Sunday, November 26, 2017

The Feast of Christ the King, Year A: November 26, 2017

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Aidan Owen, OHC
Christ the King - Sunday, November 26,2017

To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.



Br. Aidan Owen, OHC
I always find today, the Feast of Christ the King, to be a bit troubling and disjointed. As the collect for the day reminds us, this is meant to be a feast of the final unity of all creation. And yet, at least on the surface, today’s gospel reading is not about unity at all.

At the end of time, Matthew tells us, Jesus will return to separate, not to unite, and to send some into everlasting life and others into the outer darkness.

And then there’s the whole king thing. I went to Union Seminary, so my ears are acutely tuned for the tintinnabulation of patriarchy and empire. Even for those who don’t approach scripture from a feminist, anti-imperial standpoint, it should trouble anyone who models her life on scripture that we celebrate Christ as a king.

Scripture doesn’t have good things to say about kings. Remember when the Israelites complain about how all the other people have kings and so they want one, too? Through Samuel God lets the people know what a king will be like:

“He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle[c] and donkeys he will take for his own use. He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.” (1 Sam 8:11-18)

The sense of this passage is clear: kings are bad news. They only want to take from you to support themselves in luxury.

Then, of course, we have Jesus, who continually rejects kingship throughout his ministry. After he multiplies the loaves and fish, he withdraws to a deserted place, as John tells us, because he knew the people intended to make him king. Later, when Pilate asks him if he is king of the Jews, he says, “you say that I am.”

Jesus used many names and images to convey the work he was about. He is Son of Humanity, Messiah, the True Bread, Living Water, the Word, the Way, the Truth, and the Life. The only time he is King is when his tormentors are mocking him. So why do we insist on using an image and a title for Jesus the Christ that he rejected?

For the early Christian communities, to call Christ King was to assert that Ceasar was not ultimate. In the context of the Roman Empire, to assert the kingship of Christ was a subversive act. But the same cannot be said of us today. We Western Christians are not living as people marginalized by empire. Far from it. We are the empire. If you don’t believe me, look around. This building, as beautiful as it is, is an imitation of an imperial meeting hall. These vestments we wear, lovely as they are, are stylized forms of imperial regalia. And the elaborate form of our Eucharistic feast, again as meaningful as it is to us, has very little of the intimate meal of Jesus’ body and blood that our early Christian forbears would have known. We often still live with the myth that the empire became Christian under Constantine. How far from the truth. The empire never became Christian. Instead, institutional Christianity became imperial.

I believe we need seriously to ask ourselves: In this context, can a feast celebrating the kingship of Christ still be a subversive act? Or does it, as a friend of mine so eloquently put it, merely draw us back into the muscle memory of empire? Is the image of Christ as a king something that can be purified to guide the Church and the world into deeper healing? Or is it an image that needs to die so that something new can be born in its place?

I suspect there is a deeper reason we celebrate this feast of Christ’s kingship. Like our ancestors the Israelites, we, too, want a king. In a world that has been and continues to be devastated by the forces of empire, by racism, hatred, environmental degradation, colonialism, sexual abuse, misogyny, capitalism, and all the rest of the evil that plagues our world, we want a king to set things right. We want a savior who will intervene and bring order to chaos, who will vanquish those who do evil (who are, not surprisingly, also those with whom we disagree). We want the final triumph of good over evil.

But this life is not an action movie. There is no hero who is going to come and save us from ourselves. While I understand the desire for that kind of saving king, it relies on a childish fantasy religion, divorced from the reality we live in. And, furthermore, it is a fantasy that is not rooted in the gospel.

Returning to today’s gospel lesson, though, we see that Jesus has in mind something far better than kings, far better even than himself as king. Jesus offers us his own heart, beating within us, his own blood flowing through us, his own breath lifting our chests, and his own sight lightening our vision. Jesus offers us his very life to be our own.

If we can begin to listen to this story of the sheep and the goats with the ear of our heart, rather than with ears trained to the imperial drumbeat, it takes on a different valence entirely. We seem to read it as prescriptive—as showing us the way to get to heaven one day—but it isn’t. It is descriptive. It reveals to us a deeper reality already present among us. This story is not about what will happen someday. Rather, it is a description of the reality of today that is hidden from our sight. The story serves a set of lenses that reveals reality right here and now.

St. Benedict, in his rule for monks, provides for the excommunication from the community of those who break the bonds of fraternity. When a monk breaks the rule or disregards his relationships to the rest of his community or to God, he is excluded from table fellowship. He must eat at a different time and in a different place from the rest of the community. To drive the point further home, the rest of the community is forbidden even to talk with him. The idea is that, by his actions, this brother has already excluded himself from the unifying fellowship of the community. His punishment, so to speak, emphasizes the choices he has made in order to show him the deeper reality of exclusion he has already enacted by his choices. At the same time, however, that brother is never left entirely alone. The abbot deputes mature and wise brothers from the community to council the errant one and to work to bring him back into the fold.

A similar dynamic is at work with these sheep and goats.

The sheep are those who already live in the beloved community, here and now, because, whether they are conscious of it or not, they live in love with Christ in themselves, the people around them, and the whole created world. They hear the shepherd’s voice calling to them in every molecule of this hurting, bleeding world. They follow that voice within themselves and in everyone they meet. They know that whatever challenges they face along the way, the voice of the shepherd is leading them back home. Furthermore, they don’t rely on their own intelligence and strength. Rather, they understand that the whole is so much greater than they are, and that the fellowship of the beloved community is itself union with God. These sheep already live in heaven, because no matter how brutalized the world they serve, there they find Christ. They are never without God, because they see and seek God in everything, all the time. They not only exclude nothing from their experience of God, but they actually move into deeper communion with the Holy One in the most extreme and horrific instances of life. In other words, there is nothing in their experience of this life that excludes the presence of Christ. Everything draws them deeper into God.

By contrast, the goats, stubborn and independent, refuse to follow any voice but their own. What they love, they call good. They are so consumed with themselves that they never realize that all the time Christ’s life is shining all around them. Like the errant brother in Benedict’s rule, the goats have exiled themselves by their own choices and by their inability to enter, here and now, into the heavenly realm. These are the ones who pick and choose their experiences of God. Who judge good and bad, and seek Christ only where it is comfortable for them to do so. These goats already live in hell, because they deny themselves communion with Christ in the world around them and the caverns of their own hearts.

The sheep know that to get to heaven, you have to go to hell, because that is where Christ lives. The goats never get to haven, because they refuse to go to hell.

We have no need to wait for some future time for Christ’s glory to be revealed. Eternity is right now, and heaven and hell surround us in every single moment. Whether we live in heaven or whether we live in hell has everything to do with our willingness to enter the wholeness of our life right this very moment. If we want to know and love Christ, we have only to look around.

Jesus doesn’t say that when we tend to the marginalized and the poor, he is sitting there, watching, smiling, and approving of our actions. He says that he is the poor and the marginalized and the outcast of the world. Not that he is with them. He is them. This is a very important distinction. And he is us, too, whenever we are weak and vulnerable and hurting.

The throne of glory of which Jesus speaks is the growling belly of an immigrant woman who has less than $5 a day to feed her family. The blood that flows through Jesus’ veins is the dirty water of our inner cities, poisoned with lead and given to poor children of color. His flesh is the scarred and desiccated coal mines of West Virginia and the soot-stained skin of poor working whites in Appalachia.

And yes, Christ’s throne is also our own hearts, broken by whatever afflictions have plagued our lives, by the shame, the fear, the abuse, the unmet longings of our own deep hearts.

But there is another call in this text as well. If we are to be the sheep who see and love Christ in the most broken people and places in this world, then we must begin to see Christ in the goats, too. Can we seek Christ in the brokenness and the disordered consumption of the empire in which we live? Can we begin to recognize empire as a pathology, to understand that the forces of empire destroy and maim the souls even of those who benefit most from its systems of privilege, commodification, and oppression? Can we see that those maimed souls are often our own, and that, Christ lives there, too? Can we depute wise and mature sheep to the goats, to bring them back into the fold?

We have no need to wait for our salvation. Our salvation is already here. We are already saved, now, in this place, already whole, already holy. We have merely to ask for eyes to see and ears to hear Christ within and all around us.

This Christ may be a king, but if he is, we must also remember that his crown is thorns and his throne is a cross. His kingship explodes every meaning of that word, and it looks nothing like any kingship this earth has ever seen. For myself, I long for a different word than king, a word yet to be uttered by human lips, a word that is more silence than speech. And I’ll pray for the ears to hear that word in the searching gaze of my human brothers and sisters, of the devastated and majestic earth we live on, and in the cave of my own heart.

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Feast of James Huntington: November 19, 2017

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Josép R. Martínez-Cubero, OHC
Feast of James Huntington- Saturday, November 25, 2017

To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.

Br. Josép R. Martínez-Cubero, OHC
We, unaccustomed to courage exiles from delight
live coiled in shells of loneliness
until love leaves its high holy temple
and comes into our sight
to liberate us into life.


Love arrives
and in its train come ecstasies
old memories of pleasure
ancient histories of pain.


Yet if we are bold,
love strikes away the chains of fear
from our souls.


We are weaned from our timidity
In the flush of love's light
we dare be brave
And suddenly we see
that love costs all we are
and will ever be.


Yet it is only love
which sets us free.



Today, we celebrate Father James Otis Sargent Huntington as the founder of our Order, a title he never wanted. And perhaps the fact that he never wanted to be thought of as the founder is the more reason to celebrate him. And, indeed, it is right to give thanks for his life, his faithfulness, his vision, his perseverance, and his love. The founding of what came to be the Order of the Holy Cross was born out of a conversation between Fr. Huntington and Fr. Robert Stockton Dod. It was Fr. Dod who led Fr. Huntington and Fr. James Cameron who soon after joined them, in the formation of community life beginning in the autumn of 1881. It was Fr. Dod who was the first Superior, and who wrote the first Rule of the Order. But both Dod and Cameron left within the next two years. I would bet that possibilities were not lacking for the intelligent, confident and charismatic twenty-nine-year-old Fr. Huntington. But he chose to stay the course, and that's why we are here today. He was not the more dominant character of the three, but the stronger. As Br. Adam McCoy states in his history of our Order: "It is in this sense that Fr. Huntington became Father Founder: not that he had the founding vision, but that he had the founding strength to remain faithful, and his faithfulness raised up a mighty work.” (p.38)

His decision was undoubtedly fueled by his conviction that the virtues of monastic life- humility, obedience, love- could serve as an example for all Christian life. The distinction lies in that, in monastic life the individual relinquishes independence in order to become part of a unified body, guided by the Holy Spirit.

In his letter to the Galatians, Saint Paul gives us an account of some traits that characterize a Spirit-led community. It begins with the understanding that life according to the Spirit is not something that can simply be structured according to human expectations. It is a counter-cultural orientation of the heart especially in western culture, which places a great deal of emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency. Statements such as: “I can take care of myself” or “I can make it on my own” or “I don’t need anything or anybody” are often applauded, and heard with admiration.

By contrast, monastic life is characterized by the interdependence of its members. And that means that we support one another in times of need, but also that we are willing to confront one another when necessary. Our common welfare depends on the spiritual health of each member, and we all have a stake in helping one another walk faithfully in Jesus’ way. But it goes further. Saint Paul urges his readers to bear one another’s burdens. We are called to imitate the self-sacrificial pattern of Jesus’ life, who, “humbled himself and became obedient to the point of death- even death on a cross." (Philippians 2:8) This requires the complete surrender of our false self, our individualism, and selfish desires and consider first the interest of the community. 

For Father Huntington that was the call. That was the model for the monastic life, and for him, this vision extended to the entire human enterprise. A community that keeps its vision focused on Jesus and does not ignore the poor, the sick, and those in any need or trouble. A community that keeps its vision focused on Jesus and seeks the well-being of all. A community that keeps its vision focused on Jesus and sees the depth of God's forgiveness, grace, and love. A community that keeps its vision focused on Jesus as the ultimate example of a life of service and sacrifice. A community that keeps its vision focused on Jesus as the manifestation of what being created in the image of God really looks like. A community that keeps its vision focused on Jesus as the ultimate example of holiness. 

This was the vision of Father Huntington, who in his rule for our Order wrote: “Holiness is the brightness of divine love; love must act as light must shine and fire must burn.” It was this sense of love that carried him through all his struggles: his two companions in the early days of the Order leaving; a scathing reply from Bishop Potter of New York, who had encouraged him in the early stages of his vocation, refusing to attend the laying of the cornerstone for this monastery, writing, “Once you were the head of a Brotherhood engaged in the service of the poor. Now, I believe yours is a “contemplative” brotherhood, and you a roaming preacher. I must own that neither your aims nor life interest us.” And there were periods of what appeared to be something close to nervous breakdowns, and depression, and burnout, and temptations to escape, and incredible disappointment, especially about what he experienced to be the failure of the ideal of the monastic life as he had understood it. His life seems to have been one of constantly seeking to imitate Jesus’ self-outpouring, through his involvement in the economic and social issues of his day, as well as his evangelistic work. But it was also, clearly, a life of constant struggle. Yet, from all I’ve read, his faith never seemed to have waivered. There was constant surrender of self-will and despite the struggle, he stayed the course, and followed the path.

On the Vow of Obedience in his Rule for the Order, Father Huntington wrote: “The opportunity for this surrender is afforded in our community life. We are to die to our isolation and separateness as individuals, that we may live in the energies of a mystical body wherein the life is one, and that the life of Jesus, our Head. The community is thus our means of entrance into union with our ascended Lord.” Every time we enter this church to pray the office, we do so as one body. It is no longer about my voice, my prayer, my worship, but our voice, our prayer, our worship. We each bring our uniqueness, our fullest personality to form part of a bigger whole, a mystical body.

This is the surrender, the obedience of which he spoke; a surrender and obedience that can only be achieved by that love that “must act as light must shine, and fire must burn.” In the flush of love's light, he dared be brave, and suddenly he saw that love cost all he was and would ever be. Yet it was love, which set him free.
Blessed James Huntington, intercede for us. ¡Que así sea! ~Amen+

________________________

References:
·      Maya Angelou, Touched by an Angel (poem)
·      Adam Dumbar McCoy, Holy Cross: A Century of Anglican Monasticism (Morehouse-Barlow Publishing, 1987)
·      Richard Paul Vaggione, OHC, editor, The Rule of James Otis Sargent Huntington and his Successors (Order of the Holy Cross, 1996)
·      Father Alan Whittemore, OHC, O. H. C. (Unpublished)
·      Br. Adam McCoy, OHC, Sermon for the Solemnity of James Otis Sargent Huntington, OHC – Holy Cross Monastery, November 27, 2012
·      Br. Robert James Magliula, OHC, Sermon for the Solemnity of James Otis Sargent Huntington, OHC – Holy Cross Monastery, November 25, 2015

·      Br. Robert Sevensky, Sermon for the Solemnity of James Otis Sargent Huntington, OHC – Holy Cross Monastery, November 25, 2016

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Proper 28, Year A: November 19, 2017

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Randy Greve, OHC
Proper 28 - Sunday, November 19, 2017


To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.


Br. Randy Greve
It is his fault. He knew what the master expected. He knew that one day his master would return and demand an accounting. No hole could ever be deep enough to bury his dread. He thought he could get away with it, but the day of reckoning has come – and he is found out. The master has a business to run. He has no time for idle workers. No use for the unmotivated, for anyone who is not as excited about making money as the master. Off the team, out on the street, out of sight, invisible – loser, no good, worthless… worthless. Actually, the master has had a good day. Two out three is not so bad. And those two doubled their money – 100% profit! Mr. Worthless can be replaced soon enough. The master, he has people lining up to work for him. 

He has the best business model in town – a guaranteed formula for growth. He gets his employees so energized and motivated to win, win, and win. Mr. Worthless is not good for public relations – gives the company a bad image. If the master keeps him, people will talk. Besides, the risk is too big, that is why he only got one talent in the first place. He was afraid of this happening. Forget about him. He is outside. He does not exist. Mr. Worthless will have a long time to reflect on his failure. The master did what had to be done. 

The wicked and lazy will never learn – it's how they are. Better to be on the side of the hard-working, rule-following citizens. So look on the bright side – a net profit of six talents! Time to party! We have enough capital to expand the business now, branch out into more territory, and gobble up the weak and the small - become big. The master is on the inside for good. No sadness on the inside – no pain, just joy. Yes, joy all around, joy all the time. Joy, joy, joy. But remember – it is his joy – all from him and for him. Cross him and he is just as likely to throw you out, too. He has to be careful. The competition, the undesirables, the jealous and bitter like Mr. Worthless will come at him now. He needs better security, taller walls. Yes, build a wall!  Are his slaves, I mean employees, really loyal? What if there is a spy among his ranks? 

He will find them; throw them into the darkness alongside Mr. Worthless. The revenge is sweet. The look on their faces when they are grabbed by the throat when the door slams in front of them. They dare not anger the master. Can you believe that?  Calling the master crooked!  He deserves what he got. Let him rot out there in the darkness all alone, with nothing and no one. He brought it upon himself. 

Not everything that Jesus says in the gospels is Jesus speaking as himself. At times he will use the voice of a character, as I just did in speaking as a supporter of the master in the parable. Jesus is not above a bit of hyperbole, irony, or spoof to make a point. In his original Aramaic, this figure of speech is a comparison from lesser to greater. We hear this when Jesus says things like "if you who are evil know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give good things…"  Or the unjust judge who grants the widow's request because she keeps at him. The rhetorical sense is "if even those who are evil recognize faithfulness and reward achievement which is fading away, how much more will your heavenly Father, who loves you inside and out, give you the blessings of the kingdom which never fade away. If the wicked can throw a good party, imagine what the heavenly banquet will be like!

Sadly, most commentaries and interpreters assume that the master is Jesus and the slaves are disciples and the return is the second coming. I say "sadly" because Jesus as the master here is a serious problem. If Jesus is the master, we have to contend with him in his own voice calling the talent-burying slave "worthless". This kind of entitlement exegesis can reinforce a distorted image of God as one who rewards the successful and damns failure, which is not the gospel. 

The parable itself does not require the classic interpretation. On its face, the parable tells of a rich man who entrusts large sums of money to slaves and returns to get an accounting and who rewards or punishes based on performance. My minority reading interprets the parable as a spoof of empire. Empire in this context meaning whatever attitudes, customs, or structures of power designed to preserve the status quo of the powerful. Theologically, an empire is the opposite of the kingdom of which Jesus speaks. Spiritually, empire blinds, empire builds walls, rots the soul, hardens the heart.

Let's set the stage:  Jesus is in the temple area in Jerusalem. It is Wednesday of Holy Week. Matthew has had Jesus enter into these days with a polemic against the abusive and hypocritical religious system of many of the Pharisees and other leaders. Jesus' theme is that the judgment coming will not weigh you on your religious performance or your collusion with the occupying Romans for political status, but the judgment is about your compassion and mercy and the justice that defends and cares for the most vulnerable – precisely those kicked out of the community of the temple - in other words, the judgment is on the basis of what it means to be God's people in the first place. Jesus co-opts the rhetoric of empire, which in his immediate context is Rome and Rome's supporters, and paints the picture of a backward, mirror image nightmare kingdom in this parable. 

If the reward of empire is nothing more but the approval of a brutal and capricious master, maybe it is not as great as you thought. The Pharisees and the other leaders who have cozied up to Rome and thus have been neglecting the poor, harming their souls and betraying the command to love God, will find that the pot at the end of the rainbow is empty, they have been played, Rome will win as Rome always wins and turn on them just as quickly as it has on all those who have resisted it. When you stop producing for Rome, an end will surely come in the destruction of Jerusalem in just a few decades – wake up and get off the road to ruin. 

Jesus' intent is to take his hearers and us to the end of ourselves. In 12-step recovery, this is called "hitting bottom" when the addiction has become so destructive and its delusions so undeniable that the choice is often as stark as "will I live or die?" Jesus' mission is to make that question heard. Jesus is about the kingdom of heaven, the path of life, it is his constant theme. But in order for the kingdom of heaven to be something we can receive and desire, we have to be taken all the way to the bottom of the kingdom of empire. We have to gaze into the abyss of hopelessness in order to wake up to wanting to live. If we say "yes" to Jesus, we have to be just as emphatic about that to which we are now saying "no". His critique is "if you go all out for this life, sell your soul for money and pleasure and security what do you get in the end?"  What's the payoff?  Do you really want to be judged solely on your ability to produce?

Not until he rips the mask off the delusion of all that we think will make us happy, not until he takes us to the end of all of our programs for ultimate satisfaction on our own, can the kingdom of heaven be the answer to our hearts deepest desire and need. Although even as Christians we are people of empire more than we want to see, what we really want, deep down, is more than that. In the parable, the system is rigged to make the slaves prove their worthiness. The first two slaves do just that. They get status and power, they have their reward. Jesus, however, says your infinite worth has been a gift the whole time. 

The last slave, who at first reading seems to be the loser, is actually the hero. The worst thing you could do within a domination system is made yourself an enemy of the system. This fellow is not playing that game. He functions as Jesus himself – shining the light of truth on the tyrant's behavior, daring to say what he has done, tell him who he really is. All the talk of systems and power comes down to a person. The parable begs the question – is the one cast out into the darkness really worthless?  Do I let that label stand?

If he is a precious brother made in the image and likeness of God, then we are seeing with kingdom eyes, we are seeing a brother in whom Christ dwells. What the empire sees as the place of rejection and abandonment, as the last place God would care about, much less visit, Jesus transforms into the place where encounter and hope are born. Next Sunday, Christ the King Sunday, we will hear the charge to care for the needy. The focus will shift from what is to what could be. So the label cannot stand. We must recognize the worth of all, especially those on the outside.

The outcast becomes my ultimate concern. That he is outside is unacceptable. Empire always defines itself by who belongs outside. The master's joy is fleeting and illusory. The kingdom of heaven is made known by the lengths to which its subjects go to provide care and to invite, by who is welcomed in. The true party begins when we have the courage to stand up and say "no", when the lost sheep is found, when the wayward son returns, when the unclean are healed, when the hungry fed, when the sinful outcasts embraced, when the sick made whole, when the outer darkness is empty. Amen.

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

The Ordination of Br. Aidan Owen to the Order of Deacons : November 14, 2017

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
to the Sacred Order of Deacons
The Rev. Matthew Wright
November 14, 2017- Luke 12:35-38


To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.


The Rev. Matthew Wright
Whoo boy! This day has been a long time coming. Nearly ten years ago—it’s weird saying that out loud—I got an e-mail from a Yale undergrad asking about my year in the Episcopal Service Corps program I was then finishing. He had just been accepted into the same program, and had some questions… actually, a list of exactly 12 questions. He said that although he had always been academically-focused, he felt that God was pushing him out into the world to find other seekers… and he mentioned his calling to the priesthood.

Br. Aidan… then Will… accepted the intern position, and we actually ended up working together for about 6 months, before I went off to India, and then on to seminary. And over the next several years we would occasionally bump into each other or catch up by e-mail.

By 2011, Will was a seminarian at Union in New York, but he was no longer pursuing the priesthood. An e-mail note from that year stated how amazing James Cone was as a professor, and ended with “I’m not planning on entering the discernment process, though I guess that could always change.”

Way to leave room for the Holy Spirit! And the next I heard, discernment was on again—begun with St. Luke in the Fields. And then off again—or, at least, graciously paused by Bishop Andy—because monastic discernment had begun. At long last, monastic vows were entered, the Bishop pressed unpause, GOEs came and went, and ten years from the first e-mail, here we are today. Family, friends, brothers—people from so many different communities that have shaped Aidan and made him who he is this morning.

And because for all of these years the discernment question has centered on priesthood, it’s very easy to see today as just a bump in the road along the way to the goal. Ordination to the transitional diaconate! Often approached as, eh, just a necessary hoop to jump through.

Shortly after I was ordained to the priesthood, I was present at a program about diaconal ministry. And the vocational deacon leading the event asked for all the deacons in the room to stand up. Well, I, I was now a priest, so I kept my seat. And the deacon looked at me, and I said, “Oh no, I’m a priest now.”  And she said, “Oh no—once you are ordained a deacon, you are always a deacon.”  And I learned my lesson and got to my feet. You are not stripped of your ordination to the diaconate when you become a presbyter, regardless of what the word transitional may imply. The vows you will make today endure. And diaconal ministry will be enfolded into your priestly vocation and, thank God, it will never leave you.

Now admittedly, when Aidan invited me to preach, my mind went right to “What a good priest he’ll be.”  And I started thinking about the books on priesthood I was going to quote from. And I had to slow down and say, Wait, the work we’re gathered to do today, the work of the Holy Spirit we’re gathered to witness, is the ordination of a deacon. And it is not a bump in the road to the priesthood or a hoop to be jumped through. It is a sacred and sacramental and lifelong charge.

During the Examination, our good bishop will name the work of a deacon. He will tell us that Aidan is “to make Christ and his redemptive love known… to those among whom you live and work and worship”; that he is “to show Christ’s people that in serving the helpless they are serving Christ himself.”  And he will say—and this is where I want to dwell this morning—the bishop will say, “You are to interpret to the Church the needs, concerns, and hopes of the world.”

That’s big. You are to interpret to the Church, the world. Not interpret the Church to the world—that’s a very different thing—but interpret the world to the Church. You are to be a voice for the whole messy, broken, beautiful, becoming, hurting, longing world. You, Aidan, as a deacon, are to place your ear against the breast of the world and listen for the heartbeat of God, for the longings of God, and then come back and say “Church, Church, let me tell you what God is doing in the world, what God needs in the world, what the Spirit is up to outside our walls, let me interpret the world to you.”

Because too often we, the Church, get too worried about our buildings and our budgets and our theological minutiae—as important as those things all can be. And too often we have thought our job is simply to interpret the Church to the world. And we need diaconal witnesses who can remind us that Christ came not to be served but to serve, not simply to be heard but to listen, to listen with our ear against the breast of the world, which is the breast of Christ himself.

I’ve heard Bishop Dietsche say that of our three Holy Orders, the closest to the actual servant ministry of Jesus is the Sacred Order of Deacons. Jesus may be our Great High Priest after the Order of Melchizedek, but he did not busy himself offering sacrifices for the institutional Temple complex. No, he was out with his ear against the breast of the world.

Now the question may come to your mind, How is a deacon to keep his ear to the heart of the world tucked away in a monastery? Well, first of all, this monastery is no escape from the world; life lived in intimate community is life lived in the heart of the world. And the world courses through this place as every year thousands upon thousands of hungry souls, of spiritual seekers, pour through these doors, these halls, this chapel. People who would not step foot into a parish church come here to find God, people from so many walks of life come here to find quiet and healing, come here to speak their needs, concerns, and hopes. That diaconal longing expressed in an e-mail 10 years ago to be in the world with other seekers is still being lived out right here and now.

And so Aidan, this is the perfect place to live the diaconal dimension of your vocation—which is not simply to help set the Table or liturgically proclaim the Gospel—which we already know all of the brothers here get to do anyway; no it’s to take the pulse of the world as it flows through this place, and then to interpret, to speak a word from that encounter, to the Church. I have heard your voice, and I know that the Church needs it.

But it would be woefully short-sighted to think that the world Aidan is charged with interpreting is simply made up of human beings. As a deacon, you need to listen to the honey bees in that field, and to this sacred Hudson River, and to that 300-year-old oak tree in the cloister, and to the birds and the deer on this land, and interpret their needs and their hopes to the Church as well. You are to interpret to the Church the world, the whole world because the Church has been far too near-sighted far too often.

And so this deaconing work, it is first and foremost contemplative work. To interpret, and interpret well, you must listen, you must be present, you must be free of agenda. Because if you are not, you end up only interpreting yourself, your ego, and not the world. Aidan will be, and is, an excellent interpreter. More than once you have interpreted to me what God is speaking in and through the world.

In our Gospel reading, Jesus says, "…be like those who are waiting for their master to return from the wedding banquet, so that they may open the door for him as soon as he comes and knocks."  A deacon has discovered that the Master is knocking in every moment, in every inch of creation, that the world itself is the wedding banquet. “Blessed are those slaves whom the master finds alert…” Present. Lovingly attentive. Ever-ready to interpret. Deaconing.

I used to be on the bandwagon that says, “The transitional diaconate is a confusion of orders. If someone feels called to the priesthood, they feel called to the priesthood, and not the diaconate.”  I still think that’s probably true. And all the more reason that priests should be ordained first as deacons!

Each of our holy orders is like a sacramental mirror, reflecting back to all of us a fundamental facet of our own humanity—in the setting of the table, reflecting back the universal call to servanthood; in the breaking of the bread, reflecting back the priesthood of all believers; in the office of the bishop, reflecting back the unity of the people of God.

Shortly, Aidan, the Church will lift you up as such a mirror, and then set you down among the people to show them who they really are. Wearing a habit, he already knows something about this mirror work. Remember that like your monastic vocation—and like all Christian living—diaconal work is first of all contemplative work—that to interpret God’s world, you must be empty, and humble, and fully human. Because it is only out of the awareness of our transforming union with God in the humanity of Christ that everything else flows. Daily you will have to polish the rust from the surface of the sacramental mirror of your life. And I’m sure your brothers will gladly help with the necessary abrasion.

And when in six months or so you, God willing, are made a priest, don’t forget this, your first ordination, not replaced by but enfolded into the next. As a priest, you will be called to interpret the Church to the world, but never forget to interpret the world to the Church. And so, my dear brother Aidan, rest your ear against the breast of creation, which is the breast of Christ himself, and listen for the heartbeat of God… and then come back and say Church, Church, let me tell you, let me tell you…!

And so we pray, Come Holy Spirit, come Holy Spirit, come Holy Spirit… Amen.