Sunday, December 29, 2024

The First Sunday after Christmas Day, December 29, 2024

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Adam McCoy
The First Sunday after Christmas Day, December 29, 2024
 

Click here for an audio of the sermon

 

I seem to remember years ago how daring it was in a Christmas sermon to point out the revolution promised by the nativity story. Instead of painting a picture of conventionally comforting images, our brave preacher would try to shock us all:  The Angel promising that the holy child will by social standards seem  illegitimate; a very young but by no means unaware Mary saying Yes to all that may imply for her future; and her Magnificat: This is how the world will be set right, by turning everything upside down.  

The royal heir of David, born in David’s city, but excluded from even the most elementary human hospitality. The poverty of Mary and Joseph - their seeming lack of relatives and resources landing them away in the manger, no crib for a bed.  What a counter-intuitive way for the King of Kings to make his entrance!  And yet this is the narrative form in Matthew and Luke of God’s chosen entrance into his world. Every Christmas we take heart that God’s transforming work will start to be done in a small, obscure place by people of seemingly no account.  The real transformation is a revolution, replacing the rich with the poor, the powerful with the weak, the noble with the humble.

John doesn’t even hint at a nativity scene.  No angel, no shepherds, no magi, no meeting with Elizabeth, no Bethlehem, no manger, in fact, no Mary and no Joseph.  John starts his story at the top: Echoing Genesis he writes: In the beginning.... Beresit.... En arche....  The term John uses here, arche, means not simply the beginning of something in time, but also that which gives each thing its essential being: its structure, its innate properties.  The Word, the Logos, is not just a particular vocabulary item but is its underlying discoverable, communicable, rational pattern.

John seems to say, This is really how things have been, are, and always will be.  This is where the world really came from.  This is what it really is.  This is where it really is going, Because the Logos is its origin, its structure.  The Incarnation brings the Word itself into our lives, into our world, and in that process, changes everything.

This story, John implies, is going to tell us about reality.  Not the beginning of a social revolution, but a revolution in how reality itself is perceived.  In a world whose pagan culture, whose religious ideology, is fixed on beings, natural, animal and human qualities writ large and sculpted into believable images, this story will dethrone and remove every idol.  John sends us to what seems to be an empty room, to a holy of holies, where the One who is above all and through all and in all is found in quiet silence and in waiting.  And there we wait for the Word.  And we find that Word in a human person, the Word made flesh.  Jesus.

In the Beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God.  He was in the beginning with God.  All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being.

In learning this, in knowing this, in believing this, something entirely new is brought into our world.  No longer is the world complete in itself, self-explanatory.  Nothing in the world has its being in itself.  Nothing has power in its own essence.  Because everything is made by and through the Word, everything is contingent on the Word.  The strange thing is that this contingency sets human knowledge free: We need no longer be captive to things, or captive to our own images of truth as though they themselves are complete and eternal, but we are free to change our understandings of them as our minds lead us, as we stand secure in the knowledge that the Word alone is all truth.  The rest can change, will change, will always change, but our firm foundation is in holding fast to the Word who has created and sustains all that is, not holding fast to our already existing understandings.

Every act of greater understanding brings us closer to the Word.  The search for knowledge is a search for the Word, and that search is holy.  And that search is never, can never be, finished.  Just when we think we “know” all there is to know about something, something new appears.  The world brought into being by the Word is alive with the creating act of God and we are continually invited by the creative Word into a process of discovery.  

And like the up-from-the-bottom birth of the savior, this too is a revolution.  The Incarnation of the Word opens our eyes, opens our minds to understand that the material reality we live in is not itself ultimate, that there is another referent, a different stance which allows us to step aside and become observers, analysts, theorizers, communicators with each other, of a material reality whose essential nature we are always in the process of discovering.  Not that it itself changes, but that our understanding, always striving to come closer to the Logos in its arche, its beginning, is never complete for us.  Our journey is alive to the Word as long as we choose to be open to it. To the person who follows the Word, the world is alive.

When we think we have a grip on something, we discover it is actually something else.  For thousands of years the experts were sure that the heavens were a shell surrounding us and the stars were holes where the light came in; they were sure that human personality is determined by the four humors; they thought diseases were caused by nonphysical entities, sometimes demonic. They were wrong.  What are our present day confident but actually contingent certainties?

This happens in history.  For millennia we have depended on written sources, and when they are lacking, on narrative supposition, for knowledge of our past. These sources give us stories but rarely cooperate in giving us truth.  But something strange has begun to happen.   Careful archaeology, carbon 14,plant pollen, tree rings, long-buried disease bacilli, pandemic eruption tracings, DNA and its every-increasing and fascinating applications, have moved many historical narratives out of the realm of fable and attached them to knowledge.  Who knew that DNA would show that a human population could be stable, rooted in one place for 10,000 years, when DNA proved that Adrian Targett, a teacher in Somerset, England, was a direct descendant of the so-called “Cheddar Man”, a local skeleton which survived for ten millennia?  The imagined story becomes a fact: Their people came and stayed.

What has changed and is changing our perceptions of reality?  The growing understanding that John is right: that the Word is at the beginning of all things and defines their essential structures, that the Word is the essence of what is knowable and rational, and that we are invited to enter into its light, to follow its sacred and holy path to knowledge, to uncover it and theorize about it and test it and communicate it, as best we can.  

Knowledge is holy.  The pursuit of knowledge is holy.  Study is holy.  Libraries are holy.   Every act of the increase of knowledge brings us nearer to the Word who created the world and for that reason is holy.  The entrance into the world of this Word is the other revolution of the Incarnation.

But of course, for John, the Word, the creative, sustaining, pattern-giving Logos, is not an idea, but a person.  Jesus of Nazareth is the Word incarnate.  It is he who brings light into a dark  world.  It is he, and all he embodies, who makes possible our choice to follow these  revolutionary paths to greater and greater understandings of what is real, bringing us into the truth of our own lives and into the truth of the world itself.  Or not.

So it might be interesting to pay attention to what Jesus says.  It would seem that when Jesus speaks, the Logos itself is speaking, opening the mind of God to us.  

And so I find the very first words Jesus speaks in the Gospel of John interesting.  In the first thing he says in John’s gospel, Jesus asks two of John’s disciples who are following after him, “What are you seeking?”  A question which had a specific setting at the time, but which echoes again and again, and will open infinite worlds to us if we hear it asking us:  What are we seeking?

Wednesday, December 25, 2024

The Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ - December 25, 2024

Holy Cross Monastery, West Park, NY

Br. Scott Wesley Borden

The Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ, December 25, 2024

Christmas seems like one of those holy days that is filled with timeless traditions that have roots going all the way back to a stable in Bethlehem. We assume that Christmas has been at the center of the Christian Story since there has been a Christian Story. That is not entirely wrong, but it's not entirely correct. 

In scripture we have two versions of the birth of Jesus: Matthew and Luke. These days we have the two stories so thoroughly intertwined that we don’t much notice the differences, but they are very different stories. In Matthew, Jesus is born at home in Bethlehem. According to Luke, Mary and Joseph have made a difficult journey from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem where Jesus is born in a stable because the no vacancy sign is on at the inn 

Luke gives us shepherds. We supply the sheep, and we imagine them into lovely, homey scenes around the manger. Matthew gives us Magimysterious wise persons of an unknown quantity who bring gold, frankincense, and myrrh; A homicidal Herod killing all the young boys in Bethlehem, an escape to Egypt for Jesus and his parents, and from there they go back to Nazareth, not Bethlehem... 

In both stories Jesus is born in Bethlehem and in both stories, Jesus grows up in Nazareth. Mary is a virgin, and Joseph is not Jesus’ father in either story... That's about where the common details end... These stories tell us essential things, but they do not tell us the same things. Luke and Matthew are both subversive and the stories they tell us are pretty dark. Part of our challenge in keeping Christmas is to get past the sweetness and sentimentality that we bring. The Christmas Story, and for that matter the entire Gospel, is not sweet nor is it sentimental... Jesus is revolutionary and following Jesus means being part of the revolution  

Christmas, more than any other sacred day in the Christian Calendar, for me at least, is defined by the music. That makes it the best of holy days... for me. From hymns to anthems and motets, from African American spirituals to Celtic folk songs, from Carols to the soundtrack of our shopping malls, Christmas rules the music charts. You will not convince me otherwise. Sure, Easter is important and it, too, has some excellent music, but the music of Christmas is without equal – in my humble opinion 

However, the music of Christmas is not particularly ancient. It took the early church about four centuries to arrive at an agreed time for the keeping of Christmas and a few centuries after that to begin developing a catalogue of Christmas music. 

Christmas existed within the church year in a sort of second tier of holy days until the Reformation. Some of the currents in the Reformation were OK with Christmas – mainly Luther and his pals. Others rejected Christmas as a feast with no proper scriptural basisthink of Calvin and his companions. Our Anglican forebears, as they often did, stood with their feet firmly in both camps. Still, much of the keeping of Christmas took place outside of Church, with things such as madrigals giving Christmas its flavor. 

Closer to home, those Pilgrim forebears of ours, who gave us Thanksgiving, gave us absolutely no Christmas. In 1659 the Massachusetts Bay Colony officially outlawed Christmas (they could do that in those days), and it remained illegal for more than two decades. Their Puritan forbears in England had outlawed the keeping of Christmas in the 1640s. Even once the ban was repealed it took a while for Christmas to come in out of the cold. 

Meanwhile, the Quakers in Pennsylvania did not ban Christmas, they just didn’t keep it. They held that every day was a holy day. Every day was a good day to remember that Jesus came to bring salvation. It is hard to argue with that 

In New York the Dutch did keep Christmas. Perhaps due to the commercial drive of the Dutch West India Company, who founded and ran the colony of New Amsterdam as agents for the Dutch government, Christmas began to take on commercial significance – which is still prominent to say the least.   

The Calvinist Dutch Reformed Church may not have loved the idea, but they had long since learned that you don’t mess with the Dutch West India Company... 

Other colonies in the US did not have the Pilgrim/Puritan heritage of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and so tended to keep Christmas as the English did, with food and family gathered. Did they go to Church? Maybe. They were just as likely to go Caroling with friends and family.  

Our Roman Catholic brothers and sisters were required to attend Mass for Christmas, but they were mostly still in Europe... the waves of Catholic immigration from Italy and Ireland were in the future.  

Christmas, for much of Christian history, was not the big deal that it is now. Some reviled the feast, including many of deep and abiding faith. Others were devoted to the feast, including many of deep and abiding faith... 

In the 18th Century, the love-hate relationship with Christmas transformed into a friendlier relationship. Services of lessons and carols began to appear. And the institution of Midnight Eucharist on Christmas eve began to appear meaning that people could go to church and still have Christmas as a mostly family-centered day, which is what it had largely become. 

In the 19th Century two big things changed our approach to Christmas. One of those big things was Washington Irving, the writer more or less local to this area. The other was Charles Dickens... another writer... Dickens was a generation younger than Irving and Irving exerted great influence on the young Dickens.  

When Irving penned his Sketchbook of Geofrey Crayona sort of New Yorker’s view of English Christmas, it was a sensation, especially in England. Among other things, Irving had a very high view of St Nicholas and is probably most responsible for our enduring love affair with Santa Claus. Irving helped found the Saint Nicholas Society of the City of New York which is still a thing. 

Irving saw Christmas not only as a pleasant indulgence, but a spiritual necessity. According to Irving, “He who can turn churlishly away from contemplating the felicity of his fellow beings wants the genial and social sympathies which constitute the charm of a merry Christmas.” Sounds a lot like something Dickens would say... 

A recent movie about the life of Charles Dickens describes him as the man who invented Christmas. It may be a bit of hyperbole but also has some truth. In his beloved story A Christmas Carol, Dickens picks up where Irving left off. And while Mathew and Luke may be a bit austere in their telling of the Christmas story, Dickens more than makes up for that.  

Dickens describes in beautiful detail how the power of Christmas can transform even a dreadful, selfish person like Ebenezer Scrooge. This redemptive story of Christmas repeats in our popular culture in stories like How the Grinch Stole Christmas, It's a Wonderful Life, and Home Alone to name a few.  

Conspicuously absent from these stories is any significant place for the Church... The possible exception might be Charlie Brown’s Christmas which does conclude with Linus reading from Luke’s Gospel, but not in church... Even in A Christmas Carol, only Bob Cratchit and Tiny Tim are reported to go to church.  

So here is the challenge on this lovely Christmas day: How do we, the church of our time, relate to Christmas? Fellowship and family are a good start – and we are on our way to these. Songs of prayer and praise are wonderful as well – clear echoes of the Shepherds as they sing Glory to God in the highest... 

But I think the real work for those Shepherds is when they stop singing and return to their fields with the conviction to make peace on earth – as in Glory to God in the highest, and on Earth, peace.  

Jesus doesn’t call us to think good thoughts about peace from the manger. Peace does not make itself. George MacLeod, founder of the Iona Community, defined heresy as praying for something without working for it. 

In this glorious celebration of Christmas, we get a glimpse, a foretaste of what God’s Kingdom might be like. This glimpse, this foretaste, fills us with love and, as Fr Huntington tells us, Love Must Act. We are not given a glimpse of God’s Kingdom as a private reward. We have an obligation to share it with all of God’ creation, those we love and those we don’t love. This glimpse is not unique to Christmas – it is a feature of all our liturgical life. 

I hope you will join me in making a mild adjustment to Luke: Let us offer Glory to God in the Highest by making peace on Earth, by making justice on Earth. And to that end and that beginning, I wish you a merry, happy, and blessed Christmas.