Showing posts with label Proper 20. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proper 20. Show all posts

Sunday, September 22, 2024

The Eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost B - September 22, 2024

 Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Francis Beckham
The Eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost, Proper 20, September 22, 2024
 

 Click here for an audio of the sermon

May the words of my mouth and the meditations of my heart be pleasing to you, O God, my sustainer and my comforter. Amen.

Late in the summer of 2021, as I was preparing to leave Pittsburgh to enter the Order of the Holy Cross, an unexpected series of events began to happen. Seemingly at every turn during those final weeks in the Steel City, I was confronted with reminders of experiences I’d had during the six-year stint I was wrapping up there – not only reminders of actual events and interactions that had taken place, but also of feelings, emotions, and even ideas I’d had there.

 I suppose it’s not strange to reflect on a chapter of one’s life as it’s in the process of closing, but this seemed a little different. It was almost as if my residency in Pittsburgh had had a life of its own this whole time, and now it was going for one final hang-out session with me, wanting to reminisce about all the good – and ‘other’ – times we’d shared. I had the distinct feeling of being “seen off” by an unseen companion.

Now, what was especially interesting about this little walk down (or, ‘dahn’, as they say in Pittsburgh) Memory Lane, was that most of the memories were drawn from the hundreds of actual walks I’d taken through the surrounding neighborhoods during those years. There was, for example, the time I’d been strolling along Liberty Avenue in Bloomfield and, for some reason, happened to glance up into a brightly lit window of a big new apartment building. It was evening and, through this particular window, I could see maybe five or six young professional types, holding wine glasses and laughing. They were engrossed in their own merry little world, the kind that probably involved group artisanal cider tastings and weeknight visits to the rock-climbing gym. Meanwhile, I was standing out on the street, caught up in my own little world, one in which I could only wonder at what it would feel like even to know four other people to invite over for drinks and dinner.

I was projecting, of course. I didn’t actually know anything about the people in the window, and I had no idea what their lives were like. Maybe they couldn’t stand the taste of cider. Maybe some of them couldn’t stand each other. It’s possible they preferred jogging along the Allegheny River trails or down in Panther Hollow over working out in a gym. I wasn’t resentful or jealous of them. I was just aware of how seemingly different our lives were. But something in that scene stirred up a complicated concoction of emotions, regrets, doubts, and weird memories deep within me. I didn’t understand why, and I didn’t take the time right then and there to try to figure it out. I just turned and kept walking toward the old, beige brick building where my quiet, sensibly priced apartment sat waiting for me.

This experience, along with so many like it during that ‘winding-down’ time, gradually made me aware of something: Now in my early 40s, I hadn’t achieved most of the culturally prescribed standards of materialism and success – an overpriced residence at a trendy address; dental veneers; a partner and kids of my own who were perfectly quaffed and Instagram-ready at all times – and I was never going to. The reason? Despite how much I knew I was supposed to want all those things, I simply didn’t want them. And, apparently I never really had, or, at least, I hadn’t wanted them badly enough. I lacked sufficient ambition for them.

“Good,” I thought to myself while reflecting on these memories later. “Choosing not to pour my energy into getting things I don’t want is a sign of moral strength. Stoicism, even. I’m glad I was content not to be like those people in the window.” If this sounds like sour grapes, I assure you it’s actually much worse. It’s competition by comparison. In my head, I was competing with people who had never wronged me in any way just to assuage doubts I had about my own life choices. In this limited mindset, shaped by the world’s ‘wisdom’ rather than God’s, either they or I could be right, but we couldn’t all be.

Eventually I would come to understand that my judgmental attitude in this and other situations flows from the insecurities and hurts that reside in the shadowy corners of my ego’s cellar. The real damage isn’t so much that I had compared myself to others, but that I had assigned worth to them as human beings based solely on how their external circumstances – either real or perceived through clouded lenses – stacked up against mine. This is a long way from practicing the virtues of humbleness, service, and welcome we hear about in today’s readings.

In the Letter of James, we’re encouraged to live fully out of our authenticity, performing good works with “gentleness born of wisdom.” The worldly values of ambition and competitiveness, the writer of James warns us, will only ever serve us “disorder and wickedness.” I’m sure we can all think of times when we’ve recognized this tendency, along with its effects, in ourselves and others.

Living in a way that is “first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without a trace of partiality or hypocrisy” may seem like a mighty tall order, but the author of  James offers us an important insight that can help. Indeed, it’s absolutely critical: We must first get to know ourselves, and know ourselves well. “Those conflicts and disputes among you,” James asks, “where do they come from? Do they not come from your cravings that are at war within you?” Yes, James, they do.

They are the things that stir within us when we’re peering through apartment windows, observing the lives of others. And even though we can usually ‘walk them off’ pretty easily in the moment, they don’t leave; they only sink back beneath the surface again. If we want to keep them from returning, or at least stop them from driving our life choices, we have to identify them, name them, and address them. This is not easy work, but it is necessary if we want to live the kinds of lives of service and peacemaking described in James, or to use our gifts in being a generous and uplifting presence to others like the Wisdom Wife in our reading from Proverbs.

But here’s the thing. There’s more to all this than simply wanting to be nice people who go around doing nice things (and maybe being noticed for them, just a tiny bit). Our motive, first and foremost, must be a genuine desire to share in the Love that is born of God. Otherwise, we’re still being driven by ambition to compete against others to see who’s the best at being nice. Jesus recognizes this in his own disciples in our reading from Mark this morning, so none of us should think we’re immune from falling into this trap ourselves.

As they walk along the road to Capernaum, Jesus is aware they are competing with one another for status, even though he’s just finished teaching them about the need for total self-emptying, even if it ends up getting you killed. Like most of us when we know we’re resisting grace, they feel a sense of shame. They have nothing to say for themselves when Jesus asks what they were arguing about. It must be frustrating for him, but he bears their stubbornness with patience because he understands human nature from his own, personal experience. Plus, this is exactly why he’s with them, to show them how to love, no matter what it takes. So, he sits down, calls them to himself, and helps them understand that they must focus on being welcoming to each other – as welcoming as one would be to a child, in fact.

But why welcoming? Consider for a moment what happens when we commit ourselves to making someone feel truly welcome. We want them to be at ease, to feel accepted, safe, and cared-for. So, at least in that moment, we place them ahead of us. We’re not thinking about ourselves, we’re wholly concerned with their needs. And this, in turn, leads to gratitude on the other person’s part, creating a channel for love to flow between us. To put it simply, we can’t compete when we’re creating welcome, because (whether we’re consciously aware of it or not) it’s the presence of God within of us recognizing the exact same presence of God present within the other. We don’t even want to compete. We simply love.

As has been the case for so many people over the past one-hundred twenty-two years, it was a desire for this welcoming love that brought me to the monastery. Indeed, this fundamental need for belonging, free from having to compete to be valued, has drawn untold millions to religious communities for thousands of years. The founder of Western Christian monasticism and author of our own Rule of Life, Saint Benedict of Nursia, makes it clear that “All guests who present themselves are to be welcomed as Christ.” He continues, saying, “Once a guest has been announced, the superior and the [monks or nuns] are to meet [them] with all the courtesy of love.” (RB 53).

Beyond this, we as monastics are called to model the radical Way of Love and welcome that Jesus extended to all who desired and needed it, not only in welcoming guests, but in the very living of our lives together, in community, day in and day out, for the rest of our lives. Again, Saint Benedict tells us, “This, then, is the good zeal which monks [and nuns] must foster with fervent love: They should each try to be the first to show respect to the other, supporting with the greatest patience one another’s weaknesses of body or behavior … Let them prefer nothing whatever to Christ, and may he bring us all together to everlasting life” (RB 72).

The ability to live out this vision of radical hospitality, acceptance, and valuing of human dignity is available to everyone. Monks and nuns may have a particular responsibility to model it, but literally anyone can – and, I dare say, should – do it. We can all welcome others as we would welcome Jesus in the person of a small child (or of a coworker, spouse, bus driver, homeless person, cashier, barista, addict, you name it), and in doing so help to reverse the human value systems around us that are built on competition and comparison. After all, it is the love of the same God which dwells within each and every person.

May peace and all that is good be with us, and all whom we love, today and always. Amen.

 


Sunday, September 24, 2023

Proper 20 A - September 24, 2023

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Bernard Delcourt OHC
The Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost, Proper 20 A, September 24, 2023
 
Exodus 16:2-15
Philippians 1:21-30
Matthew 20:1-16

 

“Give us this day our daily bread.”

With this verse, each time we pray the Lord’s prayer we ask God to act as the affirmative action employer we have in today’s parable. We ask God to give us enough just to live today. We commit to depend on the mercy and grace of God.

In the Exodus story, God teaches God’s chosen people to learn to rely on him one day at a time. OK; two days at a time on the morning before the Sabbath. But that is two days at most. The manna even wastes away when you hold it longer.

God’s beloved people are trained by God not to hoard resources. They are to trust in God’s faithfulness to God’s children.

Jesus tells us that today’s parable resembles the kingdom of heaven. The landowner in this parable is adamant to find the very last person available to work in his vineyard. The harvest is plentiful and he needs all the laborers he can find, even at a late hour in the day.

The landowner considers that everyone deserves a living wage, even those who are late to the game. The wage agreed for with the first laborers he hires is a denarius.

It is nigh impossible to know exactly how much of an equivalent USD amount a denarius would be. But the consensus is that it was enough to live by for a day. Contemporary equivalent might be between 80 and 100 USD a day; nothing to get rich by, but enough to feed modestly a small family.

The second, third and fourth hires of the day (the 9 o’clock, noon and 3pm folks) are promised a pay of “whatever is right.” To most people of back then or of today, they would have expected a pay proportional to the part of the day that they actually worked (not the full day’s pay).

The five p.m. laborers are not even promised a pay at all but must have hoped for some remuneration. They probably didn’t expect much.

But when pay time comes around, everybody receives the same daily wage, a denarius, regardless of the amount of time they have actually toiled under the sun in the vineyard.

This is a landowner who affirms the right of all his workers to a living wage. It is in contradiction with society’s expectation of equal pay for equal work.

But what if you can’t find work till the eleventh hour of the day? The landowner does not put his workers in competition for a living wage. He makes no difference according to performance. This goes beyond justice for those who can get it. Instead, it demonstrates solidarity for all.

There are no winners and no losers in this vineyard. Although, those who worked hard the whole day would argue otherwise. Don’t they deserve more than the others?

But Jesus seems to say that in the kingdom of heaven, access to resources is not a question of merit but a question of need.

So, how do we let God’s kingdom of heaven break into our world? Where can we start to demonstrate solidarity for all, regardless of economic (or other) performance?

Primitive christian communities operated that way. Acts 2: 44-45 tells us “All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need.” How can we live together ever closer to that ideal?

Monastic communities approximate this way of sharing resources. Individual monks are precluded from holding anything more in individual use than what is needed for their daily living. Even so, it is understood that the clothes I wear belong to my community. We often joke to another brother showing up with a new shirt: “that’s a nice shirt we have there, Brother!”

However, everything I need is provided for by my community: room and board, healthcare, transportation, leisure, eldercare. I need not hoard anything for my future needs.

But also, the institution of the monastery owns a great deal of things necessary for the community to function today and we even hold reserves for future healthcare and eldercare.

One could argue that those communal belongings are held by the grace of God. What we don’t provide much for as a community is the superfluous. And God forbid that we should indulge in the extravagant. Our vow of conversion to the monastic way of life encompasses the directive of living simply.

Legend has it (or is it historical) that our founder, James Otis Sargent Huntington, would gather whatever money we had from our communal bank account at the end of the month and go give it away to the poor.

We nowadays have a different understanding of prudential care of our community. We show care and forethought to the men who are in the community today and those, who by the grace of God, will join us in the future.

So, how can we encourage and enable initiatives that support the provision of enough for every one in our family, country, on our planet?

Some politicians have suggested enacting laws towards the provision of Universal Basic Income. It is also known as guaranteed income. The payments are unconditional and do not require a means test or work requirement. The payments are made independently of any other income. It is a concept well worth investigating.

But even less ambitious endeavors could bring us closer to the proper care for all regardless of competitive merit.

What about the massive increase of public transportation? What about affordable housing for all? What about affordable childcare and healthcare for all?

Next time, you are enjoying the right to vote, consider how your democratic entitlement supports the provision of enough to live well to everyone.

So today’s parable opens us up to what living in the kingdom of heaven might be like here today.

We might be called late into God’s vineyard, but we are all called to contribute in whatever ways we can.

We will all be provided for by God’s grace. We Christians are called to embody that grace and provide for those who lack resources.

We can advocate for ways our families, communities and our society at large provide enough out of pure solidarity.

We are not to compete for more than what is enough. We are called to enjoy God’s grace in our everyday life.

We don’t deserve God’s grace according to our own merits. We deserve God’s grace because God is infinitely merciful and loving.

All we enjoy is by God’s grace. All we can be thankful for is ours to enjoy because we are God’s beloved, each and every one of us.

Thank you, Beloved God, for your abiding love. Amen.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Proper 20 B - September 19, 2021

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Randy Greve, OHC

Proper 20 B - Sunday, September 19, 2021



“Whoever wants to be first must be last of all and servant of all.”  Before the physical cross is laid on Jesus, the way of the cross is present in the Gospel of Mark. It is this Gospel’s central theme and image of speaking about discipleship.  This way is nothing less than the remaking of the world by self-offering love and thereby the abolishing of the world’s idols of power and domination.  With the coming of Jesus, no more will fear and violence claim power, but now welcome, sharing, a new community of brothers and sisters will subvert empires and plant hope that no politics can stop, no evil defy.  

The powers fight back with crosses and swords, and inflict the pain of their hatred of life.  In Jesus the cross and sword and the terror that come with them is unmasked, exposed to the light of truth.  Jesus has a word for the cycle of fear and revenge - hell.  Only something - someone - more powerful can break the cycle.  The way of the cross is the end of this cycle, the end of hell itself, in the power of a promise.  The promise is Christ in us and in one another which is a foretaste here and now, today, of the new heaven and new earth that are on the way.

The stories which show the disciples not understanding, not having faith, which in Mark are numerous, are not there so that we will look down on them from our perch of superiority.  Their hardness and dullness is a cautionary tale to us that we are always susceptible to the temptations of the way of rivalry rather than the way of humility.  Without steady vigilance, we will slide into the easy, broad road of judgment and prejudice.  Being last of all and servant of all will require intentionality and discipline.  

The words of Jesus become so familiar that we have to imagine the initial shock and crisis of such a saying as this - choosing to be last of all and servant of all.  He himself will be the model and supreme sign of this self-giving in his death and resurrection.  What the disciples would have heard as Jesus’ failure and defeat in crucifixion, is, within the new life of the way of the cross, the triumph of love and the abolishing of the powers of death and hell.  If Jesus can begin to open the minds and hearts of the disciples to a new way of seeing the world, of Jesus doing something grander and more monumental than they could dare think or imagine, they will begin to see the cross as the saving of the world that it is.  

The disciples are beginning to understand that their rivalry with one another is not how Jesus invites them to be, yet they are still attached to status and the avoidance of suffering.  Jesus’ response to their arguing with one another about who is the greatest is extraordinarily beautiful and insightful.  Notice that Jesus does not rebuke the impulse to greatness, he rejects their divisive application of the impulse.  He replaces a greatness that seeks power over others, at their expense, that believes we can only gain status if others lose it, with something even greater.  “Whoever wants to be first must be last of all and servant of all.”  He is not saying that wanting to be first is the problem. He is saying that using that desire to gain power for myself while taking it from you is the problem because it is not true or real.  

The goal to which we aspire is not domination of status over my brother or sister, but to imitate Jesus in the way of the cross in self-offering love.  He is saying, “Yes, compete with each other! Seek to outdo one another! Strive for the place of greatness - the last place!”  This is not as the world competes, not as another status game or as a way to show off and become thought of as special and elevated, but in order to build up the whole community, even at the expense of acclaim and praise focused on me.  The way of the cross means rising to the lowest place and thus lifting up all of us together.
 
What might the practical implications of this imperative from the Lord look like?  Choosing to be last of all and servant of all is an ethic that is intended to be real in the concrete.  Even our smallest acts participate in the cross.  We can rest in the acknowledgement that while the way of the cross is the way of joy and community, it is also always disorienting and disruptive to that part of me that wants to know, control, and define.  This is the heart of the drama of trust, risk, and conversion.  

In Tools for Peace, Abbot Andrew Marr writes of the Rule of St. Benedict, “Benedict envisions a community where everybody outdoes everybody else in caring for everybody else. This is quite a contrast to the usual mode of human competition, where people seek to come out on top of the pack by making everybody else a loser.”  He goes on to say, “We prefer nothing to Christ only if we prefer everybody else to ourselves, since Christ preferred everybody to himself.”

Jesus was the Messiah, but he did not have a Messiah complex.  Since we believe that Jesus was the perfect model of human life, living last of all and servant of all, we can learn from observing him how it really works.  How did Jesus live this out?  He showed up. He gave freely of his energy and compassion.  He also needed to renew himself and was aware of and attentive to his needs.  He took time for rest and silence and solitude. He said no. Being last of all and servant of all in no way ever means dismissing or sacrificing our presence, our voice, or our value to anyone or anything.  

Jesus reminds us that being last of all and servant of all sometimes takes the form of speaking the hard truth, naming what is uncomfortable, making an unpopular decision, disrupting and stopping what is harmful and abusive and corrupt.  Last does not mean conformity and servant does not mean passivity.  When we are freed from the game of rivalry and chasing status, we can take risks for the sake of the greater good because there is nothing to defend, no agenda other than that we are all growing and thriving.

The way of the cross gifts us with a new vision of identity. Jesus is not a mascot to defend nor is his call a weapon to inflict pain.  He is the one who leads us into seeing the worth and value of the invisible and lost. The old labels of insider and outsider, worthy and unworthy, acceptable and unacceptable are burned away under the radiant light of a love that has abolished such ways of being.  In the way of the cross, fear becomes identity, rejection becomes community, division becomes welcome - the welcome of Jesus himself. 

Amen.

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Proper 20, Year B: Sunday, September 23, 2018

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Richard Vaggione , OHC
Proper 20, Year B- Sunday, September 23, 2018


To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.

Br. Richard Vaggione, OHC
"How do we exercise power?". . .

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Proper 20 A - September 24, 2017

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Bob Pierson, OHC
Proper 20 - Sunday, September 24,2017



Br. Bob Pierson 

In July of the year 2000, I had an opportunity to attend the Church of St. Mary Madgalene in Toronto with a friend one Sunday morning. My friend wanted to go because he had heard that “St. Mary Mag,“ as I think it was called, had the highest Anglican liturgy in Toronto.  My friend was not disappointed, but I was a bit put off by the whole thing, until it came time for communion.

When we picked up the hymnal to join in the communion hymn, I saw that it was one of my favorite hymn texts, “There’s a Wideness in God’s Mercy.” I had sung that hymn text to several different tunes over the years, and almost knew the text from memory.  So you can imagine my surprise when, all of a sudden, I found a verse that I had never seen before.  It went:



But we make God’s love too narrow by false limits of our own,
And we magnify God’s strictness with a zeal God will not own.


Wow! In that moment, it was as though I heard the voice of God saying to me, “Pay attention!  I’ve been trying to get this message across to you for years.”  As I reflected on these words, I found myself wondering why I’d never seen that verse before, and when I got home I checked every hymnal I could find, including Hymnal 1982. Each hymnal I looked at had a setting of “There’s a Wideness in God’s Mercy,” but none of them contained that particular verse. 


Perplexed by the verse’s absence in Episcopal, Catholic, Lutheran and Methodist hymnals, I decided to check another source, and I googled, “original text of ‘There’s a Wideness in God’s Mercy.’”  Up came the original hymn text—all 12 verses, and sure enough there was my mystery verse, verse #11.  Over the years I’ve continued to look for that verse wherever that hymn is included in a hymnal, and so far I’ve only found it twice—in the Church of England hymnal I found at St. Mary Mag and in a Unitarian hymnal.


I can understand why hymnal editors would not publish 12 verses of anything, but why was that verse almost always left out?  I suspect it’s because most of us don’t really want to believe that God is so loving and merciful.  We favor the idea of a just God, a God who strives for fairness and justice just like we do. Today’s Gospel parable really flies in the face of our desire for fairness from God.


The vineyard owner in the parable is not fair.  His generosity goes way beyond fairness and that upsets those who worked all day. It’s only fair that they should get more than those who worked only 1 hour. To run a business any other way is foolish.  How many workers would show up tomorrow at the beginning of the day, if they knew they could get a full days’ wage for working only one hour?


Of course, Jesus’ purpose in telling this story is not to teach us how to run a business but rather to show us what “the Kingdom of heaven” is like.  God’s love and mercy go way beyond what we think is fair and just.  God’s love is “crazy”. It doesn’t fit our expectations; it’s so much more!  We don’t earn God love.It’s unconditional.


And that’s what Jonah was so upset about. He wanted those Ninevites to pay for their sins, and when God forgave them, he was really upset. He threw a huge tantrum, telling God he wanted to die rather than witness God’s tremendous mercy. What an over-reaction!

And we see that same over-reaction today in different ways. One recent example is the conservative backlash over Fr. James Martin’s new book, “Building A Bridge,” in which he talks about the need for the church to treat LGBT people with “respect,compassion, and sensitivity.” The nastiness of the attacks against him have caused others to “disinvite” him to speak on completely unrelated topics. And all the nastiness is supposedly done in God’s name. Indeed, some do “make God’s love too narrow by false limits of [their] own.”


So where does that leave us?  I sometimes think God should smite all those people who are so judgmental and nasty. But then it occurs to me that I’m doing the same thing to them that they are doing to others. God wants to forgive and heal everyone, and God’s love and mercy are extended to even those who would deny that generous love and mercy to others. 


Perhaps Paul has some words of wisdom for us to take away today when he says “Live your life in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ.” In other words, be God’s love and mercy in the world, and if that means having to suffer a bit, embrace “the privilege not only of believing in Christ but of suffering for him as well….” Jesus struggled to convince His world of God’s great love and mercy, and He calls us to do the same today.  God’s love is not fair; it’s all grace!

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Proper 20 C - Sep 18, 2016

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Robert James Magliula, OHC 
Proper 20 Year C- Sunday, September 18, 2016

Jeremiah 8:18-9:1
1 Timothy 2:1-7
Luke 16:1-13

The shrewd manager
 Today’s collect contrasts being “anxious about earthly things” with “loving things heavenly.” It would be simple to imagine that “loving things heavenly” means some kind of ethereal, spiritual experience. However, the stories Jesus has been telling in Luke’s long narrative of the journey to Jerusalem are earthy, everyday stories that connect to human lives. It’s one of the central ironies of the Christian life that in order to “love things heavenly,” we must turn toward the dust of which we are made, and from there try to envision and build the reign of God. What better way to make the point than with a parable, that grassroots lesson connecting the ordinariness of life with the extraordinary nature of God? None of the parables have baffled interpreters quite like the story of the Dishonest Steward, or perhaps better called the Shrewd Manager.

The story in Luke that comes immediately before today’s story is that of the prodigal son, with the older brother, and the forgiving father. Today’s story may well highlight the same situation: someone in trouble stumbles into grace practically by accident. In the story of the prodigal, the younger son makes very selfish choices that offend nearly everyone, and only comes to his senses when he realizes something must change so that he can survive. Continuing to act in his own self-interest, he returns home, with his speech prepared, only to discover that grace and forgiveness have been waiting for him the whole time, and we have a sense that he may finally get what it means to be loved.

In today’s story, the dishonest manager is in an equally bad situation, and for the same selfish reason. Both son and manager squander the goods of a father and an employer. There was no concern for how their actions would affect others, just for their own gain. When the manager’s employer figures out what he’s done, he continues to act in his own self-interest by cutting deals with his employer’s debtors. His survival depends on them owing him something, because he is sure that manual labor and begging are not options for him. What’s so disturbing to us is that it works! It works even better than he had planned; not only do the people who owe money to his boss get a better deal, the manager himself has regained some status with his employer because of his shrewdness. It’s his shrewdness, not his dishonesty that is commended. He understood how to use what was entrusted to him. In order to be where he wanted to be in the future, how he handled the present counted.

This is crazy, upside-down grace. We who hear this story want him to pay for his dishonesty. What Jesus seems to be highlighting, is not a moral example, but the ridiculous nature of God’s grace, and our call to live in it. Jesus commends the shrewd manager as an example, not for his dishonest dealings, but for his clever solution. But Jesus doesn’t stop there. He says that if this manager – who is “of this world,” meaning someone whose values are entirely self-oriented – has managed to find his way into a better situation, how much more might his followers do, with the grace of God behind them?

People today are no less lost than they were in the time of Jeremiah,  Jesus, or Luke and many times their quandary is precisely the same. Self-interest blinds people to the harm done to themselves and others. Greed flourishes because insecurity reigns. Fear drives people into rigid defensive postures. No one recognizes their role in turning away from God toward their primary concerns that have replaced God. Being prophetic is more than a matter of speaking truth to power. It is also a matter of speaking truth to suffering, to weakness, to laziness, and to failure to take responsibility.

In the Book of Proverbs, we read: “Where there is no vision, the people perish” (Proverbs 29:18).  This is the crisis Jesus, Luke, and Jeremiah address in our readings. The chosen people and the children of light, have lost the vision of God. This parable is a call to reclaim who we are and to renew our vision today for the kingdom of God beyond and among us. What Jesus thinks his followers are capable of is what he himself has been busy doing: healing, reconciling, truth-telling, and proclaiming the kingdom. We must be as clever as the manager in today’s gospel, with a different goal: not serving our self-interest, but the best interests of the world that God loves. When we lose sight of the goal, the vision, when we have no idea where we are going, the riches we possess have no larger value than our need for them. In monastic life it is especially easy to lose the vision, the goal, and to slide into complacency.

Today’ gospel is a reminder, for those inside and outside of monasteries, that when we get anxious about and obsessed with money, status, power, and control, we end up using our best skills for ourselves alone. It’s also a reminder that in spite of ourselves, we are bathed in grace and forgiveness. We are called to be shrewd about recognizing grace and forgiveness and sharing it. We are called to love things heavenly, by loving God’s whole creation.

Forgiveness – which is an act, not a feeling – has positive consequences for everyone. We can get hung up on the undeniable fact that the person in the story, or in our lives, is acting dishonestly or manipulatively. We’d like to distance ourselves. But Jesus chooses his story carefully, and this one sticks in the memory precisely because it’s outside the boundaries of any conventional morality tale.

Forgiveness and its consequences are central to the Gospel. No matter who does the forgiving, it’s going to create ever-widening circles of positive consequences. This cycle is initiated by God’s grace toward us. It precedes our entire existence, and if we choose to be kingdom-builders, we begin by accepting God’s grace, and extending forgiveness to others. There is really no other way to transform our limited sense of justice into the expansive sense of God’s justice and mercy. Forgiveness is the engine that drives our journey toward the kingdom, and we who receive it are called to share it freely.

+Amen.

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Proper 20 B - Sep 20, 2015

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Bernard Jean Delcourt, OHC
Proper 20 B – Sunday, September 20, 2015


Proverbs 31:10-31
James 3:13-4:3, 7-8a
Mark 9:30-37
"Jesus Discourses With His Disciples", James Tissot, Brooklyn Museum
In our gospel passage of today, Jesus tries to travel incognito through Galilee. It was not so easy for Jesus to have alone time with his disciples to teach them. His public teaching and his healing ministry had made him immensely popular. It made it all the more difficult for him to have time to teach his disciples beyond what he taught in public.

A good time for Jesus to teach his disciples was when they walked from one town to the next. At those times, Jesus’ disciples could have walked close to him to listen to his teaching.

Their traveling time was usually a privileged time for the disciples to learn from Jesus because they were mostly undisturbed by the pressures of expectant crowds.

It is on one such walking stage of their journey that Jesus reminded the disciples for the second time of how he would die and rise again.

Only a few days earlier, Peter had made the confession that Jesus was the Messiah. Messiah was a title loaded with plenty of expectations for the Jewish people.

In Mark’s gospel, Jesus forewarns the disciples about his death and resurrection three different times. It was a difficult message for the disciples to hear and receive and digest; and it bore repeating.

Jesus wanted them to understand how his understanding of being the Messiah was different from what Jewish tradition saw in that role.

It was not about overturning the Roman domination system to restore the integrity of a united Kingdom of Israel. Jesus’ glory would come from vanquishing sin and death.

But the disciples don’t get it. Throughout his gospel, Mark keeps portraying the disciples as having difficulties understanding Jesus and being faithful followers of Jesus.

It’s as if Mark is constantly showing us an example of what not to do to be a disciple of Jesus. The disciples don’t understand and they don’t ask for clarification.

Maybe we’re shown in the negative how we need to accept a surprising God and how we are to keep asking for insight from God to follow Jesus.

*****

Then Jesus and the disciples arrive at home base; “the house” at Capernaum says the gospel. There again, Jesus and the disciples have some time to themselves. And Jesus asks them about what they were talking about while they spread themselves out on their way towards Capernaum.

Probably, their group had elongated along the way and Jesus could only overhear the tone of their distant conversation. But he could tell there was some heat in the discussion. Maybe Jesus overheard bits and pieces of the argument which informed him of its nature. In any case, the disciples feel caught red-handed and they stay silent. They were bickering with each other about their honor status.

In an early Eastern Mediterranean society such as Galilee, people would have valued honor above all other goods. They would have monitored with minutiae how honor accrued to themselves and their family, their clan.

After the confession of Peter, the disciples now saw themselves connected with the most honor-rich person in their society, the Messiah from God. They would expect huge honor to accrue to them from being so closely connected with the Messiah.

But a puzzling question remained. Who had gained the most honor in this connection? As any Israelite of their time, the disciples wanted to know where they stood in the new honor-bound pecking order of their group. As long as the pecking order was not confirmed a group was bound to be conflict-prone until they had established the order that ensured peace in the group.

But Jesus turns the disciples’ world vision upside down once again and dismisses the disciples’ anxiety about honor. Not only is his messiahship not about military victory over the pagan occupier, but leadership according to Jesus is to be exercized through servanthood not through mastery over others.

The greek word rendered as servant in English is “diakonos.” It evokes one who runs errands and serves at the table. In an Israelite household of the time, such a servant held the least honor in the house. He had to defer to most everyone else in the household. The only other household members who had as little honor status as the servant were the young children.

So Jesus tells the disciples that they need to let go of their vicarious honor accumulation; they need to let go of seeking status. They are to seek the least honorific position of servanthood in order to be first in the Reign of God. The first will be last. The diakonos is a leader in the Reign of God.

And to illustrate his point, Jesus gets hold of a little child and takes this little child in his arms. Children were not highly valued in first century Palestine. While still a minor, a child was on a par with a slave in the honor system that governed society.

Child mortality was horrendous, 30% of children died in infancy, another 30% before the age of 6. The old age safety of having children lied in numbers not in the quality of relationship with any single child. Parents would have many children, in the hope that enough would reach adulthood to support them in their productive activities and in their old age.

And so, when Jesus picks up a child and sits it in his lap, it is not a Hallmark moment but another shocking revelation to the disciples that in order to be first, they will need to be like the humblest participants of the mainstream’s honor system.

Jesus is underlining that in order to be first in the Reign of God, we have to be willing to be servants of servants. In welcoming the humblest members of society as Christ, we are welcoming Jesus and therefore getting closer to God.

So the Son of Man, a title only Jesus gave himself, is not going to take us out of all our worldly trouble, but he is going to save us from death and sin.

We are here to build and find the Ream of God where we are, not to escape the difficulties of living, at least, not this side of death. The Realm of God is within us and outside of us. We only have to be willing participants of the Reign-in-process which vanquishes sin and death.

And we are to serve God in those whom we would normally consider ourselves superior to. In doing so, we are to value the place of the last ones, of the least ones amongst us, in order to deserve belonging with God.

*****
Lord, help me serve You in those who appear to be the least of all in our eyes. They are first and foremost in your eyes. Help us remember that you served to the very end, making the ultimate sacrifice for us. Help us to be willing and able to do that too for the love of you. Amen.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Proper 20 B - Sep 23, 2012


Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Brother James Michael Dowd, OHC
Proper 20, Year B - Sunday, September 23, 2012


Wisdom 1:16-2:1, 12-22
James 3:13-4:3, 7-8a
Mark 9:30-37

Who is Wise and Understanding Among You?

I find myself intrigued by the Letter of James, part of which was our second reading this morning, because of the question that reading begins with: Who is wise and understanding among you? As the Novice Master, I have the great joy to study once again so many of the foundational texts of the monastic movement along with our novices as together we grow in our vocations. And the section of James that we read today seems, to me at least, to be filled with monastic wisdom.

The answer to the rhetorical question that James begins with is to show by your good life that your works are done with gentleness born of wisdom. Show by your good life. That says it all, really. It's not what we say we do, “oh, I'm a great pray-er” or “oh, I really identify with the suffering” or “oh, I'm so detached from everything, I can barely feel my own body!” No, Christianity is about showing, doing, being. When I studied for the theater, one of my favorite classes was Introduction to Play writing, in which, on the very first day you learn the most important rule about either play writing or directing: “show them, don't tell them.” And that seems like a good rule of thumb for the monastic life, indeed, the Christian life.

But it is not just about showing them. It is about showing them with gentleness born of wisdom. And James tells us what that gentle wisdom looks like. It is pure, it is peaceable, it is willing to yield, it is full of mercy and it is full of good fruits. It is, in other words, something that other Christians and non-Christians as well, can see in you.

James also tells us what gentleness born of wisdom is not. It is not envious, it is not ambitious, it is not boastful, it is not filled with lies. There is something quite practical and obvious in both of these lists – and sometimes we need that on our Christian journeys.

But it is the next question that James asks that has had me really reflecting on what it means to live a monastic life, a Christian life. I'd like to read again these few verses to you:
Those conflicts and disputes among you, where do they come from? Do they not come from your cravings that are at war within you? You want something and do not have it; so you commit murder. And you covet something and cannot obtain it; so you engage in disputes and conflicts.

If you think of troubles, conflicts, disputes, wars that rage within your own family, in your community, your parish, your workplace, in our nation this election season, or across the world, it seems to me that this could be a highly instructive lesson for any Christian to contemplate.
But it's the word cravings that most stands out to me. Cravings, James tells us, are at war within us. In fact, cravings can and do kill people – and whole groups of people. This past summer I had the great blessing of taking a vacation with my family in Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. On three different occasions, I heard the same story from three different guides on various hikes. They each told us that now that eagles are protected from being hunted, the most common form of death for an eagle out west is by drowning. It seems the talons of the eagle, which are their main tool for hunting,  are extremely sharp and dig quite deeply into their prey.  When an eagle dives into a river for the purpose of hunting a fish, occasionally the fish is to heavy for them to lift out of the water and, unable to release them, the eagle is dragged under that water and drowned.

And every time I heard that story, I had to think of my own issues with craving. Craving is a theme that is very important to desert monasticism and was in the early days referred to as “the passions” or the “eight principle vices.” In the Middle Ages it would become known as “the seven deadly sins” and very often today they are described as addictions – however many there might be. The first of these cravings, passions, addictions, and the most troublesome for me, is often known as “gluttony,” which in some Twelve Step circles is known as “compulsive eating.”

And ever since my trip to Wyoming, when I think about the eagle drowning because of its own cravings, I can't help but to think of myself and in particular, my own spiritual journey. There have been times, when because of my own cravings, I have been drowning – slowly for sure – but drowning none the less.

This can be agony and it puts me at war within myself. I know that this is not a healthy way to live or a holy way to live, but there are times when the craving  overwhelms and I dive for that food that is just too heavy for me to bear. This craving has been such a consistent theme for me throughout my life that there was a time I believed that I would never be able to breathe fresh air again, that I'd drown.

Food is the weapon I choose that makes war on myself, which ultimately causes war to be waged on others as well. While I have never been physically violent with anyone, I have been known, interestingly enough, to wage that war with my tongue. And as we learned from the Letter of James last week, the tongue can set whole forests ablaze. But folks pick all kinds of poison, all kinds of passions – alcohol, drugs, sex, power, work, gambling, shopping, and any number of other addictive behaviors or deadly sins. Whichever way of looking at it you prefer, the result is the same: war rages within you.

But in fact, we are not helpless. There is a path that both our monastic forebears and the disciples of the Twelve Step movement have put forward to help us. James, in fact, enunciates the basics of these steps: “submit to God and resist the devil. And how do we do that? John Cassian, the great monastic teacher, passes down to us in the fifth book of The Institutes that the great Desert Father,  Abba Macarius, taught that submitting to God and resisting the devil was to “restrain the movements of the mind (in other words, check your emotions), forget slights, reject sadness, and disdain sorrows and setbacks – as if we were going to die daily.”

In other words, live as Jesus taught us to live. Accept the fact that we do not know when the Lord is coming or when we are going. In contemporary parlance, “live in the moment,” but not “for the moment”. When I have lived in the moment, I have never starved to death – I have never been obsessed with eating. When I live for the moment, I can't wait to get my hands on, and my mouth around, a prepackaged cupcake. The passions, those cravings that are deadly to many of us, are so much easier to be liberated from when we live in the moment, as opposed to living in some real or imagined past when we were drowning because we are so hurt, so lost, so guilty, so adrift.

The control of the passions leads us to cease making war on ourselves and on others. It is a contemplative way of being that is a journey toward health, wholeness and holiness. It is our call as disciples of Christ. And I think this goes beyond the personal to the collective. All of this has implications for not only us as individuals, but as a community, as a nation, and as the human race. Which is something to think and pray about as the shouting of the campaign season nearly overwhelms us. The eagle, our national symbol, can drown when its cravings overwhelm it. As a nation, we crave many things. As I ponder this election, I find myself thinking about that very issue for the nation: what is it that we Americans crave that might drown us? The list seems uncomfortably long to me.  As we seek wisdom and understanding, we might want to, as James says, draw near to God, for it is then that God draws near to us.  AMEN.


Sunday, September 18, 2011

Proper 20 A - Sep 18, 2011

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. James Dowd, OHC
Proper 20 A - Sunday, September 18, 2011

Jonah 3:10 – 4:11
Philippians 1:21-30
Matthew 20:1-16

Picture credit: Watton On The Web

The Dove of Truth

In the Name of Mercy, Love, and Truth. Amen.

Over the years of my professional life I had the good fortune of developing friendships with three different different people who worked in human resources and two other people who worked on negotiating teams for unions. And in all five cases, I think I know exactly how each would have responded to Jesus if he told them the parable we just heard. Unfair! They would have cried. The HR types would have thought that story was terribly unfair to management, while the union types would have felt that it was unfair to labor.

And by human standards they would be right.  Management should not be expected to pay people for work that was not done, and Labor would agree that it was unfair to the person who worked a full day to get paid the same as one who worked for one hour. But Jesus, as the culmination of all the prophets, was not your ordinary man. He was, in fact, here to teach us once and for all about God's infinite mercy.

This is a lesson we seem to need to learn over and over again and Scripture is filled with the stories of God's mercy. One of my favorite stories in the Hebrew Scriptures is that of Jonah because I can so relate to him. This is not the perfect prophet who hears God's call, responds brilliantly, and is remembered for his holiness. No, this is a prophet that certainly does hear God's call, then argues with God, flees from God, ignores God, gets himself thrown overboard by a bunch of pagan sailors who are actually more faithful to God than he is, ends up in the belly of a very large fish, makes a little retreat in that belly, prays quite fervently, gets spit up on land, argues some more with God, finally agrees to do what God was asking him to do all along, calls the people of Nineveh to repentance, ends up sitting outside of town sulking – and all this in just three chapters where our story this morning picks up. Now that is a prophet I can relate to. In fact, it is a prophet I have been wrestling with for a while now.

Jonah is perhaps the most problematic of all the prophets from a historical perspective. Time, place, setting all seem somewhat confused, to say nothing of the fish. Jewish legend teaches that Jonah was the little boy of the widow of Zarephath, raised from the dead by the Prophet Elijah. His name, Jonah, means “Dove” and the first verse of the book tells us that his father's name is Amittai (Amatay)which means The Truth. So Yonah ben Amatay is “Dove, son of The Truth.” Now to a Christian that sounds especially holy. But to ancient Jews that name might have evoked laughter or perhaps an ironic smile, for a dove in this context was one that flitted about from “truth” to “truth” with small “t's”, and occasionally landed on the Truth, with a capital “t”. I would argue that Jonah's message for God's people is so important, so profound, that a Christian interpretation of his name has ultimately prevailed, as a kind of prefiguring of the Son of Truth who was still to come.

The reason I feel so connected to Jonah has to do with his constant wrestling with God. He is a character that Sholem Aleichem could have written and was perhaps inspired by. This ancient Tevye was forever bargaining, arguing and running from God – only to return, in order to obey God's call, and then to ask one more question, to pose one more challenge.

Our story this morning picks up with the fact that Jonah, having been spit up on land has finally gone to Nineveh and walked across that great city announcing God's judgment that will be reigned down on all living creatures within its confines.

And here it is important to know something about Nineveh. The ruins of Nineveh lie directly across the Tigris River from Mosul in present day Iraq. In fact, Mosul' suburbs still cover much of those ruins. Now during Jonah's life, Nineveh was a major Assyrian city, though not its capital. By the time the Book of Jonah was written, however, Nineveh was the capital of Assyria. This was no ordinary capital of an alien state or even an enemy state. This was the capital of an Empire which was the dire enemy of the Jewish people and one so evil that is has been compared to the Berlin of the Nazis. Genocide, mass enslavement, torture, desecration of religious sites and the most vicious ways of killing people in an agonizing and grotesque way are some of the highlights of this Empire.

So Jonah and the Chosen People had good reason to fear the Assyrians, and even understandable reasons for hating them. God tells Jonah to proclaim to the people of Nineveh that “Forty days more and Nineveh shall be overthrown.” Jonah's resistance to proclaiming that message was not out of a lack of faith or even fear. His resistance,  having been steeped in the faith of his forebears, was due to the fact that, at least in this case, God's word was probably not going to be any good. Jonah rebelled against the fact that God, being who he is, would not guarantee the destruction of Nineveh. He knew God to well. To be sure, if the people of Nineveh did not repent, then God could be counted on to destroy that wicked city. But if the people chose to repent, then God would most likely show mercy to even these most evil Assyrians.

In our time the Hebrew Scriptures often get a bad wrap. People like to write off this beautiful collection of inspired texts as “God's way to smite everyone down.” But in fact, for those steeped in the faith, they hear the Hebrew Scriptures as filled with God's attempt to inspire repentance on the part of the people so that he can share his mercy. This would of course culminate with the Incarnation, Passion and Death of Christ as God's penultimate attempt to call to us, plead with us, beg us to repent of our own evil ways.

Well, even before that, the people of Nineveh not only heard God's call as proclaimed by Jonah, but heeded it as well. For forty days they repented, wore sack-cloth, sat in ashes, and even had their animals do the same. God was so pleased with his Assyrian children that he forgave them and showered abundant mercy upon them. And this really ticked off Jonah.

So he marched himself out of town, sat down to sulk, then told God off. Jonah rails at God for being too merciful, slow to anger, overflowing with love and totally forgetting that he had said anything about punishing the Ninevehites. And it is God's response to the crabby Jonah that is so moving to me: “Should I not” God says “be concerned about Nineveh, that great city, in which there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand persons who do not know their right hand from the their left?”

And there it is: God knows we are ignorant of his ways. We do not know our right from our left. We know justice, He knows mercy. We want revenge, He wants mercy. We have sin, He has mercy. Mercy. Mercy. Mercy. The entire Judea-Christian tradition might well be summed up with that word: Mercy. God is desperate to share his mercy, so desperate that he would send his own Son to make mercy Incarnate. To live mercy among us, to die in mercy for us, to rise with mercy so each of his brothers and sisters might do the same, those 120,000 Ninevites being just the tip of the iceberg.

But to live into God's mercy requires repentance, be that on an individual basis or a communal basis. Repentance is defined by New Testament scholars with  the Greek word  metnoia, which translates as “understanding  something differently after thinking  something over.”  It implies a turning around or  heading  in a different direction. Thomas Keating, the Trappist monk, says that Jesus’ call to “repent  is an invitation to grow up and become a fully mature human being.”   The word repentance has a negative connotation for many people. In an earlier time in our lives it may have been used as a club to beat us over the head.   But repentance, if we take Father Keating’s definition, calls us to be adults. To turn around and face the reality of our situation, the reality of our sin.

And what is the definition of sin? Plainly put, sin is the willful separation of humanity from God, ignoring God, behaving in ways that are not God-like. Biblical sin is very often much more communal, rather than personal. Certainly personal sin does occur, but so much of the focus in the Ancient mindset was communal. So, for example, Jonah wasn't concerned with the king's sin, he was concerned with how the entire city of Nineveh had separated themselves from God? By committing intense and outrageous violence against people all over the the present day Middle East and Central Asia, was how those Ninevehites had separated themselves from God. But eventually, these people heard Jonah's message from God and turned themselves around.

And with all this wrestling with Jonah and with God that I have been doing of late, I cannot help but wonder what Jonah would say to us, to the community of Americans, if he were sent to us to speak God's word right here, right now in September of 2011. From the time of the earliest European settlers in Jamestown, Santa Fe, or Plymouth, we Americans have fancied ourselves a Christian nation, one that has been set apart – the city on the hill. And yet, if we were to spend some time looking at our history, and certainly to these last ten years, I wonder if we could really claim that our right hand knows what our left is doing.

It seems to me that Jonah might know that we are in great need of God's mercy.  While not the Assyrian Empire, in September 2011, the Unites States is currently this world's Empire. In these last ten years, we have reigned down violence on nations throughout the Middle East and Central Asia, on the innocent and guilty alike, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children, women, and men, in a quest to protect ourselves from a handful of terrorists. We continue to be willing to look away as some of God's children are tortured in the name of our security. The American Empire is fueled by oil which enslaves our own people to its use and to supporting on-going war in the oil producing regions of the world.

I think Yonah ben Attay, Dove, son of the Truth, would point us to Jesus, the Son of God and would call us to turn away from our idols of oil, weapons, and Empire. Yonah ben Attay would, I think, turn us to repentance, to  worship the one true God who is so filled with life and mercy.  And I think he would turn us away from those lifeless and merciless idols which can only lead to enslavement, torture, and a merciless death.

In all my wrestling with this I hear a very faint echo that seems to be getting stronger: “Should I not” God seems to be asking “be concerned about America, that great country, in which there are more than  300 million persons who do not know their right hand from their left?” Mercy, Mercy, Mercy, God calls to us. Mercy is God's invitation to us – right here, right now, today. Thank God, his mercy endures forever. AMEN.