Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Friday, July 11, 2025
The Feast of Saint Benedict, July 11, 2025
Sunday, July 10, 2022
St. Benedict - July 10, 2022
Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Sunday, July 11, 2021
Feast of Saint Benedict - July 11, 2021
Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Saturday, July 11, 2020
The feast of St. Benedict - July 11, 2020
When animals still had the ability to speak, in the African
jungle, a story is told of an encounter between a tortoise and a lion. They met
one afternoon as both were hustling for food. The lion told the tortoise “you
know I am going to eat you!” The tortoise was puzzled because ordinarily,
tortoises are not usually on the lions’ menu but the lion repeated once
again...” I am telling you that today I
am going to eat you!” As you might know, the tortoise is the third slowest
animal after the snail and the chameleon and so there was no way the tortoise
would escape. The tortoise pondered the news for a moment and then told the
lion.” I have no problem with you eating me but before you do, please give me
five minutes”.
The lion agreed and then the tortoise started moving in
circles round a reasonably well sized area. The tortoise made the grass in the
area flat and some got uprooted. After he finished, he told the lion “now you
can eat me”. It was now the lion’s turn to be puzzled and he asked the tortoise
“what were you doing”. The tortoise told the lion “what I was doing was to
leave a mark so that those who pass by here will know that though you ate me,
there was a struggle. That mark will indicate that there was a struggle and
that I was not an easy meal for you!” ...We shall come back to this in a
moment...
Today we are celebrating the feast of St. Benedict, a law
giver, a spiritual master and father of numerous monks and nuns to whom western
civilization owes its survival during the so called dark ages and that earned
him the title of the patron of Europe. Benedict was not an academician, he was
not a great missionary or a renown preacher like the apostles or the early
church fathers before him. He was not a dramatic follower of the gospel like
Francis of Assisi (who shed his clothing in public at his conversion) and
numerous others after him. He was just an ordinary monk, doing ordinary things
that monks do.
How then, you may
ask, did a simple monk who spent most of his life enclosed in a monastery earn
the title ‘Patron of Europe’? The answer to that lies in the rule he wrote for
himself and his followers, all summarized up in the opening statement… ”Listen
carefully my son to the master’s instructions, and attend to them with the ear
of your heart. This is advice from a father who loves, welcome it and
faithfully put it into practice”. The Master Benedict is speaking about here is
our God and father who loves us through our Lord Jesus Christ and who so cares
for us, as to give us nuggets of wisdom to live by so that we can get closer to
him in this life and attain eternal happiness with him when all is reunited
with him.
These nuggets of wisdom come to us this morning in the
portion of the book of Proverbs that we heard in our first reading. Proverbs
are simple and clear guidelines that are easy to follow if one chooses to, for
instance, the road sign that tells you No Left Turn. You can still turn left
but you would be very unwise because the consequences of doing so could be
fatal not only to you but to others as well. There is a keyword in today's
first reading that helps us to understand it. The word is IF.
If you accept my word, if you treasure my commandments, if
you make your ear attentive to wisdom, if you incline your heart to
understanding, if you cry out for (insight)or discernment, if you look for it
as if it was silver, if you set your store by the commandements, my son if you
take my words to heart. IF, IF, IF…. and what does IF imply? It implies a
choice, an invitation by God, a commandment, but we have to exercise freedom.
We have to choose to enter into the journey of doing the will of God. IF you do
A, B will happen and of course IF you don't do A, C will happen. Every choice
as we well know has a consequence. The rule of Benedict is a book of IF’s but
the first word as already mentioned is LISTEN.
Listen to the word of God, listen to his commandments,
listen to wisdom, to proverbs, to the teaching of saints, to you superiors, to
your conscience, to the truth. Be open and listen before you speak. God will
speak to you if you listen. God will make himself known to you if you slow
down, God will make his presence felt if we are humble, God will show himself
to us if we pray. We have to take God's word to heart, set store by his
commandments, turn our ear to wisdom, apply our heart to truth, cry out for
discernment and understanding, and only then will we understand what the fear
of the Lord is and discover the knowledge of God.
The knowledge of God comes if we turn to God and open our
hearts to seek him. If we go back to our lion and tortoise story, the Moral of
that story is that we should leave a mark in whatever we do and more so as
Christians. Benedict Listened to his conscience and to the word of God and
withdrew to the wilderness of Subiaco and later to Monte Cassino and by his way
of life and the rule that he left for monastics left a mark in the world. Like
the tortoise in our story that had set out to search for food and not death,
Benedict never set out to leave a mark or to make himself famous. He simply
converted his way of life to listen and follow God and went about living his
conversion and conviction.
People listening to the truth of the word of God have been a
great wisdom of the faith and a light in darkness for civilizations since the
time of Jesus, hence leaving their mark as people of faith. Benedictine monks
and nuns have kept the faith alive and civilizations alive throughout the
centuries and by so doing left a mark. We too are called to leave a mark as
followers of Christ through the example of our spiritual father St. Benedict.
We should strive to make our monasteries, especially Holy Cross Monastery, not
just good places to visit but power houses of prayer and light in darkness.
The same applies to those of us in parishes and in our
homes. Our parishes and Christian homes should be beacons of light, islands of
peace and tranquility, of love and of hope. We are called as Christians and as
monastics to leave our mark because christian living is not always bread and
butter but a life of struggle with sin, with our ego, with the devil.
The golden question this morning is When you and I die, what
mark will we leave? St. Paul in the Second reading we heard from the Letter to
the Philippians urges us to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling
for it is God who is at work in us, enabling us to will and to work for His
good pleasure! Paul also cautions us against murmuring and arguing, something
Benedict counsels us to be vigilant about, time and again in his rule! Only
then can we be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the
midst of a crooked and perverse generation in which we shine like stars in the
world!
Paul in our reading today is simply telling us that before
we even think of leaving a mark when we are dead, we ought to be shining like
stars already! We are truly living as Christians in the midst of a crooked and
perverse generation made worse by the inaction or false doctrines and teachings
from those who call themselves Christians! Our present moment is characterised
by the darkness of racism and hate perpetuated or given theological backing by
some so called conservative Christians in the midst of a disease of pandemic
proportions.
The present moment is indeed the dark ages of the 21st
century! Let us turn to St. Benedict and ask him to pray with us for this
country and indeed for the whole world as we try to understand what our purpose
is. It is the Light of Christ that has formed us and wisdom of the gospel that
has sustained us and it is only that light that will get us out of this present
darkness. St. Benedict urges us to listen and therefore before we come to any
solutions or before our sly politicians come up with any more clever ideas, let
us pray for ourselves and for them that they may listen. That they may listen
to the wisdom of God found in his word so that the light of the Gospel may
shine in this land and throughout the entire world. Amen
Thursday, July 11, 2019
Feast of St. Benedict - Thursday, July 11, 2019
Feast of St. Benedict - Thursday, July 11, 2019
Proverbs 2:1-9
Philippians 2:12–16
Luke 14:27–33
Click here for an audio version of the sermon.

The beginning and the end of Jesus’ words here, taking up the cross and following and then giving up possessions, form the theological source of two great themes integral to monastic life. St. Benedict emphasizes both of these practices in the rule, especially the necessity of humility and the prohibitions against private ownership. St. Benedict does not believe, as is sometimes the critique, that thinking rightly of ourselves is wrong or that material goods are evil. Rather, these practices are set within the larger vision in the rule of running toward life, toward our heavenly home, and therefore of necessity away from the illusions of status and security that claim our identity and distort that path. For Benedict, entrance into the Christian journey in a monastic vocation is a move from an old life based on hierarchy and power to a life of self-sacrificial service and identification with a community. A particular kind of community that has transcended the empire-based dynamic of oppressor over oppressed and has chosen to live in egalitarian brotherhood. The only identity that matters in the monastery is brother. The connection between this gospel and the rule is fairly obvious in these two sayings – they become in Benedict’s hands related to obedience and stability. Jesus’ images in the middle, of estimating to build a tower and considering battle, inform Benedict’s theology of discernment and formation and are closely related to the vow of conversion. I would like to dig down into the way in which the inclusion of these two metaphors within the discussion of discipleship illumines life in a community and under a rule.
Early in Jesus’ ministry, his simple call to follow him is a stage of exploration and testing. There are hints in the synoptic gospels made explicit in the Gospel of John that not everyone who began to follow kept following to the end. Time goes on and the nature of discipleship unfolds. The radicality of what was asked turned many off of Jesus. As the gospels progress, Jesus is more and more explicit about the need to move from exploration to commitment. He is more interested in people following him with conscious intention and fidelity than with large crowds of spectators merely waiting to see a miracle. As Luke points Jesus toward Jerusalem and the climactic showdown that leads to his crucifixion, the stakes get higher, the conditions more radical, and the urgency of allegiance absolute. In these middle chapters of his gospel, Luke alternates between encounters and parables of God’s mercy toward the sinful and outcast and sharp criticism of those whose allegiance to prejudice and power to the exclusion of the neediest has hardened their hearts and frozen their compassion. The disciple is to be a free person; free of family obligations, free of possessions, free of agenda, free to offer their whole selves and enter into a way that resists the ways of empire. The first blushes of excitement and wonder must give way to the reality of the cost of discipleship. Between today and the ultimate, joyful assurance of God’s reign in the end will be suffering. The disciples come to see that Jesus is more than a typical rabbi, more than a miracle worker, but one who will model self-giving even unto death and ask disciples to be willing to follow in those steps in commitment if not in actuality.
The images of building and battle come in the form of rhetorical questions. Jesus likes to pair together what we can read as the allegory of the foundation of our lives and our response to all that seeks to thwart and undermine life. Obviously, Jesus is saying, considering and determining are called for before entering into a complex and risky project such as the construction of a watchtower or a battle against a formidable enemy. Just as there is prudent discernment in such temporal acts, how much more must there be in the eternal decision to become a disciple. If we are careful and realistic in our earthly pursuits of our goals, how much more must we be with our souls? Jesus is not interested in sneaking in some fine print at the end of your disciple contract. He is utterly transparent and honest in his conditions. He simply wants the potential disciple to be as transparent and honest in their answer.
I have known people who liked the idea of being a disciple, who wanted the benefits of all that God promises, certainly wanted to go to heaven, but were not so interested in the formation between here and heaven, especially if it is costly (and it is always costly). “I tried religion but it did not work for me”. Usually the “did not work” is code for “it was not instant and easy.” I can empathize with the impulse to jump from plan to completion. Once I set my face toward a project, once I see the value, that it is possible, that I want it, then I just want it to be done – now. The spiritual smoothing of my rough edges between the intent and the completion – the formation of patience, fortitude, endurance, and hope that inevitably needs to happen - seems like a frustrating waste of time. Show me some results and let me show off my success. How often I start doing just to be doing something or rush into the adrenaline-thrill of battle long before I have thought through what exactly is going to happen or even entertained the vague notion that my fantasy, however real it seemed when I started, was not rational at all, and suddenly I have run out of spiritual materials to keep going or I am being trampled by the enemy of my own stubborn agenda. It turns out the teachable moments, the processes between here and heaven are important and unavoidable.
Conversion is about sitting down and considering and determining our lives first. What I am I thinking about, talking about, doing, and to what end – where does this path go? Before construction begins, before the battle is engaged, we need clarity. We need an honest assessment. The nurturing of our intent which is the energy to continue on the path of conversion, is the essential precursor to faithful action. Following Jesus is not whatever I decide it to be. Being a disciple is not following the Jesus I want. It is a long, slow look at who he is and what is being asked of me. The possibility for delusion is great, but the light of truth is greater. Sometimes what I discover is I am on a journey on my terms, giving parts of myself, following a made-up Jesus and am headed into the abyss of resentment and loneliness. To sit down and consider and determine is to discover that my plan cannot work. The tower will fall, I will lose the battle. Better an honest “no” than a conditional or qualified “yes”. An honest “no” is good – it has possibility and hope for renewed conversion if I am willing to start afresh.
Because we are an action-obsessed culture, much of what is defined as Christian life is talking, going, and doing. That is all well and good and Jesus likes that, but here he says, “sit down”. Sitting down with honesty, clarity, and decisiveness leads to action that is wise and fruitful. In a sense, Jesus is describing our whole lives and vocations, the big picture between plan and completion is my life and every day is a participation in the rhythm of discernment and engagement. Today is building on the “yes” of my commitment and moving toward the end when the construction is over, the sounds of battle stilled, and I give my life back to God. The moments, the opportunities, the encounters between here and heaven are sacred elements in the foundation of my life and my opposition to all that would sabotage that life. They may seem trivial, mundane, ordinary, unseen, unexciting – but these middle bits between the excitement of beginning and the graduation into the next life are, for Jesus and Benedict, the very things that reveal my desire, expose my illusions, and clarify my intention. Nothing is wasted, nothing is unimportant, no moment is separate from the potential to intent today the life I want for the rest of my journey.
We do not know all that entering into this journey will ask of us. We cannot determine at the beginning how it will unfold. But we can discern our intent, our desire, our commitment to keep asking. Jesus is not expecting us to predict the future, but he is asking us to step into the unknown and meet him, already there and waiting, with the grace we need to welcome the gifts and trials that life will bring along the way, toward life and peace, along the run to our heavenly home. Amen.
Wednesday, July 18, 2018
The Feast of St. Benedict: Preached at Saint John’s in the Village, NYC Sunday, July 15, 2018
Br. Josép R. Martínez-Cubero, OHC
The Feast of St. Benedict- Sunday, July 15, 2018
To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.
![]() |
Br. Josép Martínez-Cubero, OHC |
So Benedict decided to abandon the life in which he had been brought up, and taking his childhood nurse, traveled about 40 miles to Affide, a community at the foot of a mountain. He found a mentor named Romanus, a monk in a nearby monastery, who encouraged him to become a hermit. And so, Benedict lived as a hermit for three years, embracing prayer, silence, and solitude. During and after that time, stories of his miracles spread, and a community grew around him. He eventually founded twelve communities of monks in Subiaco, Lazio, Italy each with their own abbot, before moving to Monte Casino in the mountains of Italy where he lived in a thirteenth monastery as abbot with a few select brothers.
Benedict’s main achievement is a document he seems to have prepared throughout the duration of his life containing precepts for his monks, and which today is known as the Rule of Saint Benedict. The document is heavily influenced by the writings of John Cassian, another Christian monk before his time, who is noted for his role in bringing the ideas and practices of Christian monasticism to the early medieval West. The Rule of Saint Benedict also shows to have been the editing and reworking of an earlier and very severe monastic rule called “The Rule of the Master. It is the only piece of Benedict’s writing we have, but what he adds, omits, rearranges, and revises from The Rule of the Master tells us more about him than any legend surrounding his life.
A rule is essentially a code of practice and discipline. Since the beginning of time, rules and laws have been important in the way faithful people live their lives. Some rules delineate a code of justice thought to be pleasing to God. There is no need to figure out what is right or wrong but what the rule says and follow it because it pleases God. Other rules define how to live in community in a code of holiness. The aim with these kinds of rules is that all should be treated equally as beloved children of God. This way of living requires constant prayer and discernment, and it is, at times, messy business. So is the Rule of Saint Benedict, which can be an unappealing document for anyone who is looking for a fixed set of regulations.
Benedict’s Rule is a reflection steeped in Scripture that describes a way to live in community so that the Reign of God can be manifested. It is a human journey into the heart of God. It called for a community where all had the same access to books for their education; a community where all ate the same adequate amount of food and drink; a community where all had a voice, even the newest members. It sadly sounds like an ideal that could make many political and religious leaders of our day very uncomfortable.
I come to you today from Holy Cross Monastery in West Park, NY. It is one of the houses of The Order of the Holy Cross, an international Benedictine order of men in the Anglican Communion. At West Park, we are a multigenerational and diverse community of eighteen men. Among other things, I serve my community as the Director of Associates of Holy Cross, 415 men, and women who we support, and who support us in all our ministries. The Associates of Holy Cross is what in other Benedictine communities is called Oblate Program.
Oblates are Christians who desire to live out their Baptismal Covenant in association with a monastic order, and inspired by Benedict's Rule. Associates of Holy Cross are not only recipients of our blessings, but are also a source of blessings and help for our monastery. I share this with you today because we monks are flawed human beings, just as anyone else, but who have made the radical (and awesome!) choice to live in a monastery. But our associates are deacons, and priests and bishops, yes, but also students, doctors, housewives, carpenters, accountants, teachers, musicians, lawyers, grandparents, single mothers and single fathers, partnered or married parents, and the list goes on and on! Our associates are from all walks of life, and from around the world. In their association with us, our three-fold monastic vow of obedience, stability, and conversion of life becomes the three principles by which they center their lives. So I want to share with you a few thoughts about each of these three principles.
Obedience is not a particularly popular word today, and in fact, can be thought of, if misunderstood, as potentially dangerous in the world we live in. The Latin root for obedience is “obaudire”, to listen thoroughly. The very first word of the Rule of Saint Benedict is “Listen.” Benedict asks us to listen to his instructions with the ear of the heart. Not just with the mind as in an intellectual exercise, but also with the heart, which is the root of love. So we lovingly listen to the voice of God speaking to us in Sacred Scripture, and the traditions of the Church. We lovingly listen in our daily circumstances and relationships. We lovingly listen to the words of other people. We lovingly listen to our own hearts. By lovingly listening, we carefully discern God’s will and translate it into action.
Stability, “to stay put”, makes us confront our tendencies to avoid God, others, and ourselves. All too often we use our free times to escape into fantasies that remove us from the present moment. Through the monastic principle of stability, we engage in the hard, ongoing, and transformative work of being present where God has called us and where our choices have lead us. And we engage in the radical love that challenges us to learn about, respect, honor, and even celebrate what has been called the otherness of the other, in all his or her difference, and wonder.
Conversion of life is central to Benedictine life and has to do with the paschal mystery of death and life as it is lived out daily through a lifetime. It is about being broken and renewed. It is about being in the hands of the living God who meets us most reliably at the point of our temptations, self-doubts, and discomforts with a never-ending invitation to holiness. Conversion of life reminds us of the central symbol of transformation in Christianity- a naked, bleeding human nailed to a cross. It reminds us that there cannot be resurrection before crucifixion. It reminds us that there is a broken, wounded part inside each and every one of us, and that the one thing we all have in common as human beings is our powerlessness. And we can only come to terms with this when we grow in humility.
The longest chapter of Benedict’s Rule is on the subject of humility. Humility requires radical self-honesty, and a total acceptance of who we are with all our unchangeable past, gifts, strengths, weaknesses, successes, and failures. It requires that we surrender and learn to love those parts about ourselves that we think of as unlovable so that our capacity to love can widen. Humility is essential for an individual or a community to flourish because it guides us in having respectful and loving interactions with others. The humble is able to respect the dignity of every human being (even the particularly undignified politician) because the humble knows we all are in need of mercy daily. The humble knows that calling evil what it is, is an act of love, but we must do so without engaging in verbal or social violence. It is only through humility that we can ground ourselves in our true identity as people who are called to overcome evil with good.
The Benedictine call then, is to be a people willing to be passionately caring; a people willing to be a challenge and example to our society as a whole; a people willing to be in the world, but not of the world; a people willing to stand at the margins of society so that we can see what really is; a people willing to meet the pain and inner death that comes with seeing the real. We do it trusting that God is always able to bring new life out of all loss. We do it with the confidence that God, who shatters our expectations and surpasses our understanding, only desires for us to evolve into the fullness of the image in which we are made. Holy Father Benedict, pray for us. ¡Que así sea en el nombre del Padre y del Hijo y del Espíritu Santo! ~Amen+
References:
- Terrence G. Kardong, OSB, Benedict’s Rule: A Translation and Commentary (Liturgical Press, 2016)
- Jane Tomaine, St. Benedict’s Toolbox: The Nuts and Bolts of Everyday Benedictine Living, Revised Edition (Church Publishing, 2015)
- Norvene Vest, Preferring Christ: A Devotional Commentary on the Rule of St. Benedict (Church Publishing, 2004)
- Rule for Associates of Holy Cross, 1998
- Br. Randy Greeve, OHC, Sermon for the Feast of St. Peter and St. Paul- Holy Cross Monastery, June 29, 2018
- Br. Robert James Magliula, OHC, Sermon for the Feast of Saint Benedict- Holy Cross Monastery, July 11, 2015
- Br. Scott Wesley Borden, OHC, Sermon for the Feast of Saint Benedict- Holy Cross Monastery- July 11, 2012
- Br. Robert Leo Sevensky, OHC, Sermon for the Feast of Saint Benedict- Holy Cross Monastery, July 11, 2010
Friday, July 13, 2018
The Feast of St. Benedict: 79th General Convention Wednesday, July 11, 2018
To see the sermon in its fullness click here.
![]() |
Br. Aidan Owen, OHC |
That is the first question when you’re received as a postulant into a monastic community, and again when you receive the habit as a novice, and again when you make the three-fold Benedictine vow of obedience, stability, and conversion of life to the monastic way.
I do understand the impulse to defeat and vanquish evil. But such violent impulses are a part of evil’s grip on us. Although we can and must resist evil, we can never destroy it. Such is not within our power. Rather, we are called to bear witness to the one who can heal and integrate evil, to the one who can break evil open, and turn even the stoniest heart to flesh. We are called to point the way, through our own fleshy hearts, to the one who can transform and convert evil into good, so that, at the end, even Lucifer will bear God’s light again.
This question of desire drives the Benedictine Way, and, indeed the Christian Way. In his Rule for monks, Benedict gives a very simple and a very challenging answer: prefer nothing whatever to Christ.
You see, Benedict knew that, contrary to the image of monasticism in popular culture as a dour and serious life, the monastic life is really a love affair. For fifteen hundred years Benedict’s rule has provided a structure and context for pursuing the deepest longing of the heart for wholeness and unity in God. The Christian mystical tradition calls this search the pursuit of “purity of heart,” though we might more accurately describe it as “unity of heart,” which is to say the uniting of our entire being—body, mind, spirit, heart-centered in love on the one who is Love itself.
Monastic communities have always been spacious places in a crowded world. That space was certainly what drew me to Benedictine life. My whole life I had been driven by a longing so deep and powerful I couldn’t find a name for it. This longing was a burning secret at the center of my life. And every context in which I found myself was simply too small to hold it, or to hold me.
When I came to Holy Cross, where I’m now a monk, my intuition told me that I had finally found a place with enough space for that longing. It was certainly one of the few places I’d found where people nodded their heads knowingly when I mentioned this deep desire without a name.
I remember Andrew, in particular, an old Scottish monk with a wicked sense of humor, who would sit with me on my visits. He looked me right in the eyes, looked deep into my heart as only those who have lived the life of faith for decades can do, and he said, “I love you.” And as the tears streamed down my face, he said, in voice that understood, “Yes, it hurts to be loved.”
It does hurt to be loved. And it also hurts to love. Which is probably one reason so many of us avoid loving as fully, deeply, and freely as Jesus calls us to do. In this world that is so often small-minded, bitter, and violent—and increasingly so—we harden our hearts to keep them from breaking. But it is only the broken heart that has enough space to love as we ought. And it is only by breaking that our hearts turn from stone to flesh.
Monastic life participates, right here and now, in eternity. That is the secret to its spaciousness. In the hallowing of the everyday, Benedict’s rule points toward the holiness of the incarnate life in which, as he points out, the tools of the kitchen or the garden are as precious as the vessels of the altar. With eternity as its context, there is enough space for the whole of one’s life to emerge.
How different that process is from the process of education, identity-building, and success in contemporary society and even in the Church today. In Benedictine life, you don’t “become someone.” You don’t “make it.” Instead, over a lifetime, you surrender to God’s desire to stitch back together the fragments of your life, so that, what once seemed maimed, ugly, or shameful becomes, through the persistent and loving movement of God, beautiful, whole, and holy.
The Benedictine vision of the Christian life, in fact, asserts that it is precisely these parts of ourselves we would most like to deny that is the gateway to wholeness. We are not to jettison the shameful inner fragments, nor to exile or erase them as if we ever could. No, we are to allow God, in the context of our community life, to heal and transform those parts so that even they carry nourishing blood throughout the body.
If this movement toward wholeness is true on the individual level, how much truer it is for the community. For Benedictines, salvation is never individual. It is always communal. Each member of the monastic community is essential to the health of the whole body, each has his unique contribution to make. When a brother or sister is in need of a physician, the community provides one, which may include disciplinary action, but always with the goal not of punishing or shaming but of healing, transforming, and integrating that brother or sister back into the body of the community, where their flourishing is our flourishing.
None of us can or will be saved in isolation. It’s all of us or none of us. Because love is never finally satisfied. As any monk will tell you, the more your desire is fulfilled, the deeper that desire gets. It has no limit, because, ultimately, our desire is to be in total union with one who made and sustains us, the one whose Love is our true name and our true nature.
The more I live the monastic and the Christian life, the more fully I am convinced that no one and nothing is beyond this love. And that no matter how dark the times in which we live, God is still working, through each of us, to break the world’s heart open so that it can become a heart of flesh.
This is a challenging vision in the times in which we live. The forces of evil swirl around us and seem to tighten rather than loosen their hold. And yet, even—especially—when evil seems strongest, we are called all the more to allow our own hearts to break open, and to love without reservation.
As James Stephens so beautifully puts it in his poem “The Fullness of Time,”
There is nothing and no one who does not, ultimately, belong to God. There is no part of us, individually or collectively, that is beyond the reach of God’s healing and reconciling love. And if we follow the deep desires of our heart, if we prefer nothing whatever to Christ and allow Christ’s love to break and fill our hearts, who knows what kind of spacious sanctuary we may become?On a rusty iron thronePast the furthest star of spaceI saw Satan sit alone,Old and haggard was his face;For his work was done and heRested in eternity.And to him from out the sunCame his father and his friendSaying, now the work is doneEnmity is at an end:And he guided Satan toParadises that he knew.Gabriel without a frown,Uriel without a spear,Raphael came singing downWelcoming their ancient peer,And they seated him besideOne who had been crucified.
The Feast of St. Benedict- Wednesday, July 11, 2018
To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.
![]() |
Br. Scott Borden, OHC |
Brother Andrew used to preface statements with a qualifier of the following nature: "It may not have happened this way, but this is the truth." Of course, Andrew would smile and laugh as though he were joking, but he wasn't. If we are confined to the literal, then we are very deprived indeed. So, let's not be too bound to the literal as we look a bit at the life of Benedict...Of course, there is one point of solid evidence in the life of Benedict and that is the Rule of Benedict.
I'll happily acknowledge that I may not be impartial, but the Rule is surely one of the most important pieces in the history of monasticism, not just Western but Eastern Christianity. The influence of the rule on all expressions of Monasticism is profound. Just ask our Orthodox brothers and sisters at New Skete.
So, let's hear a chapter from the rule... Of the Porter of the Monastery: Inside near the gates of the monastery a cell is to be provided for a brother, who by reason of advanced age cannot wander far. Posted there, let him at all times close up the monastery behind those who leave and open it for those who are coming in, and announce arrivals to the abbot. During periods devoted to reading, he must see to it that the gates are locked. In a like manner, when the signal for the Divine Office has sounded he is to lock the gates and be present in the oratory... Those who know the Rule of Benedict will realize that I'm perpetuating a bit of a fraud... that is not the Rule of Benedict, but rather the Rule of the Master... Benedict's rule, it would seem, has an evil twin: The Rule of the Master.
The two rules share many starting points. Benedict addresses the porter of the monastery – an older brother is to be given a room near the entrance and his charge is to deal with those who come to the door. But how the porter deals with the those who comes to the door – there is the difference.
The Master's porter is a gate keeper. He is to keep folks out and make sure those allowed in are kept in line so as not to disturb the community. Benedict's porter is there to extend hospitality to the strangers at the door – to welcome them and offer them a blessing.
Time and again the two rules start in the same place – it’s the destinations that demonstrate the difference. Benedict focuses on a growing life of faith which then is shared with others, both with brothers and strangers. The Master focuses on keeping the brothers focused and free of distraction.
Was one rule based on the other? Who knows. Were both rules based on some older, lost tradition? Scholars wonder.
So, with the help of Br Andrew let me sort this out...It may not have happened exactly this way, but this is the truth...
Once upon a time a man named Benedict was called to lead a monastery that was in trouble... The abbot had died, and the community was a shambles...
The brothers knew they needed help and so they sought Benedict, a good and powerful leader, to get them back on track. Benedict dutifully assumed the position of Abbot and set about the work of rescuing this community. After all, this is what the community had called him to do.
It should, therefore, come as no surprise to anyone who knows anything about communities to learn that the brothers of the monastery responded to Benedict's loving correction by conspiring to kill Abbot Benedict. What else could they do?
They put poison in the wine for his Eucharistic Celebration and waited for Benedict to drink his own death. But God intervened. As Benedict prayed a blessing over the cup it shattered, the poison was spilled and Benedict was saved. We might wonder at the faithfulness of these brothers, but when it came to ridding themselves of Benedict they were devoted...
If the wine didn't do it, then it's on to the bread... poison is applied to the host for Benedict's celebration, but before he could eat the deadly loaf, a raven sweeps in and snatches it away. Birds – one. Community – zero.
So here is my theory, which I know to be true even if it didn't exactly happen this way... When Benedict assumed the position of Abbot at that troubled monastery, he attempted to enforce the Rule of the Master. The result, to say the least, was not life giving. But when God spared Benedict from attempted assassinations, he also put it in Benedict's mind to spare future generations from that terrible rule. And so, Benedict crafted his rule out of the dregs of the Rule of the Master.
Time and again The Rule of Benedict starts with the same chapter heading as the Rule of the Master, and time and again Benedict turns away from a stringent, precise, highly detailed answer to a generous and loving answer. How much food and drink should each brother have? The Master knows to the ounce. St. Benedict is more vague – each should have enough... but not too much... and if there is a shortage we may have to do with less... and if that is the case, we had better not complain...
The Master's rule calls us to stay within the boundaries. Benedict's rule calls us to live life to the Glory of God.
It is a difference of extreme importance – and one that has been part of the Christian enterprise since the time of Jesus, and part of the religious enterprise long before that.
From the very beginning of scripture, we see the pattern of these two rules emerging. Starting during the life of Moses, rules (the law) become important in the way faithful people live their lives. You really can't be faithful without some sort of rule. Some of the rules, the law, define how we live with each other, in community. And other rules, also the law, call us to live in a way that is pleasing to God – one is a code of justice and the other a code of holiness.
There lies a fundamental difference between the Rule of the Master and the Rule of St Benedict. The Master is defining a code of holiness. You do what the rule says because that is what is pleasing to God and anything else is wicked. Benedict is defining a code of just living. You live according to the rule because that brings about a community where all are treated as brothers and sisters – as equally loved children of God. Within Benedict's framework there are many times when discretion, creativity, even contradiction are essential.
Why on earth would anyone choose a rule like the Rule of the Master over a rule like the Rule of St Benedict? It is tempting to answer that no sensible, faithful person would, but that is not the truth.
The reality is that the Rule of the Master, while it may seem daunting in its minute detail, is simpler to follow. You don't have to figure out what is right or wrong, you just have to figure out what the rule says. Benedict is much messier. It demands that you think and that you adapt. For someone looking for a fixed and unchanging truth, the Rule of Benedict is an unappealing destination.
Yet Benedict's rule is fully concerned with our transformation of life. And it is in the messy, confusing, sometimes frustrating, even contradictory working out of life in community under a rule that our ways are converted – that we are transformed – that God's kingdom is built in our hearts.
The Master seeks to control and manage our will. Benedict seeks to harness our will.
If the rules of Benedict and the Master were available in Jesus' day, I dare say Jesus would have been enthusiastic about Benedict's rule while the Pharisees would have been far more enamored of the Master's rule. Jesus is always interested in justice – especially justice for the weak, the powerless, the oppressed. The Pharisees are interested in absolute answers and sound doctrine.
We tend to overlook that Jesus was a trouble making revolutionary who was interested in disturbing the status quo – because the status quo, now as much as then, is designed to give all the advantage to the rich and powerful. Following Jesus meant then, and still means today, standing against the culture and disrespecting some rules.
We may not think of Benedict as particularly revolutionary, but think what it would mean if the world as it is now were transformed into the community Benedict has in mind... Benedict, through his holy and inspired rule, has given us a plan for conversion of our ways of life to the monastic way – that is a plan not for safety, not for comfort, but for the revolutionary act of building God's Kingdom.