Tuesday, November 26, 2019

The Solemnity of James Otis Sargent Huntington - Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Aidan Owen, OHC
The Solemnity of James Otis Sargent Huntington - Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Nehemiah 5:1–12
Galatians 6:14–18
John 6:34–38

Click here for an audio version of this sermon.


In the name of the One God, who is Lover, Beloved, and Love Overflowing. Amen.

You know the man. He was, in Fr. Whittemore’s recollection, “a big man. He was holy. He had a massive intellect. His head and features were beautifully moulded. His lips were full, mobile, extraordinarily expressive. His large eyes looked through yours into the depths of your soul.”

You can still experience that gaze in the extraordinary pastel portrait of Father Huntington in the crypt. He still looks through you into the depths of your soul. But gently, sweetly, and tenderly.

“Our Father Founder was a born leader,” Fr. Whittemore continues. “Men followed him with devoted loyalty. He led. He never pushed. He had more respect for the liberty of everyone with whom he came in contact than anyone I have ever known.”

Yes, he was a leader, a founder, a visionary. He was a tireless advocate for justice for the working poor. He was also a devoted and humble servant of the community he founded, famously hating the title “Father Founder,” because he felt it separated him from his brothers, as it almost certainly has done.

I will admit to feeling some sympathy with this hesitance. In preparing for this sermon, I kept asking “what is uniquely holy about the Founder?” How is he, apart from the rest of our deceased or living brothers, particularly saintly?

Yes, he founded our Order. But he didn’t do so alone. He was simply the only one of our three founders who stayed. And yes, his thought, personality, and piety have shaped us, particularly through the treasury of his Rule. And yet, it is perhaps truer to say that the tension between Father Huntington’s personality and vision and that of Father Hughson have shaped and continue to shape us, supported all the while, by Father Whittemore’s remembrance of the early years and his gentle, unifying vision, which continues gives silent shape and structure to our sense of ourselves.

These three together, I would argue, were and continue to be the great, guiding lights of our common life.

Where, then, do Father Huntington’s particular sanctity and witness lie?

Father Whittemore remembers a particular and striking detail of the Founder’s life. He writes “The Father encouraged one to ‘live dangerously.’ He said to me once that each of the saints was within a hair’s breadth of being a heretic. Apparently what he meant was that the saints were not content with taking conventional ideas of religion ready-made and timidly or slothfully resting back on them but that they pushed their wills and affections and reasons to the uttermost in their courageous quest for Truth. Because it was indeed Truth that the saints sought and because they surrendered themselves to God at the cost of their own inclinations and sentiments they were preserved by Him from error and led on to fuller and fuller visions of His glory.”

Father Huntington’s great respect for the freedom of the individual—seen here particularly in his encouragement to ‘live dangerously,’—is, perhaps, his most palpable legacy to us, his children. He was so insistent on the importance of individual liberty that he came close to making an idol of it, so close as to be within a hair’s breadth of being a heretic.

We can see this in his enthusiasm for new ideas, in his instinctive “yes” when a member of the Order suggested a new course or ministry, in the careful attention he gave to his brothers and those under his care, and in his desire for the Order to develop the capacities of its individual members rather than to form pious automatons. He felt that, in general, “we should consecrate the things of this world not so much by their disuse as by using them for God’s glory.”

We can also see his fanaticism for the liberty of the individual in his reticence to offer his opinion in community meetings, lest he sway the common mind, a reticence that also shows up in his shyness and his apparent ambivalence about personal closeness. And we see it, too, in his reported unwillingness to say no to his brothers, even when it was in their own best interest that he curb their actions.

Why this focus on freedom?

The answer shines forth from his Rule, whose beating heart is its soaring passages on the surrender of the monk to God. He writes “We are to bear in mind that the vow of obedience is the portal of the religious state. That sate is constituted by a covenant wherein the soul gives itself, all its powers and faculties, together with the body and all material possessions, to God. […] From this it follows that obedience is the chief among the three vows of the religious state, since by obedience man offers to God the intellect, the will, the whole being, as not only a sacrifice but a holocaust.”

He goes on, “The virtue of obedience is the dying to self, to self-interest, self-pleasing, self-love. ‘Christ became obedient unto death, even the death of the Cross.’ […] We obey not that we may live more peacefully, but that we may die more perfectly. The peace will come only when the sharpness of self-annihilation has been felt, when, through death itself, we have entered into the liberty of the sons of God, and can say, ‘I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me.’”

True freedom can only be found in loving submission to the one who first modeled that submission for us. The submission of our monastic obedience, which is to say our free gift of ourselves to God through our common life, can only be accomplished to the degree that we are free to make that commitment. Only a free person can submit; otherwise we live in a kind of slavery, coerced by our needs, resentments, and fears.

The result of the free offering of our entire self to God is the perfect freedom of the children of God, where we, too, can say that Christ lives in us.

We see the fruits of this free self-offering in the Founder’s life, and they are the signs of his sanctity and the promise of our own. He was, in Father Whittemore’s recollection, “the most utterly pure and innocent adult I have ever known.”

That kind of innocence rises from the ashes of our self-immolation. It is not the innocence of children, of never having hurt or been hurt. Rather, it is an adult innocence and a Christian one. It is the innocence of one who has been found guilty of all charges, who has been forgiven utterly and completely, and who has been reborn beyond all understanding through the love and mercy of Jesus.

It is the kind of innocence that looks at what the world calls reasonable and laughs, not with derision, but with love and compassion for the confused muddle in which we find ourselves. This innocence is the peace that the world cannot give. And it is the source and the end of Christian hope.

In the end, it is perhaps Father Huntington’s innocence and that of all God’s saints that comes closest to heresy and to holiness. For in a world that is falling apart around us, none of us is free from evil’s stain. We all have blood on our hands, greed in our hearts, and pettiness on our tongues.

To trust so totally in the mercy of God that we can offer ourselves freely and completely—what foolishness that must seem to the world we live in. What foolishness it must seem to us, too, much of the time. To dare for the innocence of the redeemed really is to live dangerously, freely, and joyfully in a violent, chaotic, and beautiful world.

May God’s mercy bring each of us to that innocence and freedom of the children of God. And may Blessed James and all the saints intercede for us always. Amen.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Last Sunday after Pentecost - Sunday, November 24, 2019

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. John Forbis, OHC
Last Sunday After Pentecost - Christ the King - Sunday, November 24, 2019

Jeremiah 23:1-6
Colossians 1:11-20
Luke 23:33-43

We, Christians, are strange people. The world looks to royalty to be either imperial rulers or symbols of national pride and patriotism.

We worship one who is executed as a blasphemer and seditionist. He hangs between two thieves. We institute a feast in which we call him “King”. He never accepted this title himself. When Pilate tries to coerce him to admit he is a king, he responds cryptically, “You say that I am.”

He is a “King” who would not be King: an anti-king. We worship a man nailed to wood; a crown of thorns gouged into his head. He is an object of mockery and derision, including the pièce de résistance – a plaque above his head also calling him King of the Jews, a title reserved only for Herod.

The temptations from the Devil have come back to haunt him. The masses taunt him with familiar phrases, “If you are the Son of God, save yourself.” This execution surely must be the opportune time for the devil to return.

However, despite the jeers that taunt him to doubt God’s affirmation of him as the beloved Son with whom he is well pleased, the King Anti-King will not be averted from the one thing that is the culmination of his mission and fulfillment of his eminence as the Beloved Son of God.

He dies of his own will. He dies forgiving. He dies promising paradise to a thief. He commends himself into God’s hands.

Yes, we, Christians, are strange people indeed. If we are suffering, we are not compelled to look for the quick fix, to desperately seek out comfort and avoidance of conflict – the immediate gratification compensating for our pain and loss. Instead, we are urged to endure … to exercise patience, exude joy and gratitude for sharing in others’ pain, saints in light and embrace God’s grace and transformation pouring from God’s own grieving heart. This costs the King/anti-King everything and costs God his Beloved.

He is also the anti-King who tells us, as we read just two days ago, that unless we are like children, vulnerable and dependent upon God, we will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven. If we refuse or hinder these children, ourselves and each other, we are refusing Christ, and if we’re refusing Christ, we might as well don a millstone around our necks and jump into the sea and drown in its depths.

This King who would not be King advises us to cut off our hand and foot, tear out our eye and throw them away if they cause us to stumble. Blindness, lameness and being maimed are preferable to the alternative, says the one whose sense of his intimate and familial relationship with God is placed into jeopardy by the devil’s attempt to cause him to stumble and the devil’s anti-victory at his Crucifixion.

But how can he expect us to submit to such horrors?

Well, he is a broken man, derided, mocked, taunted, tortured. Blood blinds his eyes from his ghastly crown, streams from his hands and feet and finally from a deep gash in his side. He is lame, maimed and blind.

The other bitter reality is that I am quite capable to play many roles in this grotesquerie. I could be a Roman soldier vying for his purple cloak, a self-righteous religious judge fooling myself that I am proving Jesus wrong, a blasphemer, a charlatan. I am a part of the crowd who jeers and mocks and can’t turn myself away from the voyeuristic fascination of this blood feast. I could even be one of his crucifiers.

We are drowning, lame, maimed, blind who have no idea what we are doing, people who has and does betray others, ourselves and most of all, God. Yet, from his terrible anti-throne of suffering, Jesus speaks forgiveness. He doesn’t just invite us into his kingdom that is not a kingdom.

It’s a foregone conclusion. We will be and are today with him in nothing less than paradise! A place beyond anything we can ask or imagine, a power of complete surrender, emptying and sacrifice, an anti-power beyond time and space as we know it.

Jesus promises eternity. The Resurrection follows, it has happened. It happens still. It happens now as we celebrate this feast in this place. This paradise permeates all that we do and are, how we are creatively transformed and reconciled to God, how we welcome, clear the way and serve the child to enter community with us as Jesus welcomes and opens the way of life and wholeness for the thief

Not only does Jesus subvert the image of king, but he subverts whom we blindly think and concede we are, a people consigned to greed, self-interest, ignorance, hatred and violence. A gang of crucifiers or ingratiators to kings for our own advancement, a concession to being irredeemable, beyond mercy and forgiveness.

Just when we are drowning in and crippled by tyranny, Christ’s love is stronger than death. As I am seduced, duped into blame and indifference, Christ, the victim of all of these abuses, offers forgiveness for what he endures from and for us. To a criminal consumed by guilt and self-punishment, seeking connection and recognition, he offers not hope but a promise.

From Christ’s anti-throne, the cross, the anti-King lords over nothing. He gives up power for which we can commit the most heinous acts. The anti-King refuses retaliation and vengeance for which we vehemently clamor or coldly expect. In death he insists on life, love and healing.

As Christ is defeated and deposed from his anti-reign he chose for himself, he becomes the triumph of God’s transformative life beyond time, wholeness that gathers us, the crippled remnant, from wherever we are scattered into God’s paradise and love that overcomes tyranny, destruction, violence and finally death. Amen.

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Pentecost 23C - Sunday, November 17, 2019

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Bernard Jean Delcourt, OHC
Pentecost 23C - Proper 28 - Sunday, November 17, 2019

Isaiah 65:17-25
2 Thessalonians 3:6-13
Luke 21:5-19

Click here for an audio version of the sermon.

The book of Isaiah is the second-most quoted book of the Hebrew Scriptures in the New Testament (after the book of Psalms). If the book of Psalms was Jesus’ book of common prayer, the book of Isaiah was known to him enough that, when handed the scroll of that book, he could find exactly the passage he wanted to read from (Luke 4:17).

In many ways, Jesus’s birth, life, ministry, death and resurrection are the embodiment of prophetic utterances in the book of Isaiah. We are soon to enter a season of expectant hope, Advent. The season of Advent looks both backward and forward to the realizations of such hopes.

Today’s text from Isaiah offers a vision of this expectant hope. God the ever-creative momentum of the universe is about to create new heavens and a new earth. The text is sometimes understood to refer to the end times.

But when God says “I AM,” “I AM about to create” doesn’t that speak of the eternal now, this very instant we are living? God is impatient for this new creation to break into our world. God is not waiting till the end of times for this to be realized.

Jesus himself says the Kingdom of God, this new creation, is in the midst of us (Luke 17:21). God desires us as co-creators of the new Jerusalem. If we consent, we can be instruments of God’s dream for creation.

This new creation that God is about to reveal is not a utopia, as in a dream that has no place in reality. This new creation demands our engagement in the gospel of Jesus Christ every day of our life.

*****

The third author of the book of Isaiah who speaks to us in today’s passage was addressing the Jewish people who were just returning from exile. They were discovering a distraught and destroyed Jerusalem. They had to start anew in very difficult conditions.

They might very well have chosen to weep and mourn former things that were no more. Or they might also stand with the Creator-God, let past things be in the past, and build a new Jerusalem.

And the prophet Isaiah gives us a wondrous list of characteristics of this new Jerusalem. Some characteristics might sound like the electoral program of a presidential hopeful. Mind you, our politicians could do worse than take a leaf out of Isaiah.

First of all, the new Jerusalem is a city. We are not going back to the Garden of Eden where we could be alone with God. We are looking at a civil society where we build our future together. We will relate to God as a community. We will thrive together. We can’t do this alone. God is enrolling every available laborer in this project.

We are no longer going to dwell on our losses and our past glories. We are going to be forward-looking.

We will be healthier, more joyful and more prosperous than we can imagine. We will live out fulfilled lifetimes.

We will have economic justice. All will have fruitful livelihoods and will be able to enjoy the fruit of those livelihoods. There shall not be domination over our lives or exploitation of our labor.

We will be happy that our children get to enjoy what we will enjoy ourselves. We won’t worry about their future being bleaker than our present.

And then, as a fledgling Vegan, I can’t help but rejoice at the thought that wolves and lions are going Vegan too (although I aspire to better than a meal of straw).

Think of all the ways we can engage our present predicaments to move into this direction and usher in the Kingdom of God here and now. You don’t need to cure cancer (but if you can, by all means, please do). You can start with offering a cool glass of water to those in need. Every little action in favor of our common good counts in this endeavor.

And God will cooperate with you every step of the way. God will delight in your consent to build the new Jerusalem with God. God will rejoice in your collaboration.

And with God, you will remove the causes of weeping and distress. Before people cry for help, we will come to their aid. We shall be the answer to people’s prayers.

Of course, some also draw comfort from the thought that no matter how short we fall from embodying the vision, God will complete it in the end. At the end of times, God will make perfect what we have started to accomplish with God.

Well yes, probably, but why wait until then? Insisting on Isaiah’s vision being an eschatological vision, a vision of the end times only, seems like a cop out to me. Why labor at building the new Jerusalem, when God the Creator himself will finish it off in a New York minute at the end of times? Why bother? We don’t know when time will end. My understanding of Jesus’ life, ministry, death and resurrection is that God desires us to try and help in the meantime.

I want Isaiah’s vision to inform my life and that of our Christian community. It is a vision that has universal appeal. We can share it with all of humanity and all of God’s creation. It is truly a vision for the greater common good of all creation.

Remember this vision throughout the coming season of Advent. Etymologically, Advent means “what is to come.” Remember the advent of Jesus of Nazareth, of Jesus the Christ and of the new Jerusalem he prefigures.


Beloved Lord, thank you for Isaiah’s rendering of God’s vision of a new Jerusalem. Thank you for Jesus emboldening us in the building of the Kingdom of God here and now. Help us join the multitude of your laborers no matter how late the hour. We look forward to sharing the fruits of our labor with all and with You. Amen.

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Pentecost 22C - Sunday, November 10, 2019

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Randy Greve, OHC
Pentecost 22C - Proper 27 - Sunday, November 10, 2019

Job 19:23-27a
2 Thessalonians 2:1-5, 13-17
Luke 20:27-38

Click here for an audio version of the sermon.


“Don’t confuse me with the facts.  My mind is made up.”

The source of the saying is unclear.  We can imagine who might say it.  It is a long list…  Our cultural moment is awash in minds made up.  It is a good, old-fashioned American value to have made up one’s mind.  Nice if the facts agree with the thing about which one’s mind is made up, but not always required!  Why let facts ruin a good story?  Made-up minds are strong, resolute, determined, immovable.  The culture idolizes people who know – or at least act like they know.  Sometimes we even elect them to office.  Having arrived at a made-up mind is a state not without a certain appeal.  What is the alternative?  Who wants to be defined as wishy-washy, lacking backbone, following the crowd, going with the flow?  That all sounds rather limp.  Molly Ivins, the late columnist and author from Texas expressed this idea in the images of my home state: “There is nothing in the middle of the road but a yellow line and dead squirrels.”  Civilized conversations across differences are rare.  Compromise is a dirty word.  It is easier to demonize and despise than to dialogue.  We may seem particularly polarized, locked in our minds that know and safely sequestered in our appropriate tribes, but we are not the first people to be so dangerously drawn into dualism.  This is as old a game as the Garden of Eden and we encounter a classic example in the Gospel for today.

Luke is the gospel of universality, portraying a Jesus who eagerly seeks out the rejected, outcast, unclean, and unwell and brings healing, forgiveness, community, and hope.  In teaching and miracle and parable Jesus declares the divine “yes” to each person without exception.  But Luke is no utopian fantasy story where everyone takes Jesus up on his offer.  The human “no” is always possible.  Frighteningly real and easy.  If heaven is likened to a banquet thrown in honor of one and all, a celebration of endless abundance and outrageous joy, then hell is the decision to stand outside the party, alone, in the darkness, and refuse to go in, refuse to break bread with tax collectors and prostitutes and lepers.  Those outside believe it is better to keep their hearts safe in its casket of judgment rather than to dignify such a blasphemous gathering of human scum.  My mind is made up.

The Sadducees in the gospel reading were skilled in the mind-making business, especially in how much better they were than, well, just about everybody.  They were a priestly sect that only accepted the Torah, the first five books, as authoritative.  We enter the scene in the early days of Holy Week.  Jesus is teaching in the temple in Jerusalem, and attracting large and enthusiastic crowds, much to the consternation of the Sadducees who come to pose this convoluted scenario to Jesus.  The Sadducees found no reference to the resurrection or life after death in the Torah, so they rejected it, though later writings begin to form an idea of resurrection, the Sadducees held onto to a hard-core purist position.  The question to Jesus is, like the question about paying taxes to Caesar, a no-win trap to which there is no straight answer that will not add to the already deep divisions about these issues.  “Do you read the text correctly, Jesus, or are you an enemy?”, they sneer.  So, with the crowds listening for his answer, the Sadducees know that if they can publicly shame him, catch him without an answer, or at least without a good one, the crowds will see him as a disgraced charlatan and move on, order restored, problem solved.

Jesus knows what is going on, of course.  His response turns the tables on them and uses their own sacred texts, his example of Moses at the burning bush is from Exodus 6, to make a point about life after death.  God, he says, did not cease to be God to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob after they died.  “I am their God”, Yahweh proclaims to Moses, present tense.  If the patriarchs are alive, then everyone is alive in God.  Welcome to Bible study with Jesus, who probably has some good things to say about what the text means.  His way of using the text is as important as the content.  He is giving us an example of sacred reading.

Once when leading a retreat for a parish group here over a weekend, I allowed some time for questions during one of the sessions and someone asked, “Do you ever get bored reading the same psalms over and over again?”  Without thinking, I said, “we don’t read the same psalms.”  The answer is about a basic set of attitudes and assumptions about reading sacred scripture.  The Bible is not a static history book from which I extract a finite amount of data.  It is alive, breathed into.  The inspiration happens in the interplay, the event, the dance between text and reader out of which something new is eternally possible.  I don’t read the same psalms or any scripture the same way twice because I am not the same – my needs and questions are ever changing.

What is clear from Jesus’ use of the story of Moses at the burning bush is that Jesus had read the text.  He had listened to it, pondered it, noticed things about it.  He had connected stories together.  That God uses the present tense, “I am” the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob means something.  And because of that reading, Jesus can upturn a trap question about marriage customs designed to embarrass him by referencing a story that speaks of the very identity of God.  The question, Jesus is saying, is not “how do I get my doctrinal details and ethical conformity to every law so close to the text that I become the super-righteous person I am expected to be”.  The deeper and more important questions are; “who is God, how does God come to us and invite us into relationship and promise to be faithfully present to us even into eternity?”

The Sadducees did not read like this.  They found in the text what they wanted in order to perpetuate a system of temple control and power that benefited them.  Their agenda created a bias that turned the text into a weapon with which they could attack their enemies.  The Torah contains many commands to the people to show respect to the foreigner, generosity to widows and orphans, welcome to the stranger, and compassion to all – a revolutionary ethic that said treat others as God has treated you.  The Sadducees, if they had read carefully, should have seen in Jesus an embodiment of all that the Torah says about neighborliness, a call back to the heart of God’s covenant with a people for the whole world, and then welcomed Jesus with joyful gratitude as Messiah.  Instead, the Sadducees’ reading of the Torah, in seeking to discredit and defame Jesus - who only ever did good and obeyed God - conveniently skipped over those passages.  Their stubborn refusal to let go of their power and status in exchange for the wonder of God’s truth will keep them outside the party. 

If we read the Bible solely to justify our positions so that we can insult and demean the other in error, or even just different from us, it is not the Bible we are reading.  Have you ever thought, “Don’t confuse me with what the Bible says, my mind is made up”?  As a professor of mine liked to say, “Don’t be so open-minded that your brains fall out”, but be open-minded and open-hearted enough to be bothered.  If you sincerely read the whole thing, especially the parts you do not like, you will be bothered.  The Bible inspires us with truth, encourages us, moves us with its beauty, but don’t stop there, keep going.  It talks about justice, money, possessions, generosity, service, love.   It bothers us.  Read it again.  Or, actually, read it as if for the first time.  This reading is not about fully grasping those mysteries, but remembering the first rule of theology: God is God, you are not.  Sacred reading is the decision to enter more consciously into the presence of God in reverence, ready to be instructed, consoled, or corrected, as God’s voice speaks in the text.

The correction part is the hardest and most uncomfortable.  Notice that Jesus told the Sadducees they were wrong, “and the fact that the dead are raised Moses himself showed in the story about the bush…”  He rejects their misreading and corrects it.  He resists nonviolently and non-judgmentally, however, with a view toward opening their minds and hearts to perceive the truth.  Reading in this way will give the text access to us, to mirror back to us what it has to say about our minds, our privilege, our attitudes, and invites us to honesty.  God then unmakes the mind that we so quickly make, and makes it into the mind of Christ.  We are headed toward the last day.  We can’t go into the party with a God of our own making.  We can only enter the banquet feast as guests of the God who is.  Jesus here is showing us how to be liberated from our stubbornness and inviting us into a life of grace that is wide enough to allow God to do in us and others what we cannot do alone.

Many times, Jesus could have entered the power game, taken a side, and demonized those labelled less holy and worthy than him – which would have been everybody.  That is what fanatics do, and Jesus is not a fanatic.  Jesus is a radical.  Fanatics define themselves by us versus them.  Radicals believe that in the depths of our being we long most for communion and community even more than competition and rivalry.  Radicals believe something better is possible in our relationships, that the great shared feast is real, and it is coming.  Where fanatics want to trap, radicals want to liberate.  Listen to your thoughts and words – radicals use words like “children of God”, “all”, and “alive” and turn the world upside down.

O God, bother us.  Expand our made-up minds, enlarge our constricted hearts.  Remind us that our holy reading reveals how much more there is to know of your infinitely mysterious yet revealed and present grace.  No, Molly, there is more in the middle of the road than just a yellow line and dead squirrels.  The middle place is the holy place, the meeting place, the middle of the road is where the bridge across the divide that tears us apart is waiting to be built, where possibilities are born, where one hand extended in friendship toward another is the beginning of a peace that will last and a justice that will never fail.  After the arguments, the positions, the schisms, the elections – after all the walls are down and all the labels peeled off and there is no more “us versus them” but only one great holy “we”, after the conquests of nations are swallowed up by the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, what lasts forever is life, real resurrection life, a party.  Come on inside.

Sunday, November 3, 2019

Pentecost 21C - Sunday, November 3, 2019

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Robert Pierson, OHC
Pentecost 21C - Proper 26 - Sunday, November 3, 2019

Isaiah 1:10-18
2 Thessalonians 1:1-4, 11-12
Luke 19:1-10

Click here for an audio version of the sermon.

The prophet Isaiah says, “Hear the word of the Lord....Trample my courts no more; bringing offerings is futile; incense is an abomination to me.”  So there....I guess we've been told.  Luckily we no longer put much stock in animal sacrifices or even cereal offerings, but what about our incense?  We do use a lot of it around here.

Of course, we are not meant to hear this passage literally, and yes, I did take it completely out of context.  The actual point that the prophet is making is in the next verse:  “I cannot endure solemn assemblies with iniquity.”  God is not interested in our religiosity if it is not supported by a concern for justice, and care for the poor, and the oppressed.  We can't hide our sinfulness behind religious ritual or even pious prayers.  God sees right through that.  God calls us to “remove the evil of your doings from before my eyes; cease to do evil, learn to do good; seek justice, rescue the oppressed, defend the orphan, plead for the widow.”

My guess is that most, if not all of us, are concerned for the poor and oppressed --to a point.  And it's at that point that we need to hear what the prophet Isaiah is saying today.  Can we be more concerned than we are?  Should we be more concerned than we are for those who lack the basics of life?  Well, at least none of us are as out of touch with the needs of our neighbors as Zacchaeus was.

The gospel story today tells us that Zacchaeus “was a chief tax collector and was rich.”  As we know, tax collectors were Jewish people who worked for the Romans to collect tax money to be sent to Rome.  They weren't paid, but were expected to collect their own living expenses by charging more than was owed to Rome, and keeping the rest for themselves.  If Zacchaeus was a rich man, then we can assume that he was a very skilled extortionist.  He knew how to get lots of money from people, and they resented him for it.  That's why people were so upset when Jesus paid him attention.

And it's interesting that Jesus knew who he was.  Zacchaeus wanted to see who Jesus was.  Evidently they had never met, but Jesus knew who that man in the tree was even before he was introduced.  Zacchaeus was that notorious.  And if Jesus knew who he was, he knew what kind of person he was, just as everyone else did.  But Jesus didn't preach to Zacchaeus; he didn't correct or criticize him, or even acknowledge his reputation.  Jesus simply reached out to Zacchaeus, and invited himself to “stay” at his house.  It's understandable that the people around were upset.  Why would Jesus want to stay with a tax collector? And a rich one, at that. Doesn't he know what kind of man this is?

I think Jesus knew exactly what he was doing.  His open, loving invitation to Zacchaeus caused a tremendous conversion to take place.  Now, all of a sudden, Zacchaeus is offering to give half of what he owns to the poor.  And he even admits that he might have defrauded some people, and is willing to pay them back four times as much.  Jesus' merciful approach to Zacchaeus completely disarms him and enables him to seek to do the right things regarding his neighbors.  When Jesus preaches, he doesn't speak to Zacchaeus but rather to the crowd, reminding them that Zacchaeus is “a son of Abraham,” a member of the Jewish community just as much as they are.

So let's return for a moment to Isaiah's concern about the poor and oppressed.  We don't need to get defensive about our lack of attention to the poor.  We are called, like Zaccheus, to recognize that we are all in this together, that we are all members of the human family and that we must be concerned for those who have less than we do because we owe it to them to share what we have rather than hoard it for ourselves.  Like Zacchaeus, Jesus' love and mercy for us empowers us to be loving and merciful to others in need.  We are moved to act, not out of guilt, but rather out of gratitude for all that God has done for us.

We hope that Paul might say of us what he said about the people of Thessalonika:  “your faith is growing abundantly, and the love of everyone of you for one another is increasing....To this end we always pray for you, asking that our God will make you worthy of his call and will fulfill by his power every good resolve and work of faith, so that the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and you in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Friday, November 1, 2019

All Saints Year C - Friday, November 1, 2019

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Robert James Magliula, OHC
All Saints - Proper 25 - Sunday, October 27, 2019

Daniel 7:1-3,15-18
Ephesians 1:11-23
Luke 6:20-31

Throughout history humans have had a strong appreciation for and connection with their ancestors. I think the notion of oneness is what Christians were trying to verbalize when they made a late addition to the ancient Apostles’ Creed: “I believe in the communion of saints.” They were offering us the idea that the dead are at one with the living. This feast of All Saints entered the Christian tradition in the 4th century with a focus on relation and remembrance. What we are up to today is recognizing our sainthood and remembering those who have gone before us---all of us joined in this communion of saints. In such company we find comfort in our losses, courage for daily struggles, and hope as we face the future together.

The passage from Ephesians offers a commanding declaration about faith and salvation. The writer declares that the church is made up of those who chose to hope in Christ. The ending prayer for the Ephesians proposes a way which God, through Christ, brings all who believe into unity---a unity in time and across time. Those who have died and those who are living are one in Christ. Those who have died are already raised and those who are living are already marked for resurrection through baptism. The oneness of all things in Christ is our inheritance as saints. We are all in this together.

We live in and through one another. We become ourselves only through a process of mutual becoming. It begins in God’s own creative, self-giving love. Our core identity rests in that divine Love that birthed us all. This kind of mutual interdependence I have sensed to be true with the death of those closest to me. We are all one, just at different stages, all loved corporately by and in God. We are saved not by being privately perfect, but by being part of the whole, part of the Body that is Christ. This echoes the biblical concept of a covenant love granted to the Jewish people as a whole, and never just to one individual.

Consider how this awareness of reality upends so many of our current obsessions about private worthiness, reward and punishment, gender, race, class distinctions, and possessions. Weighing, measuring, counting, listing, labeling, and comparing go so far. The Gospel is about learning to live and die together in and with God. The good news is that God is saving and redeeming the Whole first and foremost, and we are all caught up in this Divine Love. We are the blessed beneficiaries, the partly willing participants in the Whole. Unless and until we can enjoy this, so much of what passes for Christianity will amount to little more than well-disguised narcissism and self-referential politics. Mature religion is meant to realign what our egos and survival instincts have put asunder, namely the fundamental wholeness at the heart of everything.

The source of our disease and violence is separation from parts of ourselves, from each other, and from God. Our shadow is any part of ourselves or our institutions that we try to hide or deny. Nonviolence, weakness, and simplicity are part of the American shadow. The larger and deeper shadow for Western individuals and culture is actually failure itself. Our success-driven culture scorns failure, powerlessness, and any form of poverty. We reject vulnerability and seek dominance instead, and we elect leaders who falsely promise us the same. In the United States today, white dominant culture prizes competition, urgency, individualism, and logic. Cooperation, self-care, and community are seen as inferior. Our Gospel today incorporates failure into a new definition of spiritual success. Luke shows that Jesus is fulfilling God’s compassion by living it with the oppressed and those on the margins and convicting those who are certain that they are righteous. Jesus begins his Sermon on the Mount by praising “the poor”! That should tell us how thoroughly we have missed the point of the Gospel. We avoid the very things that Jesus praises as we try to project a strong, secure, successful image to ourselves and the world. The beatitudes offer a foundation for holy living, clarifying, strengthening, and directing us in this life.

The early Church understood overcoming divisions as part of its mandate, emphasizing connectedness, oneness in Christ. Being Church means overcoming barriers. We cause so much harm and lose so much possibility by fearing our differences. Ultimate power is grounded not in rulers and authorities, but in God. Christ’s authority is evident in the church of which Christ is the head, and which shares in the fullness of salvation already, even as that fullness is being fulfilled.

To refuse the dark side is to store up the darkness. We are dealing with the accumulation of a whole society that has worshiped its light side and refused the dark. We know the plagues of bad things in our day as war, economic chaos, strikes, racial intolerance, gun violence, imprisoning refugees, and climate change.  Daniel knew those of his day and he reminds us of God’s promise to redeem, even in the face of injustice.  It’s easy to become disillusioned and to give up hope. But for the saints, God’s ultimate stand against all evil is sealed in the death and resurrection of Christ.

Any repair of our fractured world must start with those who have the insight and courage to own their shadow, so as to tap into greater compassion and creativity to live as our True Self—which is Love. We come to full consciousness by facing our own contradictions, mistakes, and failings. There is no shortage of opportunities to discover our personal or corporate shadow, especially in a monastic community. According to Jung, “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.” [1] God cannot be found out there until God is first found within ourselves. Then we can naturally see God in others and in all of creation. What we seek is what we are. The search for God and the search for our True Self are finally the same search. To fail in this is to deny one’s own sainthood and to miss the purpose of life.

Paul prays for his hearers that their hearts may be enlightened, so that they may know the hope to which Christ calls them. When we see only with our eyes or hear only with our ears, we may fail to claim the hope instilled in us. To see with the heart is to imagine the future which God is preparing. As Christians we are shaped by more than our experiences; we are shaped by our hopes, by the future into which we are living, and by the convictions by which we are living. Hope is best perceived with the eyes of the heart. Hope is best lived within a hopeful community, in the company of the saints, living and departed. Our feast today invites each of us to claim our place in their company.  +Amen.


[1] C. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, recorded and edited by Aniela Jaffé, trans. Richard and Clara Winston (Vintage Books: 1989), 247.