Showing posts with label Proper 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proper 5. Show all posts

Sunday, June 6, 2021

Proper 5 B - June 6, 2021

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Robert James Magliula, OHC

Proper 5 B - Sunday, June 6, 2021



Eden is the backdrop for this mythical account of human origins. Having encountered the crafty serpent, the man and woman now encounter, as if for the first time together, their Maker, walking in the garden in the cool of evening. Our reading begins, after the serpent has already deceived Adam and Eve into disobeying God’s command.

As a result, they do what many of us mortals would do: they hide. In fact, they hide so well that God does not seem to be able to find them. God calls out to them, “Where are you?” The man gives up their hiding place by responding to the question. He reveals his knowledge of their nakedness and the scene shifts from hide and seek to the blame game. He blames the whole thing on the woman, deflecting the attention to her. The woman gives an honest answer to God. “The serpent tricked me.” 

In his commentary on the Book of Genesis, Walter Brueggemann suggests that the serpent is the world’s first theologian because it is the serpent who convinces humankind to exchange obedience to God for theology about God.  If we think about God narrowly enough, we can distract ourselves into believing that we can think our way to salvation. Our knowledge becomes a means of self-preservation and protection, rather than a means of communicating trust in the living God. Theological talk is a dangerous enterprise when it seeks to analyze and objectify matters of faithfulness. Our anxiety arises from doubting God’s providence, rejecting God’s care, and seeking to secure our own well-being. The serpent succeeds in seducing humankind into believing there are securities apart from God. This still lies at the heart of our living in fear of God rather than in obedient trust.  We think of sin as breaking a rule, but at heart it is a betrayal of trust and love, and it gets expressed in our shame at our very creatureliness.
 
To be like God, knowing good from evil would seem on the face of it to be a good thing. According to OT scholar, Samuel Terrien, the narrator’s intention in telling this story is simply to show “our lust for self-deification.”
No creature is guileless. Deception and self-deception appear even in paradise. 

“Where are you?” is the first question that God asks in Scripture and, it is asked not just of the characters in this story, but of every one of us. “Where are you?” At once, the question assumes an answer—we are not where we should be—and poses yet another question—where should we be? We sense that there is an estrangement from our essential created selves that’s rooted in our alienation from God and gets expressed in behaviors that alienate us from one another. It’s not that the image of God in which we were created has been erased from our DNA, but that deep within ourselves we are not fully what we are meant to be, and we know it. Yet God cuts through our thick underbrush of words and ideas, calling out to us, “Where are you?”

These last decades have been marked by the exponential growth and sophistication of technology. The world is more connected than ever, but it may also be more distracted than ever. Technology can distract us from everything from our ability to have meaningful face-to-face conversations, to keeping our eyes on the road and off our screens as we drive. So, it is with our lives of faith. When moments of tension invariably arise in community, we get distracted by arguments, anxieties and self-interests, and so we cut ourselves off from community and, in turn, short-circuit the possibility of reconciliation.
To consider this question of where we are, we must discern where God is inviting us. One place to start is to take account of all that distracts us from living lives of faithfulness. Distractions look different for different folks, but their central characteristic is the same: they draw our attention away from focusing on the life-giving parts of our lives. We can become distracted in our relationships, our work, our desire for meaning, acceptance, intimacy. Even our sabbaths can become muddled with distractions about what we might be missing. Distractions draw us away from the places in our lives that afford us peace, joy, and love. Ultimately, they distract us from our life with God. The Good News is that ours is a God who, no matter where we hide, seeks us, calls us, and invites us back. 

Today’s Gospel points to how family itself can be a distraction. No matter what type of family we come from, we had or still have a role to play within it. Jesus returns to his hometown to mixed reviews. He is confronted by those who are committed to maintaining domestic and religious life in the midst of troubled times. The only ones who seemed to provoke Jesus to intolerance are his family and the law-abiding scribes. For them, Jesus’ disordered love of humanity feels like falling into chaos, best symbolized by the demonic or insanity. People fear what they do not understand. Since people generally fear change in their own lives, the chances that they would support change in others is slim. We may think we know what is best for the other person but usually, it is what is best for us.

Jesus’ family attempts to get him under control, if not out of fear for his safety, at least to remove their own embarrassment because of his rising notoriety. This was not the only time that Jesus wrestled with his family or the religious authorities. In this passage Jesus is reminding them and us that those who take care of us, love us, nurture us, can also distract and bind us. They do this not because they are evil, but because they were captive themselves and had come to accept that this is how to find and maintain life. 

Jesus challenged his Jewish culture when he declared, “Whoever does the will of God is my brother and sister and mother” (Mark 3:35). Insiders and outsiders are now defined, not by blood, but by commitment to doing God’s will. If we are to experience the gracious love of God, Jesus challenges us to expand our family by looking beyond our walls, our race, culture, denominations, socio-economic status in order to see our brothers and sisters and mothers. Doing the will of God often means leaving our comfort zones. We cannot do this alone. Jesus’ single-minded focus on God’s will is our model. It takes a strong person to become who God created them to be and to continue to make positive changes even when it puts personal relationships in jeopardy.

In the Epistle, Paul reminding us that everything human will perish, steers us to a hope that sees God’s presence, with the eyes of our heart, outside and inside us.  “Even though our outer nature is wasting away, our inner nature is being renewed day by day.” (2 Cor. 4:6). We take comfort that the resurrected Christ lives in us creating a new solidarity with all of humanity, in its moral, physical, spiritual beauty and imperfection, allowing us to give up our self-absorption, and to live into the densities of human joy and suffering. Jesus comes to set us free from both our inner and outer captivities, so we can discover the freedom of the children of God.  

May we listen intently enough to hear God’s voice and discern deeply enough to answer God’s call.  

Amen.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Proper 5 - Year B: June 8, 2018

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br.  Aidan Owen, OHC
Proper 5 - Sunday, June 8, 2018

To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.

Br. Aidan Owen
You’ll have to pardon me, but having been ordained a priest less than a week ago, I have vows on the mind. And while I don’t find it the most comforting image in scripture to describe the vowed life, today’s gospel text certainly provides us with an apt one.

“No one can plunder the strong man’s house without first binding up the strong man. Then you can plunder his house.”

It’s hard not to chafe at the idea of being bound and plundered. Boundaries, rules, and commitments limit our freedom of expression and action. Beginning with the vows we made or that were made on our behalf at baptism, we Christians agree to live in alignment with the will and desire of God made known to us scripture, the traditions of our ancestors, the revelations of our communities, and the whispering of the Spirit in our hearts. We are not free to do solely as we wish, at least not if we desire to live our lives with integrity and purpose.

And yet, binding is not primarily a term of limitation. We speak also of the bonds of fellowship and love, of the ties that unite us and draw us closer to the ones we love. One binds wounds so that torn flesh can knit itself back together.

Isaiah gives us perhaps the most beautiful image of binding, an image that Jesus picks up at his first public teaching: The Lord has anointed me to bring good news to the poor, to bind up the broken hearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners.

In his rule for the community, our Founder describes purity of heart as the goal of every Christian life. Now purity, in this context, could better be translated as “unity” of heart. The goal of the Christian life is unity of heart, which is to say, the directing of our entire being toward God: body, mind, spirit, heart—all that we are centered in love on the one who gives us life.

Most of the time, most of us are like that house divided against itself. We do, truly, wish to love God with our whole selves. And sometimes we are like the eager disciple of Benedict’s Rule, who, in a fit of love, is eager to take the narrow road of which the Lord says: Narrow is the road that leads to life. In our ardor and eagerness we make promises and commitments, we agree “no longer [to] live by [our] own judgment, giving in to [our] whims and appetites; rather [we] walk according to another’s decisions and directions.” That part of us is real and good.

And yet, the eager disciple is not alone in our house. All too soon the strong man of our own willfulness, our stubborn desire to have things our way, our self-righteous anger at others’ perceived shortcomings or our own, and our certainty about what is good and what is not, returns to dominate us and divide us from our heart’s deepest desire, which is for union with God.

Not only do these dynamics rage within us individually, but they also do so corporately.

How often have we allowed our fear of the losses of aging and financial insufficiency to lead us to the safe choice rather than the prophetic one? How often have we really turned down the volume of our certainty that we have the right answer or the right way forward to listen to the deeper stirrings of the Spirit within our own or another’s heart? Is our first question always “what new work is God calling forth from us today?” Or is it often, “what do I want and how can I get it?”

We need the commitments we have made in the flush of our eager love to hold us when the strong men of self-will, doubt, arrogance, and fear begin to dominate us. The vows we have made bind up these strong men so that they can be healed and transformed, so that their strength and energy can be directed to the building up of the body in love. And here is a paradox for us: true freedom is the freedom to surrender our entire being to the transforming movement of God’s love in and among us, and in so doing, to become conduits of that transforming love to a hurting and fractured world. When we allow ourselves to be bound up and healed, we can become the wounded healers that the world so desperately needs.

As we all know, this process is not an easy one. “Purity of heart,” the Founder writes, “is never attained without pain and suffering. [However,] such pain and suffering can be an agent of cleansing, detachment, simplification, and a humility that leads to greater and greater dependence upon God.”

He continues, “As a community dedicated to the Holy Cross, we cannot escape witnessing to this truth, namely, that it is only in and through self-sacrifice that we come to share in Christ’s victory. The image of the contemplative cleaving [we might say “bound]” in loving adoration to God amid chaos, temptation, spiritual dryness, and apparent uselessness can serve as an archetype of our lives as Christians and monastics. The key to this whole process lies in the complete surrender of our will to God as revealed in our crucified Lord. It is the essence of our vow of obedience.”

We cannot bind ourselves or the strong men that dominate and divide our house. We cannot unite ourselves individually or collectively. But we can surrender to the work of God within and among us. We can recommit ourselves to the vows we have made and to the common life in which we have made them. We can hold out our wounded, fractured hearts to the Crucified and Risen One, who binds up those hearts and make them whole. He will heal us, will bind us in and to his love. He will set us free.

Sunday, June 7, 2015

Proper 5 B - Jun 7, 2015

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Roy Parker, OHC
Proper 5 B – Sunday, June 7, 2015

Genesis 3: 8 - 15
2 Corinthians 4:13 - 5:1
Mark 3: 20 - 35
This is a story about Markʼs Deli in Caeserea, a favorite rest stop for Jesus and the Twelve whenever they were on the road. This explains why Markʼs Gospel is known for something called “The Markan Sandwich,” in this case not a killer lunch item as it was, but a literary device to illuminate particular episodes of the Gospel. Here are some examples:

TWO SANDWICH DIAGRAMS

(Concluding with Todayʼs Gospel) Mark uses the Sandwich device so that the bread and the
filling become commentaries on each other . . .

(1)Jairusʼ Daughter & the Hʼd Woman: Jairusʼ twelve-yearold daughter is at deathʼs door. As Jesus is on the way to heal her, a woman whoʼs been afflicted with hʼing for twelve years, and therefore unclean, also unsusceptible to ordinary medicine, sneaks up to touch him and is healed. She has to confess her taboo action and is assured that her faith has saved her whom Jesus addresses as a beloved daughter of God. Itʼs a kind of deliverance from death. Thereupon another daughter of God, of a similarly hopeless situation, linked to the hʼing woman by the figure twelve, is also delivered from death by the faith of her parents united to Jesus.

(2)The Special of the Day:
The Bread: Family Intention to Restrain Jesus on the basis of Nutsy Behavior Attributed to Unclean Spirit Possession. The Filling: The Binding of Satan by the Stronger One: The Centerpiece is Jesusʻ arrival as the one capable of binding and despoiling Satan, which Mark underscores five times by using the verb from which we get dynamite, dynamo, dynamic and so forth, the evangelistic equivalent of kryptonite.

Itʼs the key point which ignites the opposition of the scribes and that of his family, including Mary, which raises the intriguing question of how could she, of all people, regard her son as nuts and possessed of a dirty spirit if heʼd been miraculously conceived? The key point is that a stronger than Satan has arrived to tie him up and repossess the stolen goods.

This overpowering of Satan has been described in terms of the Crucifixion as the offering of a kind of bait which the devil swallows to his undoing, giving rise to the expression: The Place of the Skull has become the Gate of Paradise. Archbishop William Temple, one of our spiritual forebears, riffs on this to describe how Jesus becomes the stronger one who binds the devil in captivity to love for ever. His words are from the article Mens Creatrix: “It is out of the uttermost gloom of ʻMy God, my God, why have you forsaken meʼ that the light breaks. The light does not merely shine upon the gloom and so dispel it; it is the gloom itself transformed into light. 

For that same crucifixion of the Lord which was, and for ever is, the utmost effort of evil, is itself the means by which God conquers evil and unites us to (Godself) in the redeeming love there manifested. Judas and Caiphas and Pilate have set themselves in their several ways to oppose and to crush the purpose of Christ, and yet despite themselves they become ministers. They sent Christ to the cross; by the cross he completed his atoning work; from the cross he reigns over (humankind). God in Christ has not merely defeated evil, but has made it the occasion of (divine) supreme glory.

Never was conquest so complete; never was triumph so stupendous. The completeness of the victory is due to the completeness of the evil over which it was won. It is the very darkness which enshrouds the cross that makes so glorious the light proceeding from it. Had there been no despair, no sense of desolation and defeat, but merely the onward march of irresistible power to the achievement of its end, evil might have been beaten, but not bound in captivity to love for ever. God in Christ endured defeat, and out of the very stuff of defeat . . . wrought (the divine) victory and achievement.”

Evil bound in captivity to love forever. Therefore the binding of Satan in todayʼs passage must be related, but how on earth and in what outlandish behavior could Jesus have engaged which would cause his family and the scribes to certify him crazy and to sin against the Holy Spirit by declaring him motivated by a dirty spirit?

For one thing, the apparent craziness isnʼt hard to imagine in consideration of the prophetic tradition of Israel from which Jesus comes. One only need recall Samuelʼs advice to the newly-anointed King Saul that he, Saul, was about to meet a band of prophets who would be in a prophetic frenzy accompanied by musical instruments. At that point the spirit of the Lord would possess him and he would be in a prophetic frenzy along with them and be turned into a different person. Sounds pretty certifiable to me.

It also sounds as if Jesus in a kind of prophetic frenzy will be operating with an undomesticated, apparently soiled spirit, which is what scares us, as it scared one of Alan Whittemoreʼs directees back in 1929 with this advice: “The glory of the mystery of Free Will is that one may reveal and express the Will of God, very often, through following oneʼs own deepest desires. We ought to remember this fact and rejoice in it much oftener than we do. Instead of spending all our lives in terrified inhibitions and scrupulosity, we should be learning . . . to live forthrightly and boldly; and not to be afraid to follow the desires of our heart, for (Godʼs) sake. . // . 

I feel confident that, were it unmistakably revealed to you that God wished you to take this or that course, you would want to do it with all your heart. (In the absence of any such clear revelation) will you not be bold enough to believe that God the Holy Spirit who indwells you will guide you in and through your desires? It takes great courage, sometimes, to quietly ask ourselves what, really and truly, in our heart of hearts, without any consideration as to right or wrong, or expediency, we would most like to do, and then do it wholeheartedly to the glory of God.” (Joy in Holiness, pp.27-28)

For us particularly concerned with monastic rules, their caution about spontaneity and their warnings against the soiled spirit, the conclusion of Ronald Hansonʼs book Mariette In Ecstacy is noteworthy. Those whoʼve read this delightful work will recall that Mariette, while a religious novice, receives the stigmata. This proves such a disturbing factor in the convent that sheʼs eventually asked to leave the community. Living in a town nearby she remains in correspondence with one of her dear friends in the novitiate to whom she writes on one occasion that sheʼs managing her new situation satisfactorily and, continuing her habit of prayer, is occasionally consoled by Jesus whispering to her, “Surprise me!”