and receiving it casually, absent-mindedly, even reluctantly. I sometimes feel ashamed of my boredom and resistance to daily communion, knowing that so much of the Church aches to receive once again the Bread of Life in its sacramental form.

This has led to me to ask myself, what do I come to this Table for? What am I really hungry for? What do we seek, as a community, in receiving Christ’s self in the sacrament? And what do our fellow members of Christ’s Body seek as they look forward once again to sharing Eucharist in their own communities?

I think this time of disruption and change offers an opportunity to reconnect with the core of what we desire at this Table, and to discover new, deeper desires by which God draws us to himself. The sacrament is wonderfully multi-faceted, yet we seem prone to focus too much on one aspect or another and distort the mystery. We get comfortable experiencing it on a particular level and fail to notice what lies deeper. 

Br. Randy said a couple of years ago on this feast, “The nourishment of God brings peace and a restless longing for more.” Jesus comes to abide in us and satisfies our longing, “only to send us at the same moment onward to new searching and hollows our spiritual bellies to create anew the very appetite he himself feeds.” (Randy Greve, Sermon May 31, 2018) 

What is our appetite today? Do we hunger for forgiveness and remission of sin? That is available at this Table. But we should be careful to recognize that, while reconciliation is effected here as a prerequisite for the consummation of the feast, it is not the ultimate goal of the Eucharist. Bonnell Spencer, OHC, the great liturgical scholar of our community, lamented the almost singular focus upon redemption from sin that had come to distort the Church’s understanding of the Eucharist prior to the renewals of the 20th century. That distortion still influences us today. Fr. Spencer describes a Christian fellowship that remains stuck on sin, unconvinced of its worthiness to stand before God. He writes that for many, church had become merely “a group of seekers after God who gather to give each other encouragement and advice. God was remote…” He goes on: “As long as the members expect no more than that, the group cannot manifest the power of the risen Christ.” (Bonnell Spencer, OHC, The Sacrifice of Thanksgiving, p.67) Beneath our hunger to be forgiven and reconciled to God, we may find a deeper hunger for that abundant, Risen life. 

Do we long to worship and adore Christ? He makes himself available to be adored here in a beautifully concrete way. But true adoration will make us open to his active and inspiring life. Fr. Spencer goes on to lament the common perception at our altars of a Real, but basically inert Presence: “Christ’s presence was asserted, but it was a static presence. [Christ] did not do anything in the Eucharist; he was simply there, to be offered, adored, and received.” Fr. Spencer urges us instead to embrace a doctrine of the Real Presence “which [knows] nothing of a passive Christ…he [is] fully active through his body the Church, with all its members sharing in his activity.” (Bonnell Spencer, OHC, The Sacrifice of Thanksgiving, p. 105) This sacrament may inspire a deeper hunger in us which welcomes that overflowing activity.

Do we hunger for intimacy with Christ, for the comfort of his presence? The presence Jesus offers us is personal and deeply intimate, but it is not private. The life in you that is being fed at Eucharist is not your own, for your own private enjoyment. It is the life of the whole Body of which you and I are members. Do we hunger for an awareness of our oneness in that Body? We will feel it around this altar. But the moment passes, and the feelings fade. God gives us that experience not for our enjoyment of a spiritual high, but because God needs us to know, in the core of our being, that we truly belong to each other, so that we will have the strength and courage to do the work he has given us to do, manifesting the Reign of God in the world. We may find deeper appetites. Do you hunger for God’s Reign of perfect justice and perfect mercy?

Christ is here to satisfy all these hungers and more! And for that, brothers and sisters, it is indeed right, and good, and a joyful thing, always and everywhere, to give thanks to almighty God. We give thanks in this sacrifice of praise because we are alive; or rather, Christ is alive in us. God created the universe and calls it very good, and the Word, through whom all things were made, lives a Risen and abundant life in you and me! 

It is a joyful thing to give thanks always and everywhere. Even now! I find this difficult. How are we to give thanks, when we are still so hungry? When our fellow members of Christ’s body are starving for this Sacrament of Unity and the consolation of corporate worship? When people around the world suffering Covid-19 are starving for breath? How are we to give thanks, when people of color are starving for justice in a society that wants to pretend that racism and white privilege is a thing of the past? 

Let us give thanks because in this great mystery we are nourished and confirmed in Christ’s life. And through our surrender to that life in us, Christ will bring together his scattered flock, Christ will heal and comfort his sick ones, and Christ will proclaim justice to the oppressed.

St. Augustine said about the Eucharist: “If you, therefore, are Christ's body and members, it is your own mystery that is placed on the Lord's table! It is your own mystery that you are receiving! You are saying "Amen" to what you are. …When you hear "The body of Christ", you reply "Amen." Be a member of Christ's body, then, so that your "Amen" may ring true!” (Augustine, Sermon 272, trans. NPNF Series)

Almighty God, deliver us from the presumption of coming to your Table for solace only, and not for strength; for pardon only, and not for renewal. Let the grace of this Holy Communion make us one body, one spirit in Christ, that we may worthily serve the world in his name. (BCP, p.372)
Amen. 

Sunday, June 7, 2020

Trinity Sunday - June 7, 2020

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Robert James Magliula, OHC

Genesis 1:1-2:4a
2 Corinthians 13:11-13
Matthew 28:16-20

Br. Robert James Magliula
For the visually-oriented among us, the mention of the Trinity conjures the 15th-century Rublev icon. That depiction of the Trinity conveys a silent stillness surrounding the three figures. They are not looking at, but into each other with an unqualified dignity, respect, and loving gaze. The fourth side of the table is open signaling an invitation for us to enter. As members of Christ’s body through Baptism, we participate in the divine nature and dance of the Trinity. We are not merely invited to watch the dance, but to dance the dance. We’re tempted to analyze and explain the Trinity by our intellect, but mystery can only be encountered by the heart.

God’s mystery in the Trinity rests in mutuality: three perfectly handing over, emptying themselves, and then fully receiving what has been handed over. In the Trinity, God models relationship for us as Christians and monastics. The first reading from Genesis sets the tone for how we encounter God. God is one, yet God creates, sustains, orders, preserves, provides, and loves. God blesses all creation. God engages with all that exists. Trinity is a paradigm of what it means to be human and to relate humanely to others. To say that God is Triune is to mean that God is social in nature. It is also to say that those made in God’s image are likewise intrinsically social. If we believe in a Trinitarian God, then we must hold fast to the truth that God is community—a completely loving, mutually self-giving, endlessly generative relationship between equal partners. 

Rublev Trinity Icon
The Rublev Trinity Icon
Henri Nouwen called the Trinity a “House of Love”. He wrote that in that household there is no fear, no greed, no anger, no violence, no anxieties, no pain, even no words, only enduring love and deepening trust.1 Could that description be any further from the truth of the outer and inner world in which we find ourselves today? In his book, Putting on the Mind of Christ, Jim Marion suggests that the Kingdom of Heaven is Jesus’ way of describing a state of transformed consciousness modeled in the Trinity. The Kingdom of Heaven is a metaphor and not a place you go to, but a place you come from.  It’s a new way of looking at the world, a transformed awareness that turns this world into a different place. The hallmark of this awareness is that it sees no separation—not between God and humans, not between humans and other humans. Jesus’ teaching to “Love your neighbor as yourself” is an admonition to love the other as a continuation of our very own being. It’s seeing that your neighbor is you. There are not two individuals, one seeking to better oneself at the expense of the other, or to extend charity to the other. Each is equally precious and necessary. This is the template for the sacred alchemy of the Trinity which is imprinted on our soul.2

In Chapter 54 of Dame Julian’s Showings, we find the best description of our union inside of the Trinity. Julian writes, “God makes no distinction in love between the blessed soul of Christ and the least soul that will be saved.”3 She is saying that God can only see Christ in us because we are the extended Body of Christ in space and time. Christ is what God sees and cannot not love and draw us back into the Divine Dance of Love. Julian continues: “And I saw no difference between God and our substance, but, as it were, all God; and still my understanding accepted that our substance is in God, that is to say that God is God, and our substance is a creature in God. For the almighty truth of the Trinity is our Father, for he made us and keeps us in him. And the deep wisdom of the Trinity is our Mother, in whom we are enclosed. And the high goodness of the Trinity is our Lord, and in him we are enclosed and he in us.”4 True union does not absorb distinctions, but actually intensifies them. The more one gives one’s self in creative union with another, the more one becomes one’s self. This is reflected in the Trinity, perfect giving and perfect receiving.

An African proverb states: “I am because we are.” Unlike Western society, it is not the individual but the community that is of critical importance. We’re seeing this value in action right now with so many  changing their habits, lives, and livelihoods at great personal cost for the sake of the global community.5 An extension of this understanding can be found in that of Ubuntu.  “A person with Ubuntu (full humanity) is open and available to others, affirming of others, does not feel threatened that others are able and good...."6 What Ubuntu underscores is “‘the vital importance of mutual recognition and respect complemented by mutual care and sharing in the construction of human relations.’7 Ubuntu is manifested in self-giving and readiness to cooperate and communicate with others.”8 This reminder that “I am because you are,” seems particularly important for our times, especially in this country. Even before social distancing began, loneliness, and the anxiety and depression that often accompany it, had reached epidemic proportions and I imagine those numbers will only increase with so many people being isolated by our circumstances. 

Our Epistle reminds us that Paul was no stranger to the joys and challenges of community life. He had lived with the community in Corinth for a couple of years and corresponded with them by letter on at least five occasions. He ends this painful letter with an appeal to order, mutual agreement, and peace. He offers them and us a Trinitarian perspective regarding community life. Believers do not belong to themselves, but to Christ, and relations among believers must reflect the One to whom they belong. He reminds them and us that when we cease to belong to Christ we give ourselves to inappropriate anger, destructive hatred, and perhaps worst of all for monastics, the poison of self-absorption. We revert to living from a place of scarcity, invariably protecting and defending what little we think we have or are, projecting our problem on someone or something else, rather than dealing with it in ourselves. Having someone to hate or blame is a relief, because it takes away our inner shame and anxiety and provides a false sense of innocence. As long as the evil is outside of us, we can keep our focus on condemning or changing someone else, rather than ourselves, which gives us a false sense of moral superiority and outrage. We don’t have to grow up, let go, forgive, or surrender—we just have to accuse someone else of being worse than we are. 

When we move away from the need to protect our own power, we mirror the Trinity where all power is shared, where there is no domination, threat, or coercion. Jesus took this difficult path to know the depths of suffering and yet to forgive reality for being what it is. Through great love or great suffering, the Spirit can teach us the paradox of conversion and transformation. Paul voices his assurance that we do not face this challenge alone, but with the love and grace of God, and the Holy Spirit’s power to create communion. Resurrection for us is not an isolated miracle as much as an enduring relationship. Death is not just the death of the physical body, but all the times we hit bottom and must let go of how we thought life should be, and surrender. We are going through many deaths these days. They are tipping points, opportunities to choose conversion. Death is final only for those who close ourselves to growth and new life.

Benedict insisted that we must learn to listen to what God is saying in our lives. The good zeal, the monastic zeal, commits us to human community, immerses us in Christ, and surrenders us to God, minute by minute, person by person, day after day. Benedict reminds us that sanctity is the stuff of community in Christ and that any other zeal is false. As we move forward, we need to not be afraid of darkness, of change, of uncertainty, of the things that look like they’re going in the wrong direction. Often what we face is the thing that needed to happen in order for there to be clarity. Jesus’ life and ministry reveals that God uses tragedy, suffering, pain, betrayal, and death itself, not to wound us, but to bring us to God. There are no dead ends. Everything can be transformed, and everything can be used. Trust that even when it seems that our world is moving backward—away from justice and peace. Even this tension can serve to move us in a new direction.  +Amen.
 

1 Henry Nouwen, Behold the Beauty of the Lord: Praying with Icons, (Ave Maria Press: 1987). p.19.

2 Jim Marion, Putting on the Mind of Christ, (Hampton Roads Publishing: 2000).

3 The Fourteenth Revelation, Ch. 59 (Long Text). See The Revelations of Divine Love of Julian of Norwich, trans. James Walsh (Harper and Brothers: 1961), 162.

4 The Sixteenth Revelation, Ch. 86 (Long Text), Colledge and Walsh, 342–343.

5 Laurenti Magesa, What Is Not Sacred?: African Spirituality (Orbis Books: 2013), 195. As cited by Hayes, p.45.

6 Desmond Mpilo Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness (Doubleday: 1999), p.31.

7 Mogobe B. Ramose, “The Ethics of Ubuntu,” The African Philosophy Reader: A Text with Readings, eds. P. H. Coetzee and A. P. J. Roux, 2nd ed. (Routledge: 2003), p.329.

8 Magesa, What Is Not Sacred?, p.13.