Showing posts with label Proper 21. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proper 21. Show all posts

Sunday, September 25, 2022

Proper 21 C - September 25, 2022

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Aidan Owen, OHC

Pentecost, Proper 21 C - September 25, 2022




In the name of the One God, who is Lover, Beloved, and Love Overflowing.


It’s so easy to feel smug when we read Jesus’ parables. We’ve read them so often, heard so many sermons on them, that it’s easy to think we’ve got them—and by extension Jesus—figured out. Because of this tendency we normally see ourselves in the outcasts in the stories, never as their persecutors. We’re always Israel, never Egypt, always the publican, never the pharisee. 


Our smugness betrays us, however. Jesus tells stories like those we’ve been hearing the last many weeks to confuse us and untangle the knots of our complacency and stubborn self-regard. As soon as we think we’ve figured out a parable, it shoots out of our hands, falls between our feet, and trips us. 

 

This morning’s story of the rich man and Lazarus is just such a story. On it’s surface it’s rather simple. There’s a callous rich man who feasts all day in his mansion while a beggar starves on his doorstep. He’s very wicked, but his wickedness primarily lies in his self-absorption. It’s not that he bears Lazarus any ill will. He’s just so concerned with his own comfort that he doesn’t even see Lazarus. Even when he ends up in hades being tormented by fire, he treats Lazarus as a tool—someone who can either give him water or warn his brothers for him. Never does he see or acknowledge Lazarus as a child of God. 

 

Fortunately for us, our God is a righteous and just God. Lazarus, who suffered while he was alive, gets to recline at the eternal banquet against the bosom of Abraham. Hopefully the dogs are there, too, being fed the choicest of kibble. Not only does Lazarus get the care he never received on earth, not only does the rich man get to burn for the rest of time, but—and this is the best part—Abraham tells off the rich man for his negligence and self-absorption. It’s a classic tale of the reversal of fortune and the delicious comeuppance that those ignorant rich folks get when we all get to heaven. 

 

You see, surely, how tempting that reading is, how brilliant Jesus’ rhetorical skill is to draw us in and make us identify with the poor man at the gates over against the callous rich guy. Jesus had it before Hollywood. But there’s our smugness again. There’s our hypocritical self-righteousness. There are our callous, unforgiving hearts on full display. 

 

More than Lazarus or the rich man or Abraham, though, I find myself fixated on the chasm. It’s the part of the story that makes no sense to me. One translation I read described it as “a large chasm filled with sharp stones.” It’s something of a moat or gate, some barrier that is fixed in place, unmoving and unmoveable. It must be quite something if even Abraham cannot get past it. And just like the walls around the rich man’s house, this chasm keeps Lazarus and the rich man separated for all eternity. No reconciliation. No forgiveness. No chance of conversion or change or healing. Justice, perhaps, but no mercy. 

 

To the extent that we find ourselves caught up in anger, fear, self-justification, and the desire for revenge, this chasm can’t but remain fixed in place, both in the parable and in our world. Every time we hear this story and think, Glad that rich guy got what was coming to him, we pile another sharp stone in the ditch. We have to see this dimension of the story if our hearts are ever to soften. We have to repent of our heard-heartedness, if we are ever to help to reconcile and heal the jagged-edged divisions in our world. We have to learn to see the chasm with dismay, to mourn its seeming fixity with tears of compunction. 

 

Just after the story of Lazarus and the rich man, Jesus says to his disciples “If another disciple sins, you must rebuke the offender, and if there is repentance, you must forgive. And if the same person sins against you seven times a day, and turns back to you seven times and says, “I repent”, you must forgive.’ This teaching is so difficult that the disciples immediately respond, “Lord, increase our faith!” 

 

It can’t be an accident that Jesus teaches about the demands of forgiveness immediately after telling a story about these seemingly irreconcilable men. True, the rich man never expresses contrition for ignoring the poor man at his gate. But then, Lazarus never has the chance to speak, either. Perhaps it’s naïve, but I wonder, if the two could sit down at the banquet together, what new world might come into being between them? 

 

But, of course, there’s that terrible chasm and its sharp stones between them. As I prayed about that chasm, I kept wondering, where is Jesus in all this mess? And then I knew. Jesus is the bridge over the chasm. Jesus, pouring out his life and his love on the Cross, bridges the gap that cannot be bridged. He makes a way where there is no way. He, who broke open the gates of hell and freed the souls trapped in their torment, lays down his tender body over the sharp stones of our hard and unbelieving hearts so that we, too, can be reconciled to God and one another, so that we can be made whole. 

 

We who follow Jesus know that there is no chasm that cannot be crossed. We know that the Cross of Christ is the bridge over which we walk from this life, with all its brokenness and separation, to the heavenly banquet. I have to believe that Lazarus and the rich man can also walk across that bridge, can finally look into one another’s eyes, clasp one another’s hands, and say to one another, “brother, welcome home.” 

 

In the world in which we live, this kind of reconciliation seems naïve, the stuff of kids’ imaginings. To the extent that that is true for us, we can join the disciples in praying, “Lord, increase our faith!” The God who makes a way out of no way, can bring even you and me to the place of belief and, through that belief, to the place of surrender and wholeness in Christ. 

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Proper 21 B - September 26, 2021

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Bernard Delcourt, OHC

Proper 21 B - Sunday, September 26, 2021



In the name of God, the Lover, the Beloved and the Love everflowing.

I’ll focus on our passage from the epistle of James today. These are the last verses of the epistle. James concludes his letter by encouraging his readers to pray in all situations.

In this, he echoes the apostle Paul in his epistle to the Ephesians (6:18a): “Pray in the Spirit at all times in every prayer and supplication.”

James, the author of this morning’s epistle is thought to be James, the brother of Jesus. Did he learn about prayer from his Brother? Or did he learn more about prayer from his Brother’s disciples? 

In any case, he was a major leader of the Jesus-following Jews of Jerusalem, a proto-Christian community. And he encouraged them to pray in all circumstances.

James is the one best known for writing in this same epistle (James 2:17): “faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.”

It would appear that James counts prayer as one of those good works he enjoins us to do to strengthen our faith.

The brother of Jesus tells us to pray whether we are up or down; whether we are suffering or cheerful. In both instances, it can be easy to be all involved in our feelings and forget to pray. 

Do we remember to ask for fortitude, wisdom and healing when we suffer? Do we remember to say or sing “thank you, God!” when we have had happy moments.

When we are sick, do we stick to what the medical authorities prescribe? Or do we also ask fellow believers to pray for our healing? As the new Director of Associates, I notice I get those requests if I elicit them but rarely spontaneously. Why know a monk, if you don’t dare ask him to pray for you?

Do we dare to have some of our fellow believers visit us when we are not at our best? Do we invite them to bring us comfort and pray with us, over us? 

How often do parish priests find out, after the fact, that a parishioner was hospitalized and did not want to bother her with a request for a pastoral visit? 

She would probably have been glad to bring some chrism (a blessed mixture of oil and balsam) to anoint her sick parishioner in the name of the Lord. 

James invites us to not let opportunities to pray or be prayed for pass us by.

“The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up” he writes. We hear a verse like that and don’t believe it because as modern folks, we are looking solely for the relief of the physical symptoms and the eradication of the physical cause of illness. 

Those two healing outcomes are very good indeed. But healing is much more than that. It also involves the restoration of wholeness and belonging. And prayers are part of the pharmacy for that.

James also advises us to unburden ourselves of our sin by confessing it to other members of the community of faith and prayer. What he suggests here is mutual. I confess my sins to you and you confess yours to me. 

And the important part is that we commit ourselves to pray for one another. And that is also where an important healing occurs. 

We recognize that we are both sinners and righteous ones at the same time. None of us is perfect and we are all in need of mercy; each other’s mercy and God’s mercy.

James tells us the prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective. That is true regardless of whether you get to observe the effects of your prayer or not. Sometimes, God gives us the grace of seeing how we have been an instrument of divine grace. But most often, God doesn’t bother. We need to trust in God’s grace regardless of measurable effects of our prayer. After all, this is not about us and our very own superpowers, is it?

So this coming week, see if you can remember to pray your life and pray the lives of your fellow creatures more often. Happy, sad, healthy, sick, culpable or innocent; those are all states that bear praying about.

Beloved Lord, help us to pray as you would have us pray.
Beloved Creator, help us to be instruments of your grace to all your creatures.

Amen

Sunday, September 27, 2020

Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost - Proper 21 A - September 27, 2020

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Bernard Delcourt, OHC



In today’s passage, Jesus doesn’t make any more friends amongst the chief priests and elders of the temple. The passage ends up with an explicit insult to make sure they get it. 

If he were here today, would he address us differently? Would he tell us monks and priests, “Truly I tell you, the payday lenders and the drug dealers are going into the kingdom of God ahead of you?” This gives us a sense of how stinging was the rebuke he addressed to those who were deemed to live virtuous lives.

What Jesus wants them and us to hear and consider is a simple message. Our actions show our real intent. They speak more eloquently of our faithfulness than our statements, no matter how well worded and sincere they may be.

Our virtue and authority may be favorably assessed by ourselves and others. But are our actions expressing that virtue? Our perceived virtue and authority are irrelevant to how well we love God and neighbor. People’s and our own assessments of our virtue and authority do not put us above those most vilified by the self-righteous.

*****

Shortly before the encounter we heard about in today’s gospel, Jesus entered Jerusalem in triumph. Later, he proceeded to cleanse the temple. Those are two recent things the chief priests and the elders of the people object to. 

Under what authority does Jesus allow himself to do these things, they want to know? More to the point, they are quite sure he does not have the authority to do these things and they want to expose him.

The authorities ask Jesus: “By what authority are you doing these things, and who gave you this authority?”  They are hoping that Jesus will incriminate himself by his answer.  

They expect him to either say “Under my own authority” or “Under God’s authority.” Either of those answers would be deemed sacrilegious (though actually correct as we know from our point of view).

But Jesus sees through their machinations and knows better than to answer directly. Instead he meets the authorities’ challenge with a riposte. 

He asks the chief priests and the elders a question that he knows they will find very difficult to answer in front of the crowd of onlookers. “Did the baptism of John come from heaven, or was it of human origin?”

After discussions, the authorities find it impossible to answer the question without losing face. And as it is, they lose face anyway in admitting that they can’t even answer a straightforward question. 

Jesus’ question has established that He has more authority than the chief priests and the elders. He has also established that John the Baptist was a mighty prophet whose authority the religious elite rebuffed.

It is an amazing demonstration of Jesus’ insight into people’s intents and motivations, his capacity to subvert the establishment, not to mention his rhetorical virtuosity.

*****

But Jesus is not done with his demonstration of the religious authorities’ illegitimacy. Next he tells a parable that illustrates where they stand in relationship to God.

It is the parable of two sons who respond to their father and how their words and acts differ.

The first son sounds bad but does the right thing in the end. The second son sounds good at first but doesn’t do what he says. The first son ultimately did the will of his father. The second son sounded faithful but then did not act in accordance with his words. Which son did actually do the will of his father Jesus asks? The first one.

The first son ends up being more faithful to his father than the second one. This parable imparts that in the end, turning back to God, repenting, and doing God’s will is more important than sounding faithful without showing the fruits of faith.

The parable is an indictment of the religious authorities who say the right things but then don’t act according to what they say.

******

Jesus concludes by saying that the tax collectors and the prostitutes who repented and did what John the Baptist preached will precede the chief priests and the elders in the Kingdom of God. 

But even after they witnessed the repentance of sinners, the authorities did not believe in John. And even after seeing all the signs that Jesus has done, neither do they believe in Him.

It is a shocking statement, tax collectors and prostitutes were deemed to be among the worst possible sinners there were. The religious authorities are utterly shamed by the end of this parable. No wonder they then conspire to get rid of this inconvenient Galilean prophet.

******

So where does this gospel passage leave us? Do we profess to live the Golden Rule and the Beatitudes in our lives? Do we talk a good talk about our religious obligations?

What about our actions? Are they aligned with our profession of faith? Do we try to dilute the strength of Jesus’ teachings or do we let their radicality shake us into radical living? Do we turn to Christ with our acts more than our words? What parts of our lives remain to be converted into Christ-following actions?

And how is all that playing out in our personal, communal and national lives? Who are the converted tax collectors and prostitutes we should emulate in today’s society? Let us think of those we look down on. Let us wonder how they may witness to God’s will more actually than we currently do.

Let’s be doers of Jesus’ teachings more than loudspeakers. As a saying attributed to St Francis goes: “Preach Jesus, and if necessary use words.”

Amen.

Sunday, October 7, 2018

Proper 22, Year B: Sunday, October 7, 2018

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Bernard Delcourt, OHC
Proper 21- Sunday, October 7, 2018

To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.

Br. Bernard Delcourt, OHC 
I’ll focus on the first pericope of today’s gospel passage. The one that deals with divorce, or is that what it deals with? Jesus talks about what is permissible under Mosaic law and what is intended for the Kingdom of God. What is intended for Kingdom-living is God-loving, life-giving relationships among humans.

But first, the Good News. We are all God’s Beloved regardless of our marital status or sexual orientation. And the Episcopal Church welcomes all of us regardless of the same. 

And the Table of the Lord is open to all baptized Christians here regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. And if you are not baptized yet, let’s talk about that as soon as possible after the service. The context of the discussion of divorce and adultery in today’s passage is one of many in the Gospels in which various authorities try to trap Jesus by asking him a question that they know has no good answer.

I believe The Episcopal Church achieves both appropriate pastoral care to its divorced and remarried members and, faithfulness to the will of God for right relationship amongst lovers. In discerning the will of God through this pericope on divorce, it is important to consider the context in which Jesus made his comments on divorce. And that context is that of a very patriarchal society. In Jesus´ time, marriage was mostly an economic transaction between two families in an economy where honor was the highest valued commodity.


The married woman, for all intents and purposes, became a second-class member in her husband´s family. At least until she produced a male heir to her husband. At that point, her son eventually became her best chance of protection against neglect or abuse by her in-laws.


On the other hand, a married man could pretty much treat his wife as he pleased. He could use the services of prostitutes without affecting the honor of his wife (which in any case was of very low concern to the whole social group they belonged to). If the married man committed adultery with a married woman, the husband of that woman was considered the injured party, not the wife of the adulterous husband. 
Married women were entirely dependent on the honor “bank account” of their husband and/or their son’s for their own honor. Married women were also entirely dependent on these relatives for the provision of their needs.

Despite verse 12 in our passage that has Jesus say ¨and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery,¨ only men could divorce their wife in the Israelite society of his day, not the other way round. 
Verse 12 has Jesus address the situation of Hellenized Jesus groups in the time of Mark´s redaction. Non-Jewish women who joined the Jesus movement at that time were free to initiate divorce under the civil law.

In Jesus´ lifetime, divorce amongst Israelites was only available to men. You might think: “well, what about Herodias?” Herodias was a high-ranking woman in the royal family. She divorced Herod Philip II to marry his brother Herod Antipas, the ruler of Galilee. Herodias’ divorce and remarriage were considered by most as abhorrent abnormalities.


Ordinary women who were divorced for any reason were in great danger of not being taken back by their father´s family.  They were easily perceived as having sullied the honor of their biological family by failing to satisfy their ex-husband and his family. In such cases, many divorced women had to resort to begging or prostitution to survive.


The very partriarchal society in which Jesus lived and ministered treated women as property that accrued (or decreased) honor for their responsible males. Some refer to the kind of marriage that was then available as “chattel marriage.”


The marriage and divorce landscape that Jesus addresses is very different from marriage and divorce in our contemporary society. And this is not to say that patriarchy no longer applies in our society. As a multitude of events in the last year have only made too clear, patriarchy is still an active structure in our society.


So Jesus engages his audience to go beyond the letter of the law in order to live the kind of loving relationships the Kingdom of God ushers in. Divorce under the law remains permissible under the law. Jesus doesn’t repudiate the law as he himself insisted upon. 
But Jesus engages his audience to go well beyond the law. What is permissible under the law? The Pharisees who ask him about divorce already know the answer to that.

What is intended in the Kingdom of God? God intends human lovers to have non-exploitative, supportive and nurturing relationships as a reflection of God’s care and concern for all. In the process,  we note that Jesus advocates greater social safety and well-being for women in the framework of his day’s family institutions.


I use gender-neutral terms to refer to marriage because I do believe that The Episcopal Church also achieves both appropriate pastoral care to its same-gendered couples and faithfulness to the will of God for right relationship amongst lovers.


True, Jesus does not address LGBT relationships in the pericope we are reflecting upon. The kind of loving and committed LGBT relationships we now know did not exist in his time. But I believe Jesus’ intent for right relationship amongst lovers extends to all-gendered love relationships.
 
In anglican tradition, marriage achieves three goals. First, it offers companionship and covenantal union between two humans. Second, it provides a context for procreation and the raising of children. Finally, it provides a legitimate outlet for sexual desire. Hopefully, all this is achieved on a foundation of mutual respect and love. I believe we do well to provide the benefits of marriage to all who desire them and love each other regardless of gender.


All this being said, I also believe that Jesus’ intent for the Kingdom of God means married couples should avoid a frivolous divorce. Sometimes, we need to stay the course, forgive and try again. It’s one of the things that we monks undertake with our vow of stability.


Also, Jesus teaches us that sexual or romantic desire for a third party should not be the reason to seek divorce. In such cases, we should seek forgiveness and reconciliation.


But divorce can be contemplated when injury (moral or physical) has durably eclipsed mutual respect and love between the spouses. There is no reason to endorse on-going abuse in any human relationship.


Marriage can work as a metaphor of the relationship between humans and God. But when the relationship has deteriorated beyond repair, separation and divorce can offer each spouse new chances for integrity to build up Kingdom-of-God relationships.


One of the many things I love in this Episcopal Church of ours is that all are welcome to the table of the Lord; singles, married folks, divorced folks, remarried folks, whatever their sexual orientation may be. With the grace of God, we refrain from judging each other on our differences.


God of love, teach us to be in right relationship with each other, in marriage or outside marriage. Help us be loving to all parties to a divorce or a remarriage. And help us nurture marriages that are fruitful in love and radiate your love to those who surround them.
Amen.

Sunday, September 30, 2018

Proper 21, Year B: Sunday, September 30, 2018

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY
Br. Josép R. Martínez-Cubero, OHC
Proper 21- Sunday, September 30, 2018


To hear the sermon in its fullness click here.


Br. Josép Martínez-Cubero, OHC 
I love this gospel lesson! We have exorcists, demons, drowning, amputations, and hell! And I love Jesus in this passage. Talk about fully human! You can tell he is dealing with disciples who are very young, and it appears he has had it with them not getting it!

 “Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him because he was not following us.” (One wonders what they were expecting Jesus’ response to be?) This happens almost immediately after Jesus rebuked their earlier arguments about which of them is the greatest. 

It seems that all Jesus’ rebuke did was to encourage them to stop competing with each other so that they could compete together against those outside the group.
 
This particular section of Mark’s Gospel reflects some conflicts between early Christian communities. Mark frames this part of his narrative to address some of the problems his community is having with other Christians. The early Christian church wasn’t all united in their beliefs… (Hmm) Sometimes Christians clashed with each other… (Hmm!) Occasionally, Christians criticized one another very harshly over differences in practice… (Hmmm, sounds familiar?) Mark’s audience would have recognized themselves in the disciples' finger-pointing, and their sense of competition over who can use Jesus' name, who is right, and who has authority.
 
For Mark, Christian identity is defined, not by finger-pointing other Christians, and not by taking the role of victim when persecuted or criticized in order to excuse payback, and punishment. Instead, Christian community is to be defined by responding to Jesus’ call to care for the vulnerable, to welcome the stranger, and to avoid those things that are destructive to self, neighbor, and community. In this is rooted our identity as Jesus’ disciples, to love God and neighbor. Our identity as people of God is not something we attain, but something we receive as a gift. We are called to live in gratitude as the blessed people of God, and we are to point people toward God through our example.
 
Calling evil what evil is, is an act of love. Demonizing is not. Judgment belongs not to us but to God. Finger-pointing will not get far with Jesus. While the disciples are eager to bring judgment on the outsider who is acting in Jesus' name, Jesus wants the disciples to pay attention instead to their own behavior and warns them that they are the ones in danger of doing harm. It's as though Jesus says, "The problem is not the folks outside our group. Don't worry about them. Look at yourselves. How are you getting in the way of the gospel? How are you a stumbling block?" It is better to cut off your hand, your foot or pull out your eye if it’s causing you to stumble than to go to hell.
 
A very important point here is that the Greek term translated as hell is really "Gehenna," the Valley of Hinnom.  This is the place where the population of Israel burned its trash. The story is that so much trash was burned there that the fires never seem to go out. But before that, it was the valley where the dead soldiers used to be piled up during war, and where the bodies of executed criminals were disposed of. It was also the place where centuries before Jesus, child sacrifices were performed by the followers of the Canaanite god Moloch. (Jeremiah 7)
 
So, Jesus here is not talking about Dante’s Inferno. He is referring to the way we shut off ourselves from God’s Reign here on earth when we alienate ourselves from God and one another or when we see nothing but threats from outside our community, threats from people outside our control, threats we want to stop. As many of us saw on Thursday with the Kavanaugh/Ford Hearings, this kind of hell happens in our public discourse. It also happens when we scapegoat Muslims, foreigners, people of color, LGBTQ people, democrats, republicans, and the list goes on. We can hear it in our communities when we blame what’s wrong in our cities and towns on racial or ethnic or religious differences. Every time we draw a line between others and ourselves we will find Jesus on the other side. Jesus is always with the outsiders. The poem by Edwin Markham goes like this:
 
He drew a circle that shut me out —Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout.But Love and I had the wit to win:We drew a circle that took him in!
 
Jesus warns that the tendency to scapegoat others, and to blame others, and to name the sins of others is the very path the leads to Gehenna- the place where the casualties of our scapegoating pile-up, the place that symbolizes the worst that humans choose to do to one another. I’m not convinced it is a place in the afterlife. If there was really an eternal realm where demons executed grim punishment on people for their sins, hell would be over-flowing with people and heaven would be empty. As Lutheran pastor Nadia Boltz-Weber puts it, “We are all saints and sinners.” The Scriptures make very clear that God loves the whole world and seeks to restore everyone to right relationship. In the fullness of time, instead of condemning us to hell, God will love the hell out of us. Que así sea en el nombre del Padre, del Hijo y del Espíritu Santo. ~Amen+

 
References:


  1. David L. Bartlett and Barbara Brown Taylor (General Editors), Feasting on the Word, Year B Volume 4 (Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville, KY 2011)
  2. Bruce J. Malina, Richard L. Rohrbaugh, Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels (Fortress Press, Second Edition, 2003
  3. Edwin Marham, Outwitted (Poem)